Reference

Useful reference tools when doing legal research about foreign tax status.

REFERENCE: Judicial Equivocation Terms and Methods

By ftsig-admin / August 20, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Judicial Equivocation Terms and Methods

QUESTION 1: Produce a table documenting all the methods of judicial equivocation involving terms: Format the table as follows: For “Citizen”, statutory trigger is NOT 8 U.S.C. §§ 1401–1408. Its using United StatesJ on a government form instead of United StatesG and the effect of the Minimum Contacts Doctrine. Civil statutory obligations DO NOT attach to…

REFERENCE: I.R.C. as a Licensing Scheme

By ftsig-admin / August 19, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: I.R.C. as a Licensing Scheme

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: The Constitutional Structure, the PUB/PRI Ontology, and the De Facto Federal Tax Regime This conversation has traced a comprehensive constitutional analysis of how federal tax law—particularly the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the Sixteenth Amendment—operates through a de facto system of public‑capacity creation that is not authorized by any express constitutional clause. The…

REFERENCE: History of “status crimes” and their Modern Equivalent- The Public Rights Doctrine

By ftsig-admin / August 18, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: History of “status crimes” and their Modern Equivalent- The Public Rights Doctrine

INTRODUCTION: Historical Lineage: Status Crimes → Public Rights Doctrine The discussion begins by tracing the evolution of status crimes in English poor‑law tradition — classifications such as pauper, vagabond, and idle person — which imposed civil regulation based not on wrongful acts but on conditions of dependency. Regulation applied only to those recognized as inhabitants,…

REFERENCE: Techniques for making Proprietary Power under civil statutes LOOK like Sovereign Power

By ftsig-admin / August 17, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Techniques for making Proprietary Power under civil statutes LOOK like Sovereign Power

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Provide a detailed list of all the ways that the present government makes proprietary power look like sovereign power. Break it up into: 1. Statues 2. Regulations 3. Judges 4. Administrative Agencies Format each of the above individual secitons as a matrix with the following columns: 1. Column #1: #…

REFERENCE: Sovereign power and proprietary power evolution, relationship to government ID, and contracting civil statutory proprietary jurisdiction out of your relationships

By ftsig-admin / August 16, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Sovereign power and proprietary power evolution, relationship to government ID, and contracting civil statutory proprietary jurisdiction out of your relationships

INTRODUCTION: More at: DOCTRINE: Court practices for establishing or exercising agency or capacity, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/doctrine-court-practices-for-establishing-or-exercising-agency-or-capacity/ QUESTION 1: “But, except as restrained and limited by that instrument, they possess and exercise the authority of independent States, and the principles of public law to which we have referred are applicable to them. One of these principles is, that…

REFERENCE: I.R.C. Subtitles A and C Statutory Capacities and Trigger Events

By ftsig-admin / August 14, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: I.R.C. Subtitles A and C Statutory Capacities and Trigger Events

INTRODUCTION: This table was generated with Microsoft Copilot on 8/14/26. 1. Columns: 1. Column 1: #2. Column 2: Name3. Column 3: Statute4. Column 4: Classification:a. PUBb. PRIc. Classification only5. Trigger event6. Column 5: Explanation. 2. Rows ✅ Current Table State — 76 Statutory Capacities Section Rows Badge Foundational Definitions & Classifications (§7701) 1–7 🔘 Classification…

REFERENCE: Biblical Perspective on Sovereign v. Proprietary Mode

By ftsig-admin / August 10, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Biblical Perspective on Sovereign v. Proprietary Mode

INTRODUCTION: I. The Foundational Insight: The PRI → PUB Ontology The conversation established a structural ontology that explains the rise and fall of civilizations: Private Capacity (PRI) Public Capacity (PUB) This ontology is the backbone of the entire discussion. The central insight: Civilizations repeatedly convert sovereign power (PRI) into proprietary power (PUB) through legal mechanisms…

REFERENCE: Government Structure for Each Country mapped to PUB/PRI Ontology and Political terms

By ftsig-admin / August 1, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Government Structure for Each Country mapped to PUB/PRI Ontology and Political terms

QUESTION 1: Prepare a matrix comparing all the various forms for government as follows: 1. Column 1: # 2. Column 2: Type 3. Column 3: Support common law? 4. Column 4: CapactityPRI to CapacityPUB transition voluntary or mandatory? 5. Column 5: Support POLITICAL citizen* separate from CIVIL Citizen**+D 6. Column 6: Collectivist? 7. Column 7:…

REFERENCE: Legal limits on property conversion for both privileges and franchises

By ftsig-admin / July 31, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Legal limits on property conversion for both privileges and franchises

INTRODUCTION: The article explains the legal limits governing when private propertyPRI can be converted into public propertyPUB, and why this conversion is only possible through franchises, not privileges. It integrates four doctrines: (1) franchise vs. privilege, (2) lawful PRIVATE→PUBLIC conversion, (3) attachment of private propertyPRI to public capacityPUB, and (4) the Standing Doctrine (sovereign vs…

REFERENCE: How government equivocates and confuses SOVEREIGN power with PROPRIETARY power

By ftsig-admin / July 28, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: How government equivocates and confuses SOVEREIGN power with PROPRIETARY power

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Authorities on SOVEREIGN power and PROPRIETARY power 2. Specific techniques to equivocate SOVEREIGN and PROPRIETARY powers of taxation 2.1. Capacity collapse (PUB/PRI conflation) Move: Treat CapacityPUB (civil identity created by statute) and CapacityPRI (natural/private identity) as interchangeable, so that entering any federal “program” is framed as mere administration of sovereign obligations.…