Digging Deeper

Microsoft Copilot: History of definitions for the word “domestic” and “United States” in the Internal Revenue Code

By ftsig-admin / September 11, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: History of definitions for the word “domestic” and “United States” in the Internal Revenue Code

QUESTION 1: What year was the first definition of “domestic” in the Internal revenue code? Did it mean the same thing it means now? ANSWER 1: Alright — let’s trace this precisely, because the definition of “domestic” in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) has a long paper trail, and its meaning has been remarkably stable…

Microsoft Copilot: When did the liability statute disappear from the National Income Tax?

By ftsig-admin / September 11, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: When did the liability statute disappear from the National Income Tax?

QUESTION 1: Has there ever been a statute creating liability for income tax at the national level since 1862? ANSWER 1: If by “statute creating liability” you mean a law that expressly imposes a legal duty on a named class of persons to pay a national‑level income tax, the historical record is surprisingly narrow —…

Microsoft Copilot: Do real “public officers” in Titles 5 and 10 of the U.S. Code always owe tax?

By ftsig-admin / September 9, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Do real “public officers” in Titles 5 and 10 of the U.S. Code always owe tax?

EDITORIAL: This website takes the position that if you work for any government, you should pay taxes to that government on your compensation. This is an unavoidable outgrowth of our stance that the I.R.C. Subtitles A and C income tax is a tax exclusively on the government. What could be better than a tax on…

Microsoft Copilot: Meaning of civil statutory “services”

By ftsig-admin / September 3, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Meaning of civil statutory “services”

EDITORIAL: This series of questions demonstrates and explains the following facts: Once you volunteer to engage in “services” as a civil “person” officer of the national government within the U.S. Inc. Federal Corporation in a “DOMESTIC” (26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) status, you can no longer complain that you are a slave like some people mistakenly try…

Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Public Interest Doctrine in Munn v. Illinois

By ftsig-admin / September 2, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Public Interest Doctrine in Munn v. Illinois

QUESTION 1: What does it mean to be “affected with a public interest” in Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113: “This brings us to inquire as to the principles upon which this power of regulation rests, in order that we may determine what is within and what without its operative effect. Looking, 126*126 then, to…

Microsoft Copilot: Can an obligation attached to a civil person in the future continue if the domicile or civil status that is the basis of it is extinguished before the date it triggers?

By ftsig-admin / August 31, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Can an obligation attached to a civil person in the future continue if the domicile or civil status that is the basis of it is extinguished before the date it triggers?

EDITORIAL: This series of questions surrounds whether past actions by American nationals who incorrectly made a “U.S. person” election by filing a 1040 form while working for the government and accumulating pension credits can under 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(6) be used to COMPEL that same American national filing as a nonresident alien and protected by the…

Microsoft Copilot: Can you lawfully consent to enlarge governmental powers?

By ftsig-admin / August 31, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Can you lawfully consent to enlarge governmental powers?

EDITORIAL: On the subject of consent in the context of taxation, the U.S. Supreme Court said: “The constitutional right [Form #10.015] against unjust taxation [of PRIVATE, constitutionally protect property] is given for the protection of private property [Form #12.046], but it may be waived by those affected who consent [Form #05.003] to such action to…

Microsoft Copilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”

By ftsig-admin / August 30, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions proves that: The article also shows you how to litigate the above in a court of law and describe it to the jury. More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: There is no question that the national government has subject matter over its own property throughout the states of…

DEBATE: Is everything paid by the government “effectively connected” without your consent?

By ftsig-admin / August 29, 2025 / Comments Off on DEBATE: Is everything paid by the government “effectively connected” without your consent?

EDITORIAL: More on this subject at: FALSE STATEMENT: 26 U.S.C. §864(c)(2) says in part: In determining whether income from sources within the United States . . . is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States, the factors taken into account shall include whether— (emphasis added) Now I will…

Microsoft Copilot: Are the criminal provisions of the I.R.C. actually penal provisions tied to voluntary franchise provisions?

By ftsig-admin / August 28, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Are the criminal provisions of the I.R.C. actually penal provisions tied to voluntary franchise provisions?

QUESTION 1: What legal criteria would a judge use to distinguish a criminal statute and the penal provisions of a franchise contract? Title 18 lists all the federal crimes but the I.R.C. has its own penal violations that seem to limit themselves to officers or employees of federal corporations in 26 U.S.C. 7343. ANSWER 1:…