Digging Deeper

Copilot: Mapping of Political Questions Doctrine to FTSIG Symbology and Terminology

By ftsig-admin / April 8, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Mapping of Political Questions Doctrine to FTSIG Symbology and Terminology

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with how courts collapse CIVIL and POLITICAL categories into one in order to unlawfully enlarge their jurisdiction and authority and destroy the separation of powers as documented in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf Montesquieu was the man who engineered the now famous three branch…

Copilot: Legal Relationship Between Fifth Amendment Takings and Civil Regulation

By ftsig-admin / April 6, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Legal Relationship Between Fifth Amendment Takings and Civil Regulation

QUESTION 1: What is the most accurate way consistent with doctrine to describe adverse affects on property rights under the Fifth Amendment to the extent that control over absolutely owned private property is adversely affected by participation in a particular civil statutory benefit or privilege? ANSWER 1: Here’s a way to frame this that stays…

Copilot: Types of Preemption and application to various presence types

By ftsig-admin / April 6, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Types of Preemption and application to various presence types

QUESTION 1: 1. List type types of federal preemption. 2. Add those types to each type of presence in the following: Website Writing Conventions, Section 10: Types of Civil Legal Presencehttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#10._Types ANSWER 1: Thanks for sharing the table — it’s clear you’re working with a conceptual framework that categorizes different types of legal presence and…

Copilot: Whether Retirement benefits of those not consenting to ECI are involuntarily ECI

By ftsig-admin / April 5, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Whether Retirement benefits of those not consenting to ECI are involuntarily ECI

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with the following scenario: Based on this analysis: More on this subject at: Retirement and Pensions, Form #08.028https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RetirementAndPensions.pdf QUESTION 1: Are 401k accounts “effectively connected” for those filing as a nonresident alien? ANSWER 1: Here’s the direct, authoritative, tax‑law‑grounded answer based on the IRS sources we just pulled: ⭐…

Copilot: What is a “gypsy” for the purposes of citizenship?

By ftsig-admin / April 1, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: What is a “gypsy” for the purposes of citizenship?

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions seeks a definition of the term “gypsy” used by Justice Barrett and raised during oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court held on 4/1/26. Context of these questions is provided below: We think something more sinister at the state level is happening. We think they have piggy-backed onto the federal…

Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

By ftsig-admin / March 29, 2026 / Comments Off on Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4, 3/29/26 The Bill of Rights IS the national common law: “It would be a very curious and unsatisfactory result, if, in construing a provision of constitutional law, always understood to have been adopted for protection and security to the rights of the individual as against the government, and which has…

“CIVIL Statutory Capacity” v. Classical “public officer”

By ftsig-admin / March 27, 2026 / Comments Off on “CIVIL Statutory Capacity” v. Classical “public officer”

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions posed to Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4 establishes the following facts: QUESTION 1: What is the BEST doctrinally consistent label for “civil statutory persons” that does not confuse or equivocate them with classical “public officers” under Title 5 of the U.S. code? ANSWER 1: Here’s the cleanest, most doctrinally accurate answer…

Copilot: All Civil Statutory law is a Case of Identity Theft

By ftsig-admin / March 26, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: All Civil Statutory law is a Case of Identity Theft

INTRODUCTION: This whole thing is such a shit show! Chat GPT 5.2 is adamant that it’s all Personal Jurisidiction. You literally cannot get anyone to agree on any aspect of this thing! That’s how you know it’s deceptive. More at: QUESTION 1: Does In personam jurisdiction apply to OFFICES/statuses, or only to the HUMANS occupying…

DEBATE: State Income Taxes under Buck Act Do not include States of the Union

By ftsig-admin / March 3, 2026 / Comments Off on DEBATE: State Income Taxes under Buck Act Do not include States of the Union

INTRODUCTION: This debate tests the applicability of the separation of powers doctrine to the concept of state income taxation. The separation of powers is described in detail in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf The debate concludes that: The subject of this debate is a continuation of the following article: FAQ:…

FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: Fifth Amendment is not a constraint on Income Taxation

By ftsig-admin / February 26, 2026 / Comments Off on FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: Fifth Amendment is not a constraint on Income Taxation

FALSE STATEMENT: The Fifth Amendment is NOT a constraint on income taxation of human beings protected by the Constitution. This is affirmed by the following: So far as the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment is relied upon, it suffices to say that there is no basis for such reliance since it is equally…