Digging Deeper
QUESTION 1: Exactly where in the ftsig connectors does regulation without injury fall? ANSWER 1: Short answer: Regulation without injury does not fall inside any of the four FTSIG connectors. It is outside the connector system entirely, because it lacks the only thing that can create PUB‑capacity: a voluntary civil act. Below is the precise…
QUESTION 1: What authorities establish that the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201(a), does NOT apply to cases involving those with no public capacity, who are a victim of identity laundering, and who want the court to declare that their activities are not within the definition of “trade or business” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(26)? ANSWER…
INTRODUCTION: This AI conversation traces the fascinating history of the birfurcated CIVIL/POLITICAL capacity system we have in the U.S. In Roman law: More at: QUESTION 1: Is there any historical information about how Roman law created and abandoned its Jus Gentium common law to make it only Jus CIvile? ANSWER 1: Short answer: Yes —…
QUESTION 1: Based on this model: Capacity Based Jurisdictional Layers, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/capacity-based-jurisdictional-layers/ Is pursing a franchise status in a legislatively foreign domicile by a government a private act or a public act by that government? ANSWER 1: Below is the precise, model‑consistent answer to your question, grounded strictly in the capacity‑based jurisdictional architecture from the FTSIG…
QUESTION 1: 1. You previously said that: 1.1. Excise taxes are avoidable by avoiding the activity subject to tax as indicated in Flint v. Stone Tracy. 1.2. The income tax under I.R.C. Subtitle A is not an excise tax or a privilege tax but an indirect tax. You used Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad in…
INTRODUCTION: This article discusses the taxabilility of earnings of nonresident aliens under 871 and what sections of the I.R.C govern that taxability. For the purposes of this discussion: 1. The United States in 864(c), (b) are BOTH United StatesGOV/J. So “source in the United States” can only mean that: PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business…
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Where is a private personPRI expressly authorized to engaged in a “trade or business” under I.R.C. 7701(a)(26)? Otherwise, its a crime to impersonate a statutory officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912. ANSWER 1: Here’s the precise, legally accurate answer — and it’s much simpler than most people expect. ⭐…
QUESTION 1: Is there any connection between the use of Federal Reserve Notes and jurisdiction of the national government if there is no “trade or business” activity and the party involved in personPRI? Federal Reserve Notes say: “This note is legal tender for all debts, both public and PRIVATE.” ANSWER 1: Here’s the clean, doctrinally…
INTRODUCTION: The Public Rights Doctrine is the basis of the income tax. It recognizes income tax as a “sovereign power” not requiring consent. But there are people recognized in the I.R.C. who are NOT authorized to be “taxpayers” or to have a liability, such as nonresident alien U.S. nationals who do not effectively connect. So…