Digging Deeper

Copilot: How Do I prove that the Income Tax is an Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 franchise fee and not an Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 Constitutional Tax?

By ftsig-admin / December 19, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: How Do I prove that the Income Tax is an Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 franchise fee and not an Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 Constitutional Tax?

QUESTION 1: What is the best way to prove that a so-called income tax is really just a franchise rental fee on government civil statusPUB rather than a constitutional income tax under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1? ANSWER 1: Here’s a clear, grounded, non‑legal‑advice explanation of how people typically argue that the modern federal…

Copilot: Origin of domicile and authority of courts to use it

By ftsig-admin / December 18, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Origin of domicile and authority of courts to use it

INTRODUCTION: This interchange proves that domicile is a SCAM of monumental proportions. We don’t think there’s anything wrong with national political membership/citizenship per se. But the national government uses a subclass of said citizens coupled with United StatesGOV (which is really just a label/signal for civil & criminal federal preemption) instead of United StatesP to…

Copilot: Regulation under the Public Interest Doctrine-personPUB or personPRI

By ftsig-admin / December 16, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Regulation under the Public Interest Doctrine-personPUB or personPRI

INTRODUCTION: This analysis describes how the United States of America has slowly transitioned over the years from capitalism with private property to communism where the government owns or at least controls nearly all property. It is implemented through legal propaganda rather than universal propaganda, but the endpoint is exactly the same. For more information dealing…

Copilot: Government agency or office under the Public Rights Doctrine

By ftsig-admin / December 7, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Government agency or office under the Public Rights Doctrine

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What would you call someone who executes instructions of the government on how to do a specific job, and receives no real compensation for doing so but who neither the government nor the specific person giving the instructions is responsible or…

Copilot: Nefarious Uses of “Deeming Provisions”

By ftsig-admin / December 6, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Nefarious Uses of “Deeming Provisions”

INTRODUCTION: “Deeming provisions” in tax law are frequently abused to allow those not subject to tax to consent to do so anyway, and to do so INVISIBLY as a method of INVISIBLE CONSENT in many cases. This line of questions highlights their use. You see the abuse of this tactic in 26 U.S.C. §3402 where…

Copilot: “Created or organized” as the origin of propertyPUB under the Public Rights Doctrine

By ftsig-admin / December 6, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: “Created or organized” as the origin of propertyPUB under the Public Rights Doctrine

INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: The I.R.C. defines “domestic” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(4) as “created or organized in the United States”. 1. The fact that they used the words “created or organized” is essential to establish the civil status it created as propertyPUB. 2. The thing created is not referring to anything…

Copilot: How the Government Regulates or Taxes your Private Property: Through the Public Interest Doctrine and Public Rights Doctrine

By ftsig-admin / December 5, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: How the Government Regulates or Taxes your Private Property: Through the Public Interest Doctrine and Public Rights Doctrine

INTRODUCTION: The Public Interest Doctrine and the Public Rights Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court and their relationship to each other and to you are very important to understand because: This series of questions examines how all the above are implemented and how to challenge all the above processes in a court of law. It…

DEBATE: Copilot v. FTSIG on NRA withdrawing W-4

By ftsig-admin / December 4, 2025 / Comments Off on DEBATE: Copilot v. FTSIG on NRA withdrawing W-4

INTRODUCTION: The W-4 is the WRONG form for All Americans who don’t work for the national government as described in 26 U.S.C. §3401(c). This site mandates that those using it may not consent to ANYTHING the government wants, and the W-4 is a vehicle for said consent. A better approach is to use the following…

Copilot: When did the word “private” transition from absolute ownership under the common law to usufructary ownership under civil statutes?

By ftsig-admin / December 3, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: When did the word “private” transition from absolute ownership under the common law to usufructary ownership under civil statutes?

INTRODUCTION: More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: When did the term “private” transition from being defined as absolute ownership under common law principles to shared ownership through the personPUB usufruct under the civil statutory law? ANSWER 1: Great clarification — you’re asking specifically about the juridical shift in the meaning of “private”: from…

Copilot: What “fact pattern” do you suggest to eliminate ALL equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE in a CIVIL context only?

By ftsig-admin / December 3, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: What “fact pattern” do you suggest to eliminate ALL equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE in a CIVIL context only?

QUESTION 1: For those wishing to PREVENT the type of equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE you have consistently demonstrated throughout this interchange, precisely WHAT predicate “fact pattern” would you suggest included in each new series of questions to completely eliminate all such equivocation? Below is our attempt at doing so, but I’m sure you can…