Digging Deeper
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3430868523289585207 COPILOT QUESTION 1: Groetzinger is a an important and frequently cited case used to justify the inclusion of activities of personPRI within the meaning of “trade or business”. This article rebuts that presumption. There is a procedural trap that the Court used to bypass the statutory definition of “trade or business” in Commissioner…
INTRODUCTION: Additional information: Copilot: What’s the difference between “trade or business” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(26) and “effectively connected” in 26 U.S.C. 864(b)?, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/copilot-whats-the-difference-between-trade-or-business-in-26-u-s-c-7701a26-and-effectively-connected-in-26-u-s-c-864b/ QUESTION 1: Is “trade or business” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(26) a franchise or a privilege? ANSWER 1: Here is the precise, doctrinally correct answer — the kind that respects your need for…
INTRODUCTION: A fundamental tenet of this website and ministry is that the income tax is a “trade or business” franchise. This series of questions validates, explains, and applies the full legal implications of that approach to ALL franchises and privileges generally, with the view of identifying precisely WHEN consent is required in the case of…
INTRODUCTION: The theme of this site is that government is created to protect PRIVATE property (propertyPRI) and PRIVATE rights (rightsPRI). It does this first and foremost by not STEALING either and obtaining them only by consent as indicated in: Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form #12.025https://sedm.org/LibertyU/SeparatingPublicPrivate.pdf We created the PRI/PUB symbology to recognize and…
INTRODUCTION: More at: PROOF OF FACTS: Why CIVIL statutory “citizen” of the United States in 26 U.S.C. 1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-why-civil-statutory-citizen-of-the-united-states-in-26-u-s-c-1-1-1a-and-b-is-voluntary/ QUESTION 1: You have previously said that adopting a Civil Statutory Capacity (CSC) does not cause a surrender of constitutional rights. In doing so, you have equivocated because: 1. Fifth Amendment rights…
INTRODUCTION: Two main Supreme Court Doctrines directly address how PRIVATE property and PRIVATE rights are converted to PUBLIC property and PUBLIC rights respectively. They are: This series of questions compares these two doctrines to provide a comprehensive analysis of how they interact with your PRIVATE property and PRIVATE rights to produce a tax obligation, and…
INTRODUCTION: This short series of questions: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Are people in government charged with accepting and processing government paperwork “ministerial officers”. 2. What is a “ministerial officer” 3. What are the limitations placed by law upon ministerial officers”? 4. Provide statutes, cases, and legal authorities supporting each statement. ANSWER 1: Below is…
QUESTION 1: Does domicile in a specific place automatically imply being subject to the civil statutory law of that place even though you wish to be protected only by the common law instead of the civil law? ANSWER 1: Short answer: No. Under American law, domicile does not give you the power to choose whether…
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What book or authoritative source describes and proves why political status can’t be used to impose CIVIL obligations? ANSWER 1: Here’s the key thing: there is no single book that directly “proves” political status cannot be used to impose civil obligations, because U.S. courts do not frame…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with how courts collapse CIVIL and POLITICAL categories into one in order to unlawfully enlarge their jurisdiction and authority and destroy the separation of powers as documented in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf Montesquieu was the man who engineered the now famous three branch…