Capacity-Based Jurisdictional Layers

By ftsig-admin / April 18, 2026 / Comments Off on Capacity-Based Jurisdictional Layers

Table of Contents 1. Introduction — The Capacity Paradigm This document presents a CIVIL capacity-based constitutional architecture grounded in the PUB/PRI framework and independent of physical location. Civil capacity under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17 determines the applicable law in any legal dispute. The geographic model, while useful as an introductory heuristic, contains a…

Copilot: Duties and Authority of “Ministerial Officers” at the IRS and State Revenue Agencies

By ftsig-admin / April 14, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Duties and Authority of “Ministerial Officers” at the IRS and State Revenue Agencies

INTRODUCTION: This short series of questions: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Are people in government charged with accepting and processing government paperwork “ministerial officers”. 2. What is a “ministerial officer” 3. What are the limitations placed by law upon ministerial officers”? 4. Provide statutes, cases, and legal authorities supporting each statement. ANSWER 1: Below is…

Copilot: Common Law and Equitable Non-statutory Relief Still Available in Federal Court

By ftsig-admin / April 11, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Common Law and Equitable Non-statutory Relief Still Available in Federal Court

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: How is an equity action in federal court captioned under the current rules that excludes the civil statutes? ANSWER 1: Takeaway: Under the current Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there is no separate caption for an “equity action,” and there is no way to caption a case that “excludes the…

Copilot: Judicial Corruption Tactics and Defenses

By ftsig-admin / April 11, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Judicial Corruption Tactics and Defenses

INTRODUCTION: On our About Page, we identify mainly judicial corruption as the origin of most of the problems documented on this website. This article summarizes and itemizes specific judicial behaviors that cause these problems. Articles below document the origin of these forms of judicial corruption of the legal system: More on the subject of legal/government…

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (SDO) Acknowledges applicability of 26 U.S.C. 873 to “nationals of the United States”

By ftsig-admin / April 9, 2026 / Comments Off on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (SDO) Acknowledges applicability of 26 U.S.C. 873 to “nationals of the United States”

“Indeed, we fail to see how New York’s disregard for the residence of the alimony recipient does anything more than point out potential inequities in the operation of § 631(b)(6). Certainly, the concept of income splitting works when both former spouses are residents of the 313*313 same State, because one spouse receives a tax deduction corresponding to…

PROOF OF FACTS: You were Never Lawfully Issued a “Social Security Number”

By ftsig-admin / April 8, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: You were Never Lawfully Issued a “Social Security Number”

0. Introduction Thesis: The Social Security Trap: Why You Were Never Assigned a Privileged “Resident” Number To the casual observer, a Social Security Number is just a nine-digit ID. However, a closer parsing of federal regulations reveals a profound distinction between the “individual” who allegedly works for “wages” and the “Brand Name” entity (franchise) owned…

Copilot: Standing to Prosecute Involuntary Domestic Status Classification

By ftsig-admin / April 3, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Standing to Prosecute Involuntary Domestic Status Classification

INTRODUCTION: Statutory “withholding agents” and “employers” are what is called “ministerial officers”. There are strict limits on what they are permitted to do by law. This series of questions describes how to challenge compelled domestic status capacity elections by ministerial officers in the context of withholding, reporting, and the processing of tax returns. Further information…

HOW TO: Filing a Criminal Report against a Company for False Reporting/withholding and criminally Impersonating an “Employer” under I.R.C. 3406

By ftsig-admin / March 27, 2026 / Comments Off on HOW TO: Filing a Criminal Report against a Company for False Reporting/withholding and criminally Impersonating an “Employer” under I.R.C. 3406

1. Executive Summary: This article: Most of these false information returns are filed by companies that have no express authority to act as “employers” outside the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government on federal territory. One approach to stopping these reports is to file a criminal complaint, whether as a SUBSTITUTE for filing a return…

Copilot: All Civil Statutory law is a Case of Identity Theft

By ftsig-admin / March 26, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: All Civil Statutory law is a Case of Identity Theft

INTRODUCTION: This whole thing is such a shit show! Chat GPT 5.2 is adamant that it’s all Personal Jurisidiction. You literally cannot get anyone to agree on any aspect of this thing! That’s how you know it’s deceptive. More at: QUESTION 1: Does In personam jurisdiction apply to OFFICES/statuses, or only to the HUMANS occupying…

Private v. Public: The two types of Choice of Law in Civil Litigation

By ftsig-admin / March 25, 2026 / Comments Off on Private v. Public: The two types of Choice of Law in Civil Litigation

This article documents the two types of standing or choice of law you can have in any litigation, being PUBLIC or PRIVATE, and the implications of either choice. # Description Public Private 1 Documented in CIVIL statutes, regulations Choice of Law, Litigation Tool #01.010 2 Creator of standing Caesar God 3 Property affected (Form #14.018)…