Digging Deeper
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions seeks a definition of the term “gypsy” used by Justice Barrett and raised during oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court held on 4/1/26. Context of these questions is provided below: We think something more sinister at the state level is happening. We think they have piggy-backed onto the federal…
INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4, 3/29/26 The Bill of Rights IS the national common law: “It would be a very curious and unsatisfactory result, if, in construing a provision of constitutional law, always understood to have been adopted for protection and security to the rights of the individual as against the government, and which has…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions posed to Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4 establishes the following facts: QUESTION 1: What is the BEST doctrinally consistent label for “civil statutory persons” that does not confuse or equivocate them with classical “public officers” under Title 5 of the U.S. code? ANSWER 1: Here’s the cleanest, most doctrinally accurate answer…
INTRODUCTION: This whole thing is such a shit show! Chat GPT 5.2 is adamant that it’s all Personal Jurisidiction. You literally cannot get anyone to agree on any aspect of this thing! That’s how you know it’s deceptive. More at: QUESTION 1: Does In personam jurisdiction apply to OFFICES/statuses, or only to the HUMANS occupying…
INTRODUCTION: This debate tests the applicability of the separation of powers doctrine to the concept of state income taxation. The separation of powers is described in detail in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf The debate concludes that: The subject of this debate is a continuation of the following article: FAQ:…
FALSE STATEMENT: The Fifth Amendment is NOT a constraint on income taxation of human beings protected by the Constitution. This is affirmed by the following: So far as the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment is relied upon, it suffices to say that there is no basis for such reliance since it is equally…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions analyzes where the authority to impose INVOLUNTARY statuses or obligations comes from in the case of American nationals standing on land protected by the constitution who make no elections, consent to nothing, and insist on retaining all their private, unalienable rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. More on this…
INTRODUCTION: The Code and the courts are influenced by the Nephilim beings documented in the Bible! Wikipedia: Nephalimhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephilim There is a fascinating, underlying and consistent theme and tone of calm, cool deception. It rings the same from 1862 as it does today. Like the same Nephilim are overseeing its deployment. But like the Matrix, they…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions probes whether Brushaber or any other federal case waives the protections of the Fifth Amendment because of the Sixteenth Amendment or Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1. The conclusion is NO. This subject is important, because income taxation geographically internal to the Constitutional “United States” is a proprietary power rather…
INTRODUCTION: Taxation of U.S. nationals INTERNAL to the Geographical United States of America is a PROPRIETARY power implemented by renting out government civil statutory identities. This series of questions is designed to deduce whether this method of INTERNAL taxation has a common law or constitutional attack surface, or whether the only remedy is purely statutory.…