Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix:  Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS

1. Introduction

A civil statutory status legislatively created and owned by Congress as public property is the mechanism to regulate your activities as a tax franchise participant.  Under legal principles, the Creator of a thing is the owner.  Examples of civil statutory statuses include:

  1. “Person”
  2. “Taxpayer”.
  3. “citizen of the United States”.
  4. “Employee”.
  5. “Nonresident alien”.

We refer to the above civil statutory statuses as statutory offices or civil offices rather than “public offices” because calling them “public offices” leads to confusing them with classical “public offices” under Title 5 of the U.S. Code.  We call the person occupying the position the officer.  There must be a DIRECT, CONSENSUAL connection between the “civil office” and human “officer” or else slavery and involuntary servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment will be the result.  This is further explored in:

Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008
https://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/RightToDeclStatus.pdf

Because it would be an existential threat to the revenue of the government to reveal to you that you are a volunteer, explaining the process of volunteering must be concealed mostly by judges as a Third Rail Issue.  The articles below explain what a Third Rail Issue is and HOW that concealment happens:

  1. Third Rail Government Issues, Form #08.032
    https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/ThirdRailIssues.pdf
  2. PROOF: Involuntary civil statutory obligations are a product of Judicial Corruption of Republican Principles, FTSIG
    https://ftsig.org/proof-involuntary-civil-statutory-obligations-are-a-product-of-judicial-corruption-of-republican-principles/

The result of the above processes of concealment is that your consent is INVISIBLE and UNINFORMED, as explained in:

Invisible Consent, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/

The court rules of evidence, however, must be distorted to make this process of consent INVISIBLE and yet LEGALLY ACTIONABLE.  This is done by exploiting legal ignorance about the court rules of evidence distinguishing a FACT from a LEGAL CONCLUSION.  All government forms require a perjury statement.  A perjury statement verifies FACTS, not LEGAL CONCLUSIONS.

  1. Facts
    1.1. Are independently verifiable by anyone.
    1.2. Are based on physical characteristics or behaviors that can be witnessed.
    1.3. Deal with birth names on birth certificates, dates, times, physical addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, actions, and statements on your part.
  2. Legal conclusions
    2.1. Require legal expertise and competency.
    2.2. Result from the application of FACTS to a specific contract, statute, or law.
    2.3. May only be made by those who are credentialed and authorized to do so.
    2.4. Cannot be compelled.
    2.5. Violate the rules of evidence if they are compelled during legal discovery.

Ironically, if you try to demand a legal conclusion of a government lawyer in court, they will respond with:

“Objection, your honor:  Calls for a legal conclusion.”

And yet, they use it all the time against YOU to rob you blind through franchises that you don’t want to participate in.

Government franchise forms such as income tax forms are ONLY supposed to gather or document FACTS and NEVER LEGAL CONCLUSIONS from legally untrained people such as most Americans.  These forms, however, have been abused as a method of INVISIBLE RECRUITMENT into government franchises by blurring the lines between FACTS and LEGAL CONCLUSIONS.  In order to recruit you into a franchise, the government has to fool you into connecting yourself to a specific CIVIL STATUS without you knowing that is what you are doing and to do so under penalty of perjury as a LEGAL CONCLUSION rather than just a FACT.  By doing that, you become a unwitting volunteer.  Thus, the recipe is:

  1. Mix FACTS and LEGAL CONCLUSIONS together on the form.
  2. Never distinguish the difference.
  3. Get you to make a legal conclusion AS IF it were a FACT.
  4. The LEGAL CONCLUSION then becomes an INVISIBLE ELECTION of CIVIL STATUS.

The above process is described in the training course below:

Avoiding Traps in Government Forms Course, Form #12.023
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/AvoidingTrapsGovForms.pdf

Below is a video explanation of this SATANIC recruitment process direct from Satan’s mouth:

Devil’s Advocate: Lawyers. What We are Up Against (OFFSITE LINK, 190Mbytes, 12 minutes, H.264)-the legal profession has become a Satanic priesthood that runs the entire government and which eventually will enslave us all
http://sedm.org/what-we-are-up-against/

The result of EVERYONE being victimized by this process is explained below:

Government Corruption, Form #11.401
https://sedm.org/home/government-corruption/

Since there are MANY types of civil statutory statuses, there are many types of ELECTIONS.  Below is a list of most such elections:

Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue Code, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/

2. Consent Creates the PUBLIC “Person” and results in a SUBCLASS Election in the case of Nonresident Aliens

The term “nonresident alien” represents a CLASS. It is described but not defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B):

26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions

(b)Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien

(1)In general

For purposes of this title (other than subtitle B)—

(A)Resident alien

An alien individual shall be treated as a resident of the United States with respect to any calendar year if (and only if) such individual meets the requirements of clause (i), (ii), or (iii):

(i)Lawfully admitted for permanent residence

Such individual is a lawful permanent resident of the United States at any time during such calendar year.

(ii)Substantial presence test

Such individual meets the substantial presence test of paragraph (3).

(iii)First year election

Such individual makes the election provided in paragraph (4).

(B)Nonresident alien

An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States (within the meaning of subparagraph (A)).

Note that the above is a DESCRIPTION but not a legal DEFINITION. It describes what a “nonresident alien” is NOT and does not list all the types of “nonresident aliens” there are. Thus, it is not a legal “definition” because it does not give the reader express “reasonable notice” of all the things that it includes. In failing to give said reasonable notice, it violates the constitutional requirement for reasonable notice and DECEIVES the reader by omitting to inform them exactly how they can remain exclusively PRIVATE as the constitution requires governments to allow you to do. See:

Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf

The above DECEPTIVE description of “nonresident alien” only lists “individuals” as a subclass but in fact, if you examine the IRS form 1040NR and all the versions of form W-8, you will see that there are lots of other subclasses such as:

  1. Trusts.
  2. Estates.
  3. Foreign corporations.
  4. Foreign governments.

In the case of the “individual” subclass, you must make an ADDITIONAL civil election to join the subclass by pursing a civil privilege of some kind such as:

  1. Deductions under 26 U.S.C. §873(b)(3) and 26 U.S.C. §162.
  2. Exemptions under 26 U.S.C. §874.
  3. Effectively connected elections under 26 U.S.C. §864(b) and 26 U.S.C. §871(b). This results in you becoming the “person” in 26 U.S.C. §6671(b) and 26 U.S.C. §7343 by virtue of being engaged in “personal services”, which is a code word for service to the national government as its agent handling government property in a legislative foreign jurisdiction. As said agent, you then are engaged in a “trade or business within the United StatesGOV” corporation. See:
    Establishing USPI thru laws of property, Section 2: The ORIGIN of PUBLIC/GOVERNMENT Property: “Domestic”/”trade or business within the United States”/”personal services”, FTSIG
    https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/establishing-uspi-thru-laws-of-property/#2._The

If you as a U.S. national never make a privileged election above that puts you in the CIVIL “individual” subclass, then you remain a civil “non-person”, foreign, private, and external to the “United StatesGOV” as described in:

Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/NonresidentNonPersonPosition.pdf

Below is a summary of all the classes and subclasses that result in tacit procuration of civil privileges and government enslavement:

#ClassSubclassAuthorities
1U.S. national
26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c)		Citizen* of the United StatesGOV26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b)
2AlienResident of the Citizen* of the United StatesGOV26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b)
3Nonresident alienIndividual26 U.S.C. §873(b)(3),
26 U.S.C. §874,
26 U.S.C. §864(b)

NOTES:

  1. No civil obligations attach DIRECTLY to the CLASS above. They only attach to the SUBCLASS.
  2. All the above SUBCLASS elections convert your status from PRIVATE/FOREIGN/EXTERNAL to PUBLIC/DOMESTIC/INTERNAL.
  3. There are also other elections that can ADD to the privileges to the SUBCLASSES listed above but the don’t convert your civil status from PRIVATE to PUBLIC in doing so. Those elections are listed below:
    Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue Code, FTSIG
    https://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/

If you would like more details on how civil elections are how you volunteer into government civil legislative jurisdiction, see:

IRS Fraud and Deception About the Statutory Word “Person”, Form #08.023
Section 7: Consent to a PRIVILEGE Creates the Civil “individual” and “person”
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/IRSPerson.pdf

3. Avoiding Civil Status Elections

Below is an example of language useful in AVOIDING these types of INVISIBLE elections on a tax return:

6. CHOICE OF LAW AND TERMS OF COMMERCIAL USE OF  MY PROPERTY AND IDENTIFYING INFORMATION:

1. This claim is brought under Article III and the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) and not the I.R.C, seeking recovery of amounts alleged to have been improperly assessed, collected, or paid to you. This petition is submitted in a purely private capacity, invoking rights and remedies recognized under general common law and equity rather than under statutory civil public capacity provisions. The exclusions asserted herein re not claimed as civil privileges or exemptions “created or organized” under Article I, but as mandatory constitutional recognition of private capacity under Article III.  On that basis, this submission is not intended as a proprietary election to be treated as a “nonresident alien individual” under 26 U.S.C. §§873(b)(3), 864(b), or 6671(b).  Such an election is not necessary given that I can find no express liability statute for 1040NR filers under 26 U.S.C. §871. If you believe otherwise, please provide evidence of an express liability.  I therefore assert that no civil statutory civil penalties or limitation periods may lawfully apply to this submission or any private capacity activity.

2. Accordingly, this action is brought as an illegal‑exaction claim seeking return of private funds collected under statutory provisions that do not apply to my circumstances. It is not a request for deductions, exemptions, or other statutory benefits available only to those who voluntarily elect public capacity within the proprietary authority established under Subtitle A pursuant to Congress’ proprietary Sixteenth Amendment powers. I do not dispute Congress’ sovereign power to rent public capacities it legislatively creates as public property for a free, call that fee a “tax”, or even do so without real consideration, but only to the extent that I can do the same thing to them with my private property and identity.  They cannot lawfully force those public capacities upon unwilling private capacity victims who enjoy constitutional protections like me without express, informed, and voluntary consent not evident in this case, however, without running afoul of the First, Fifth, and Thirteenth Amendments, and the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine, and committing identity theft and false personation.

3. If the bureau believes I remain in custody, use, or benefit of any proprietary public property, civil statutory status, or privilege that I both asked for and received that would trigger CIVIL regulatory or taxing jurisdiction (United StatesJ in 26 U.S.C. §864(b)), I respectfully request court admissible evidence of same signed under penalty of perjury as required by 26 U.S.C. §6065 and the Benefit Protection Equivalence Doctrine so that any such interest or value may be formally disproved with evidence or entirely returned immediately.  I am therefore literally asking you to do your only legitimate job as a real government under the constitution:  Protecting private property by keeping it separate from public property and never allowing it to mix with public property.  If you won’t do that, I question why I should hire you with taxes to protect me from anyone else. Absent said proof, ownership over myself and my property in private capacity is absolute and I hereby exercise the right to exclude and the right to exercise any method of control over that property in your wrongful custody that I choose.

4. All disclosures or commercially beneficial uses of my identifying information or private property in your wrongful possession or anyone you give it to are unauthorized beyond this direct interaction, and I reserve all rights regarding any unauthorized commercial use of my identifying information.  You agree to pay any amount I specify in return for all said unauthorized commercial uses or abuses if my property is not returned immediately.

5. Amounts reported and received by the United States have been falsely characterized as proprietary “tax” and “withholding” by the payer and are claimed for refund. Any of my absolutely owned property in your wrongful custody that is not returned as requested herein constitutes consideration beyond that point which gives rise to an equitable obligation to repay double the amount compounding every year and all legal fees and labor needed to recover it. This correspondence constitutes notice of said terms as the owner of the private property in your wrongful custody, if any.  To the extent my private property in your unauthorized, wrongful, and unlawful custody is not promptly returned as requested, this correspondence shall also serve as ACCEPTANCE of said terms. 

Statement for Administrative Record in the Event you ignore, refuse, or attempt to penalize this filing

In the event of a legal dispute over the equitable refund claimed herein, supporting materials are available upon request and may be incorporated into the administrative record as appropriate.  This submission is made in good faith with full reservation of constitutional rights. It satisfies the Beard Test criteria for a valid return and may not be penalized, ignored, or interfered with.  26 U.S.C. §7203 (failure to file) may be invoked if it is.  The agency’s jurisdiction arises from the public‑rights doctrine and from government‑created PUBLIC property interests, including civil statutory status, public capacity, definitions, or remedies “created or organized” under 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) and therefore “domestic”. Any presumption or equivocation that places me in a public capacity involuntarily raises constitutional due‑process concerns. I do not consent to waive constitutional due process or the Federal Rules of Evidence through any public‑capacity election and reject all attempts to compel said election as a constitutional tort under the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine.

Caselaw arising from circumstances involving elected public capacities, voluntary participation in civil statutory franchises, or parties other than nonresident aliens not engaged in a trade or business is inapposite to my situation and may not be cited in response.  Ensure that the facts in every case you cite EXACTLY match my circumstances or the case will be ignored as moot .

Pursuant to the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. Chapter 21B, my religion requires me to reject every benefit, privilege, domestic (INTERNAL) civil statutory status, public capacity, definition, or remedy “created or organized” under 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(4). My only civil statutory “creator and organizer” and civil “lawgiver” is God and His laws, not any government of men. Being compelled to recognize, elect, or become involuntary surety for public capacities created or organized by any other civil statutory lawgiver violates my sincerely held religious beliefs, biblical delegation order, and covenantal duties as God’s trustee.

 Since no public capacity privilege or “individual” status has been elected, 26 C.F.R. § 1.6012‑1(b)(1)(i) does not apply to private capacity parties and is merely directory in nature in my private capacity case. I also do not meet the regulatory definition of the alien “individual” subject to withholding under 26 C.F.R. § 1.1441‑1(c)(3), nor do I voluntarily engage in proprietary privileged activities treated as a “trade or business” or “effectively connected” for federal tax purposes. My understanding is these statutory terms reflect Congress’ exercise of proprietary authority over public civil capacities and activities “created or organized” under proprietary powers in the Sixteenth Amendment, not over private capacity sovereign taxation under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1.

Lastly, I am compelled to take the above approach because IRS guidance prohibits nominee relationships, and a statutory public capacity functions as a nominee for the human being. All determinations involving public capacities (“taxpayer”, “person”, “U.S. person”) require legal conclusions. I do not consent to make and am not authorized to make legal conclusions, and doing so would constitute the unauthorized practice of law.

Any perjury statement provided validates only facts I add to existing government forms, and not information preexisting on the form or its factual connection to me or my circumstances.  A perjury statement cannot validate legal conclusions, and nearly all entries on IRS forms relate to legal conclusions about statutory public capacity rather than private factual or evidentiary events that involve physical human beings. Ministerial officers may not rely on my perjury statement to validate legal conclusions, public capacities, or may they make legal conclusions of their own, act as fact witnesses, or turn my legal conclusions into facts.  This provision ensures these limits are not violated.

[Attachment to 1040NR Return for U.S. national filing as a “Nontaxpayer” and Private Party, FTSIG;
SOURCE: https://ftsig.org/attachment-to-1040nr-return-for-us-national-filing-as-a-nontaxpayer/]

Finally, the AI discovery below deeply examines the subject of this section. It is very profound:

HOW TO: Distinguishing “Facts” from “Legal Conclusions”, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-to-distinguishing-facts-from-legal-conclusions/