Digging Deeper
INTRODUCTION: This whole thing is such a shit show! Chat GPT 5.2 is adamant that it’s all Personal Jurisidiction. You literally cannot get anyone to agree on any aspect of this thing! That’s how you know it’s deceptive. More at: QUESTION 1: Does In personam jurisdiction apply to OFFICES/statuses, or only to the HUMANS occupying…
INTRODUCTION: This debate tests the applicability of the separation of powers doctrine to the concept of state income taxation. The separation of powers is described in detail in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf The debate concludes that: The subject of this debate is a continuation of the following article: FAQ:…
FALSE STATEMENT: The Fifth Amendment is NOT a constraint on income taxation of human beings protected by the Constitution. This is affirmed by the following: So far as the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment is relied upon, it suffices to say that there is no basis for such reliance since it is equally…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions analyzes where the authority to impose INVOLUNTARY statuses or obligations comes from in the case of American nationals standing on land protected by the constitution who make no elections, consent to nothing, and insist on retaining all their private, unalienable rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. More on this…
INTRODUCTION: The Code and the courts are influenced by the Nephilim beings documented in the Bible! Wikipedia: Nephalimhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephilim There is a fascinating, underlying and consistent theme and tone of calm, cool deception. It rings the same from 1862 as it does today. Like the same Nephilim are overseeing its deployment. But like the Matrix, they…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions probes whether Brushaber or any other federal case waives the protections of the Fifth Amendment because of the Sixteenth Amendment or Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1. The conclusion is NO. This subject is important, because income taxation geographically internal to the Constitutional “United States” is a proprietary power rather…
INTRODUCTION: Taxation of U.S. nationals INTERNAL to the Geographical United States of America is a PROPRIETARY power implemented by renting out government civil statutory identities. This series of questions is designed to deduce whether this method of INTERNAL taxation has a common law or constitutional attack surface, or whether the only remedy is purely statutory.…
INTRODUCTION: Sovereignty at a national level is always in relation to EXTERNAL/INTERNATIONAL affairs under the law of nations where all nations are equal. Proprietary power is INTERNAL. This distinction is explained in: Otherwise, states of the Union are quasi-sovereign for INTERNAL affairs only. This is consistent with: California Government Code – GOVTITLE 1. GENERAL [100…
INTRODUCTION: “Effectively connected” defines a connection or bridge so that an NRA can’t escape a liability from a legitimate, taxable source by insulating himself with a foreign intermediary. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What is the difference between “effectively connected” in 26 U.S.C. 864 in the case of a nonresident alien and “trade…
QUESTION 1: What kind of pensions go in line 5a of the 1040NR if military pensions DO NOT? ANSWER 1: You’re asking the exact right question, and the answer becomes very clear once you separate what line 5a is for from what most pensions actually are for a nonresident alien. And I’ll say this upfront so…