Foreign Tax Status Information Group (FTSIG)

---

“Evil men do not understand justice, But those who seek [and OBEY] the Lord understand all.”
[Prov. 28:5, Bible, NKJV]

---

“The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude [to the state as a public officer such as a “taxpayer”] is at once the consequence of his crime.”

[John Philpot Curran, 1790]

---

“Liberty Means Responsibility [no benefits, privileges, entitlements, or public property].  That’s why most men dread it.”
[George Bernard Shaw]

---

“Unrestricted power of taxation is the greatest power over accumulated wealth, manufacturers, industry, and personal freedom which any government can have; for liberty, as Hampden found out, cannot be worth much to a man [who volunteered to be a “U.S. person” in this case] who may be taxed in any way some other man pleases.” 

[Congress and the Constitution, The Nation, p. 214, March 21, 1895]

---

“Either be TOTALLY free and own yourself or be the MOST EXPENSIVE slave on the planet so your parens patriae government plantation owner will have no choice but to expel you from the plantation or go bankrupt.”
[SEDM]

---

Curses of Disobedience [to God’s Laws]

“The alien [Washington, D.C. is legislatively “alien” in relation to states of the Union] who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower [malicious destruction of EQUAL PROTECTION and EQUAL TREATMENT by abusing FRANCHISES].  He shall lend to you [Federal Reserve counterfeiting franchise], but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail.

“Moreover all these curses shall come upon you and pursue and overtake you, until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the voice of the Lord your God, to keep His commandments and His statutes which He commanded you.  And they shall be upon you for a sign and a wonder, and on your descendants forever.

“Because you did not serve [ONLY] the Lord your God with joy and gladness of heart, for the abundance of everything,  therefore you shall serve your [covetous thieving lawyer] enemies, whom the Lord will send against you, in hunger, in thirst, in nakedness, and in need of everything; and He will put a yoke of iron [franchise codes] on your neck until He has destroyed you.  The Lord will bring a nation against you from afar [the District of CRIMINALS], from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flies [the American Eagle], a nation whose language [LEGALESE] you will not understand,  a nation of fierce [coercive and fascist] countenance, which does not respect the elderly [assassinates them by denying them healthcare through bureaucratic delays on an Obamacare waiting list] nor show favor to the young [destroying their ability to learn in the public FOOL system].  And they shall eat the increase of your livestock and the produce of your land [with “trade or business” franchise taxes], until you [and all your property] are destroyed [or STOLEN/CONFISCATED]; they shall not leave you grain or new wine or oil, or the increase of your cattle or the offspring of your flocks, until they have destroyed you.
[Deut. 28:43-51, Bible, NKJV; More at:
How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardian; https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm]

---

1. Introduction

Welcome to our website. We exist to offer you third party court admissible evidence about how to implement a foreign tax status as an American business or American national born anywhere in the United States of America. A foreign tax status is the ONLY option available for those who want to maximize personal liberty and private property while avoiding collectivism and control of you or your property by the administrative state as documented in:

1. Collectivism and How to Resist It Course, Form #12.024
   https://sedm.org/LibertyU/Collectivism.pdf
2. Administrative State: Tactics and Defenses Course, Form #12.041
   https://sedm.org/LibertyU/AdminState.pdf

This site focuses on lawfully avoiding taxation by avoiding government franchises. In its simplest form, a franchise is a consensual or contractual arrangement to rent or use someone else’s property in exchange for consideration or property in some form. The property from the franchisor is called a “grant” and the price to procure the property granted can take the form mainly of money or civil statutory obligations you accept that are called “personal services” or services. Those who sign up for franchises acquire what is called a legal status, civil status, or tax status and a corresponding license or account number that is used to donate otherwise private property as consideration to the franchise. The account number or license number used to donate consideration to the franchisor is called a “franchise mark” by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). On this site, privileges and franchises are used interchangeably and excise taxes are the consideration used to reimburse the franchisor for the cost of delivering the benefits of the franchise.

Members of the franchise are called civil statutory “persons”, “U.S. persons”, “taxpayers”, “domestic”, etc., which are all described as legal statuses, civil statuses, offices, and tax statuses. Non-Members are called:

1. “foreign non-persons” or
   Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/NonresidentNonPersonPosition.pdf
2. “foreign persons” if they purposefully availed themself of civil statutory privileges in some form. See:
   Acquiring a Civil Status, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/acquiring-a-civil-status/

Civil or legal statuses are produced ONLY by your consent in some form and that consent creates a legal connection between the legal status and a specific human being who becomes surety for the status.

1.1. Foreign Tax Status

A “foreign tax status” includes such things as “nonresident aliens”, “foreign corporations”, “foreign trusts”, “foreign estates”, “foreign partnerships”, etc. Nonresident aliens include (listed on the 1040-NR return itself in the upper right corner):

1. Human beings.
2. Trusts.
3. Estates.

Those with a “foreign tax status”:

1. Are collectively are called “foreign persons” by the IRS if they pursue a taxable privilege and
2. “Non-persons” (Form #05.020) otherwise.

The pursuit of a privilege under the Minimum Contacts Doctrine is what turns a “non-person” into a civil statutory “person” or “individual”. We cover this in:

Acquiring a Civil Status, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/acquiring-a-civil-status/

Because they love money (1 Tim. 6:10) more than protecting your freedom or happiness or following REAL law (Form #05.048), the IRS, doesn’t like admitting that there is such a thing as a “non-person” or a “nontaxpayer” who they have no jurisdiction or tax enforcement authority over. Consequently, there is a lot of malicious government deception, willful omission, and equivocation about this subject as thoroughly documented in:

1. IRS Fraud and Deception About the Statutory Word “Person”, Form #08.023
   https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/IRSPerson.pdf
2. Your Rights as a “Nontaxpayer”, Publication 1a, Form #08.008
   https://sedm.org/LibertyU/NontaxpayerBOR.pdf
3. Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/LegalDecPropFraud.pdf

The pursuit of privileges includes such things as:

1. Having a privileged “alien” status.
2. Voluntarily pursing a privileged civil status such as “citizen” or “resident” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1 or “United States Person” under 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30). This converts the status of the man or woman owner of property from PRIVATE to PUBLIC.
3. Taking privileged deductions under 26 U.S.C. §162. 26 U.S.C. §873 acknowledges that even “nationals of the United States” can be “individuals” if they do this, even though they are “nonresidents” everywhere in the world under the presence test in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b).
4. Donating otherwise nontaxable PRIVATE earnings to a public use by “effectively connecting” as a “nonresident alien”. This is done by entering otherwise PRIVATE earnings on a foreign tax return such as a 1040-NR. Not every instance of “effectively connecting” is a donation, but it is for American Nationals.

Anyone who is not a “resident alien”, including American Nationals, can lawfully adopt a foreign tax status. “Foreign non-persons” are outside the legislative jurisdiction of Congress either abroad or even within a Constitutional state because:

1. They have a foreign DOMICILE, not a foreign NATIONALITY. . .AND
2. They are not representing a fictional entity such as a “U.S. person” that has a FOREIGN DOMICILE in the District of Columbia or the statutory geographical “United States” . . .AND.
3. They did not consensually pursue a taxable privilege.

“Foreign non-persons” can still, however, donate their otherwise PRIVATE property to the government to make it taxable by “effectively connecting” it (Form #05.056) on a tax return. This makes it into public property the national government can reach legislatively anywhere in the world, so long as they can reach either the owner or someone in possession of the property. Obviously, since “effectively connecting” private earnings is an act of DONATING private property to a public use for an American National, this is not a good idea. If you don’t do it, then you never even need deductions to reduce a tax liability.

1.2. Domestic Tax Status

The OPPOSITE of a “FOREIGN person” is a DOMESTIC “U.S. person”. Important facts about DOMESTIC “U.S. person” you probably don’t know and suffer greatly by not knowing:

1. It is VOLUNTARY. If you as an American born anywhere in United States as a country don’t want to volunteer, you can choose “nonresident alien” and adopt a foreign tax status. The U.S. Supreme Court admitted that the civil statutory status of “citizen” is voluntary, which implies that you have the RIGHT to unvolunteer. This MUST be so, because the Thirteenth Amendment forbids INVOLUNTARY servitude and the First Amendment prohibits COMPELLED association, including LEGAL association with the body politic. Thus, these amendments MANDATE that government MUST give you that choice.
   
   “The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government. He owes allegiance to the two departments, so to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties which each exacts for disobedience to its laws. In return, he can demand protection from each within its own jurisdiction.”
   [United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)  [emphasis added]
2. The Internal Revenue Code Subtitle A is consistent with the fact that you are a volunteer because there is no statute EXPRESSLY making anyone liable for income tax except withholding agents on nonresident aliens in 26 U.S.C. §1461. Thus, you can acquire obligations under it ONLY by electing (consenting to) a status that civil obligations attach to when you submit a tax return.
3. You volunteer for the status by filing 1040 tax return instead of 1040-NR.
4. It has NOTHING to do with your nationality or even whether you are political citizen or a Fourteenth Amendment citizen. You can be am American National and STILL have a foreign tax status as a “nonresident alien” (foreign person) instead of a “U.S. person” anywhere in the WORLD. 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) says that only aliens are subject to the presence test, which implies that American Nationals are NONRESIDENT everywhere in the WORLD unless and until they CHOOSE to be “resident”. In so doing, they waive their foreign and private status in exchange for PRIVILEGES associated with the DOMESTIC status and the corporate privileges associated with it.
5. It pays tax on its WORLDWIDE earnings rather than only on the earnings from the U.S. government as in the case of a nonresident alien.
6. It is a CIVIL STATUTORY straw man that is part of a franchise called a “trade or business” in legal terminology, which is then defined as “the functions of a public office”.
7. It is a DOMESTIC fictional corporate entity and an agency or office or position within the U.S. government.
8. It acts in a representative capacity representing the government.
9. It is an agent of the Department of the Treasury within the Executive branch serving under the Secretary of the Treasury. Regulations written by the Secretary under the authority of 5 U.S.C. §301 manage and direct and limit everything a “U.S. person” does or can do because the STATUS and the OFFICE it creates is PROPERTY of the Department of the Treasury.
10. When you volunteer, you agree to act as a “resident agent” for an office or position domiciled in the District of Columbia under 4 U.S.C. §72, 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(39), and 26 U.S.C. §7408(d), regardless of where you have YOUR domicile. The SSN is your AGENT ID. That office or position is also called a “tax status”. It is the location of the “res” legislatively created and and therefore owned as property by the Congress.
11. It is a steward and property manager for the U.S. government under the terms of a commercial franchise (Form #05.030). The PUBLIC property it manages are the privileges and obligations of the office itself and whatever FORMERLY PRIVATE property you attach the SSN franchise mark to and thus donate to a public use within the “trade or business” (Form #05.001) franchise.
12. Under principles of equity and unjust enrichment, your act of applying for and actually pursuing the status and the “benefits and privileges” attached to the CIVIL statutory “U.S. person” status and franchise by filing the 1040 return conveys the legal authority and standing to the government creator and owner of the status to enforce the civil obligations associated with it against you. That enforcement authority is called a “quasi-contract” by the U.S. Supreme Court in Milwaukee v. White, 296 U.S. 268 (1935).

The “citizen” upon whom the tax is imposed in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) is NOT merely and ONLY a POLITICAL/TERRITORIAL “citizen* of the United States**” (federal zone) described in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c). There would be NO NEED for these two things if they were both the same. INSTEAD, it is a:

1. POLITICAL/TERRITORY “citizen” defined in 8 U.S.C. §1401 as described in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c).
2. AND who is ALSO “OF the United States***” (corporation and not geography).

There would be NO NEED to separate the above two in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (c) if these things were synonymous and they referred to the SAME “United States“. They HAD to do it this way because of the following requirements to implement a LEGITIMATE franchise that the income tax is:

“In a legal or narrower sense, the term “franchise” is more often used to designate a right or privilege conferred by law, [1]   and the view taken in a number of cases is that to be a franchise, the right possessed must be such as cannot be exercised without the express permission of the sovereign power [2]   –that is, a privilege or immunity of a public nature which cannot be legally exercised without legislative grant. [3]   It is a privilege conferred by government on an individual or a corporation to do that “which does not belong to the citizens [NATIONALS or “nationals of the United States” who are nonresident aliens] of the country generally by common right.” [4] For example, a right to lay rail or pipes, or to string wires or poles along a public street, is not an ordinary use which everyone may make of the streets, but is a special privilege, or franchise, to be granted for the accomplishment of public objects [5]  which, except for the grant, would be a trespass. [6]    In this connection, the term “franchise” has sometimes been construed as meaning a grant of a right to use public property, or at least the property over which the granting authority has control. [7]”
[American Jurisprudence 2d, Franchises, §1: Definitions (1999)]

---

FOOTNOTES:

[1]  People ex rel. Fitz Henry v. Union Gas & E. Co. 254 Ill. 395, 98 N.E. 768; State ex rel. Bradford v. Western Irrigating Canal Co. 40 Kan 96, 19 P. 349; Milhau v. Sharp, 27 N.Y. 611; State ex rel. Williamson v. Garrison (Okla), 348 P.2d. 859; Ex parte Polite, 97 Tex Crim 320, 260 S.W. 1048.

The term “franchise” is generic, covering all the rights granted by the state.  Atlantic & G. R. Co. v. Georgia, 98 U.S. 359, 25 L.Ed. 185.

A franchise is a contract with a sovereign authority by which the grantee is licensed to conduct a business of a quasi-governmental nature within a particular area.  West Coast Disposal Service, Inc. v. Smith (Fla App), 143 So.2d. 352.

[2] The term “franchise” is generic, covering all the rights granted by the state.  Atlantic & G. R. Co. v. Georgia, 98 U.S. 359, 25 L.Ed. 185.

A franchise is a contract with a sovereign authority by which the grantee is licensed to conduct a business of a quasi-governmental nature within a particular area.  West Coast Disposal Service, Inc. v. Smith (Fla App), 143 So.2d. 352.

[3]  State v. Real Estate Bank, 5 Ark. 595; Brooks v. State, 3 Boyce (Del) 1, 79 A. 790; Belleville v. Citizens’ Horse R. Co., 152 Ill. 171, 38 N.E. 584; State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. 40 Minn 213, 41 N.W. 1020.

[4] New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Louisiana Light & H. P. & Mfg. Co., 115 U.S. 650, 29 L.Ed. 516, 6 S.Ct. 252; People’s Pass. R. Co. v. Memphis City R. Co., 10 Wall (US) 38, 19 L.Ed. 844; Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet (U.S.) 519, 10 L.Ed. 274; Bank of California v. San Francisco, 142 Cal. 276, 75 P. 832; Higgins v. Downward, 8 Houst (Del) 227, 14 A. 720, 32 A. 133; State ex rel. Watkins v. Fernandez, 106 Fla. 779, 143 So. 638, 86 A.L.R. 240; Lasher v. People, 183 Ill. 226, 55 N.E. 663; Inland Waterways Co. v. Louisville, 227 Ky. 376, 13 S.W.2d. 283; Lawrence v. Morgan’s L. & T. R. & S. S. Co., 39 La.Ann. 427, 2 So. 69; Johnson v. Consolidated Gas E. L. & P. Co., 187 Md. 454, 50 A.2d. 918, 170 A.L.R. 709; Stoughton v. Baker, 4 Mass 522; Poplar Bluff v. Poplar Bluff Loan & Bldg. Asso., (Mo App) 369 S.W.2d. 764; Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, 296 N.Y. 249, 72 N.E.2d. 697, 1 A.L.R.2d. 1160, cert den  332 U.S. 761, 92 L.Ed. 346, 68 S.Ct. 63; Shaw v. Asheville, 269 N.C. 90, 152 S.E.2d. 139; Victory Cab Co. v. Charlotte, 234 N.C. 572, 68 S.E.2d. 433; Henry v. Bartlesville Gas & Oil Co., 33 Okla 473, 126 P. 725; Elliott v. Eugene, 135 Or. 108, 294 P. 358; State ex rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co. 157 S.C. 1, 153 S.E. 537; State v. Scougal, 3 S.D. 55, 51 N.W. 858; Utah Light & Traction Co. v. Public Serv. Com., 101 Utah 99, 118 P.2d. 683.

A franchise represents the right and privilege of doing that which does not belong to citizens generally, irrespective of whether net profit accruing from the exercise of the right and privilege is retained by the franchise holder or is passed on to a state school or to political subdivisions of the state.  State ex rel. Williamson v. Garrison (Okla), 348 P.2d. 859.

Where all persons, including corporations, are prohibited from transacting a banking business unless authorized by law, the claim of a banking corporation to exercise the right to do a banking business is a claim to a franchise.  The right of banking under such a restraining act is a privilege or immunity by grant of the legislature, and the exercise of the right is the assertion of a grant from the legislature to exercise that privilege, and consequently it is the usurpation of a franchise unless it can be shown that the privilege has been granted by the legislature.  People ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. Utica Ins. Co., 15 Johns (NY) 358.

[5] New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Louisiana Light & H. P. & Mfg. Co., 115 U.S. 650, 29 L.Ed. 516, 6 S.Ct. 252; People’s Pass. R. Co. v. Memphis City R. Co., 10 Wall (US) 38, 19 L.Ed. 844; Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet (U.S.) 519,  10 L.Ed. 274; Bank of California v. San Francisco, 142 Cal. 276, 75 P. 832; Higgins v. Downward, 8 Houst (Del) 227, 14 A. 720, 32 A. 133; State ex rel. Watkins v. Fernandez, 106 Fla. 779, 143 So. 638,  86 A.L.R. 240; Lasher v. People, 183 Ill. 226, 55 N.E. 663; Inland Waterways Co. v. Louisville, 227 Ky. 376, 13 S.W.2d. 283; Lawrence v. Morgan’s L. & T. R. & S. S. Co., 39 La.Ann. 427, 2 So. 69; Johnson v. Consolidated Gas E. L. & P. Co., 187 Md. 454, 50 A.2d. 918, 170 A.L.R. 709; Stoughton v. Baker, 4 Mass 522; Poplar Bluff v. Poplar Bluff Loan & Bldg. Asso. (Mo App) 369 S.W.2d. 764; Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, 296 N.Y. 249, 72 N.E.2d. 697,  1 A.L.R.2d. 1160, cert den  332 U.S. 761,  92 L.Ed. 346,  68 S.Ct. 63; Shaw v. Asheville, 269 N.C. 90, 152 S.E.2d. 139; Victory Cab Co. v. Charlotte, 234 N.C. 572, 68 S.E.2d. 433; Henry v. Bartlesville Gas & Oil Co., 33 Okla 473, 126 P. 725; Elliott v. Eugene, 135 Or. 108, 294 P. 358; State ex rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co. 157 S.C. 1, 153 S.E. 537; State v. Scougal, 3 S.D. 55, 51 N.W. 858; Utah Light & Traction Co. v. Public Serv. Com., 101 Utah 99, 118 P.2d. 683.

A franchise represents the right and privilege of doing that which does not belong to citizens generally, irrespective of whether net profit accruing from the exercise of the right and privilege is retained by the franchise holder or is passed on to a state school or to political subdivisions of the state.  State ex rel. Williamson v. Garrison (Okla), 348 P.2d. 859.

Where all persons, including corporations, are prohibited from transacting a banking business unless authorized by law, the claim of a banking corporation to exercise the right to do a banking business is a claim to a franchise.  The right of banking under such a restraining act is a privilege or immunity by grant of the legislature, and the exercise of the right is the assertion of a grant from the legislature to exercise that privilege, and consequently it is the usurpation of a franchise unless it can be shown that the privilege has been granted by the legislature.  People ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. Utica Ins. Co., 15 Johns (NY) 358.

[6] People ex rel. Foley v. Stapleton, 98 Colo. 354, 56 P.2d. 931; People ex rel. Central Hudson Gas & E. Co. v. State Tax Com. 247 N.Y. 281, 160 N.E. 371, 57 A.L.R. 374; People v. State Tax Comrs. 174 N.Y. 417, 67 N.E. 69, affd  199 U.S. 1, 50 L.Ed. 65, 25 S.Ct. 705.

[7] Young v. Morehead, 314 Ky. 4, 233 S.W.2d. 978, holding that a contract to sell and deliver gas to a city into its distribution system at its corporate limits was not a franchise within the meaning of a constitutional provision requiring municipalities to advertise the sale of franchises and sell them to the highest bidder.

A contract between a county and a private corporation to construct a water transmission line to supply water to a county park, and giving the corporation the power to distribute water on its own lands, does not constitute a franchise.  Brandon v. County of Pinellas (Fla App), 141 So.2d. 278.

Ordinary POLITICAL/TERRITORIAL “citizens” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) have common rights and therefore that status CANNOT be a franchise. So they had to tack “of the United States****” federal corporation at the end to make it a franchise that pertains to a SPECIFIC consenting human. THIS is why the U.S. Supreme Court refers to income taxes as “quasi-contractual” in nature in Milwaukee v. White, 296 U.S. 268 (1935). THIS VOLUNTEER “citizen* of the United States****” federal corporation is, in fact, SYNONYMOUS with the government itself and therefore is an AGENT of the government:

“A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and of that state or country only.”
[19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §886 (2003)]

---

“A foreign corporation is one that derives its existence solely from the laws of another state, government, or country, and the term is used indiscriminately, sometimes in statutes, to designate either a corporation created by or under the laws of another state or a corporation created by or under the laws of a foreign country.”

“A federal corporation operating within a state is considered a domestic corporation rather than a foreign corporation.  The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” 
[19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §883 (2003)]

Thus, the “citizen” who is the “taxpayer” is a POLITICAL/TERRITORIAL citizen who VOLUNTEERED to work WITHIN the Treasury Department under the Secretary of the Treasury by making an election in filing the 1040 return, and thus LITERALLY “electing” themself into government office or agency. They are “foreign” in respect to a constitutional state and an agent of the national government. That ELECTION is thoroughly described in:

How American Nationals VOLUNTEER to Pay Income Tax, Form #08.024
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/HowYouVolForIncomeTax.pdf

Note that we DO NOT contest the validity, history, or ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. There are no disabilities to being a POLITICAL/CONSTITUTIONAL Fourteenth Amendment “citizen* of the United States***” (states of the Union and not federal territory) that we are aware of. What we object to is frequent government equivocation between the CIVIL/DOMICILED “citizen(**+D) of United States****” (legal/corporation) in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and the POLITICAL/CONSTITUTIONAL citizen* mentioned in the Fourteenth Amendment, because they are NOT the same and in fact are mutually exclusive. This source of government deception is a red herring to draw your attention away from the main point of this website, which is the distinction between a FRANCHISE or CIVIL or TAX status on the one hand, and a CONSTITUTIONAL status on the other. This is explained in:

Why the Fourteenth Amendment is Not a Threat to Your Freedom, Form #08.15
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/FourteenthAmendNotProb.pdf

1.3. What?!

Foreign tax status is the default status of most Americans. You can transition from foreign to domestic ONLY by CONSENT or MISTAKE in some form. If you never knowingly consent to ANYTHING, you can’t be rationally be anything but foreign and are entitled to return of all taxes paid that depend on your consent, which is nearly all the taxes paid by most Americans.

Don’t believe us about the AMAZING statements above?

1. Read the proof for yourself:
   How American Nationals Volunteer to Pay Income Tax, Form #08.024
   https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/HowYouVolForIncomeTax.pdf
2. Click Here for a dialog with an AI chatbot that not only says we are right, but that our position is quite coherent. Ask these questions of your favorite chatbot and see for yourself.

If what we are saying is true, then WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR? The prison house door is WIDE OPEN. Why didn’t they teach you this in the IRS publications or public school? Because they want obedient tax slaves who think they know everything and don’t question anything. They want to close your mind with the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

2. Which “United States” are you “in”?

Most people automatically PRESUME that “United States”, when used in every context, is GEOGRAPHICAL, and that it always encompasses the entire COUNTRY. But in tax law, nothing could be farther from the truth! Within the Internal Revenue Code, there are two main contexts for the term “United States”:

1. GEOGRAPHICAL. This appears in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) and 4 U.S.C. §110(d). It EXCLUDES areas within the exclusive jurisdiction of constitutional states.
2. LEGAL/CORPORATE: This is the “United States” as a PRIVILEGED, excise taxable federal corporation under 28 U.S.C. §3002(15)(A), a fiction of law, and a legal “person”. This is actually the DEFAULT context used throughout the I.R.C. This entity is legally “foreign” with respect to constitutional states of the Union.

2.1. Geographical

Throughout the I.R.C. other than 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) the phrase “geographical United States” is never expressly invoked so it is purposefully excluded from every invocation of the term “United States” when used. The only scenarios when the geographical “United States” might even be reasonably presumed in the case of Subtitles A (income tax) and Subtitle C (employment tax) are:

1. In the context of the GEOGRAPHY that POLITICAL/TERRITORIAL “citizens” are physically BORN within. This is found, for instance, in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c). These areas exclude the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state.
2. In the context of domicile, which is an VOLUNTARY, First Amendment act of POLITICAL and LEGAL affiliation with people (the “state”) occupying an area within specific geographical boundaries. The Internal Revenue Code only invokes the term “domicile” in subtitle B relating to estate taxes, and never to income taxes in Subtitle A.
3. In the context of the physical “presence test” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) relating only to “alien individuals”. American Nationals are not aliens so they wouldn’t be governed by this provision. In this context, the regulation at 26 C.F.R. §301.7701(b)-1(c)(2)(ii) EXPANDS the DEFAULT geographical definition of “United States” at 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) to ADD the LEGISLATIVELY FOREIGN states of the Union mentioned in the Constitution ONLY for the purposes of the presence text but not tax liability generally.
4. In the context of income NOT connected with the “trade or business”/public office franchise in 26 U.S.C. §871(a). That “United States” is territorial as confirmed by 26 C.F.R. §1.45R-1(a)(23) in the case of real property located in the statutory geographical “United States” subject to depreciation under 26 U.S.C. §871(a).
5. In connection with the taxation of what the U.S. Supreme Court calls TANGIBLES, which are always PHYSICAL objects such as land, equipment, chattel, and buildings.

2.2. Legal/Corporate

In all contexts OTHER than the previous section, “United States” by default in the Internal Revenue Code Subtitles A and C is conclusively presumed to be used in its LEGAL context, meaning the CORPORATION and not the GEOGRAPHY. That presumption is established by the following:

“In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes it is the established rule not to extend their provisions, by implication, beyond the clear import of the language used, or to enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not specifically pointed out. In case of doubt they are construed most strongly against the Government, and in favor of the citizen. United States v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story, 369; American Net & Twine Co. v. Worthington, 141 U.S. 468, 474; Benziger v. United States, 192 U.S. 38, 55.”

[Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, 153 (1917);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10517878702666744364]

For more authorities like the above, see:

PROOF OF FACTS: Ambiguous tax statutes are to be construed against the government, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-ambiguous-tax-statutes-are-to-be-construed-against-the-government/

So long as you define “citizen” in in its POLITICAL/CONSTITUTIONAL and NOT CIVIL/DOMICILED sense in the Gould cite above, you now have a plausible deniability defense as well that keeps you out of the “U.S. person” trap (Form #05.053). The constitution’s requirement for reasonable notice mandates that you must receive accurate and unambiguous notice of everything that is required and expected of you and everything that is “included”. See Form #05.022. Using the word “includes” to define the geographical “United States” (I.R.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10)) needlessly adds ambiguity in transmitting the constitutionally required reasonable notice and makes judges susceptible to criminal bribery and conflict of interest in ADDING to the statutory definitions. Tax crimes also require willfulness as a prerequisite. If you never receive unambiguous notice of everything that is expressly included, then the law is void for vagueness and you have a rule of lenity defense in any criminal tax proceeding beyond that point. Essentially, you are throwing up your hands and claiming the law is “void for vagueness”, at least in so far as the term “United States” is defined and used throughout the Internal Revenue Code.

The Legal/Corporate context of “United States” is INTANGIBLE PROPERTY and a FICTION. It is a collection of property and rights (which are property) which together form a “res” or “thing” in a legal context. It is PUBLIC property which includes:

1. EVERYTHING the government as a corporation (an abstraction and an intangible fiction) owns, whether TANGIBLE or INTANGIBLE, managed under the trust indenture that established government called the Constitution. The purpose of all trust indentures is EXCLUSIVELY to manage PROPERTY.
2. All of YOUR property which you share an ownership interest in with the United States government. This property we call PUBLIC property. That shared ownership is also called “qualified ownership” in legal terminology. To share any aspect of CONTROL over your property is to share OWNERSHIP of that property. For instance, such property includes:
   2.1. Your BODY and YOURSELF by associating it with a civil statutory status, tax status, or civil legal status such as “person”, “individual”, “taxpayer”, “U.S. person”, etc.
   2.2. Your formerly PRIVATE property that you as the original PRIVATE owner VOLUNTARILY DONATE or CONNECT to the government by “effectively connecting” it as a nonresident alien to “the functions of a public office”. See:
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/EffectivelyConnected.pdf

Now do you know why we say:

THE + IRS = THEIRS. If they can tax it, its THEIR property.

Intangible property is always taxed ONLY at the DOMICILE of the OWNER.

“Respecting this, there is an obvious distinction between the tangible and intangible property, in the fact that the latter is held secretly; that there is no method by which its existence or ownership can be ascertained in the State of its situs, except perhaps in the case of mortgages or shares of stock. So if the owner be discovered, there is no way by which he can be reached by process in a State other than that of his domicil, or the collection of the tax otherwise enforced. In this class of cases the tendency of modern authorities is to apply the maxim mobilia sequuntur personam, and to hold that the property may be taxed at the domicil of the owner as the real situs of the debt, and also, more particularly in the case of mortgages, in the State where the property is retained. Such has been the repeated rulings of this court. Tappan v. Merchants’ National Bank, 19 Wall. 490; Kirtland v. Hotchkiss, 100 U.S. 491; Bonaparte v. Tax Court, 104 U.S. 592; Sturges v. Carter, 114 U.S. 511; Kidd v. Alabama, 188 U.S. 730; Blackstone v. Miller, 188 U.S. 189.”

[Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky, 199 U.S. 194, 205 (1905);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14163786757633929654]

Since domicile is voluntary and is an act of MEMBERSHIP which is VIRTUAL and POLITICAL and not PHYSICAL, then it is CORPORATE rather than GEOGRAPHICAL in that sense. Yes, it is tied to the boundaries of the body politic that provides the civil protection or civil services that you want to become a member of, but the MEMBERSHIP is virtual:

intangible, adj. (17c) Not capable of being touched; impalpable; INCORPOREAL.

intangible, n. (1914) Something that lacks a physical form; an abstraction, such as responsibility; esp., an asset that is not corporeal, such as intellectual property.
> general intangible. (1935) Any personal property other than accounts, chattel paper, commercial tort claims, deposit accounts, documents, goods, instruments, investment property, letter-of-credit rights, letters of credit, money, and oil, gas, or other minerals before extraction. • Some examples are goodwill, things in action, and literary rights. UCC §9-102(a)(42). See intangible property under PROPERTY •
> payment intangible. (1996) A general intangible under which the account debtor’s principal obligation is a monetary obligation. UCC §9-102(a}(61) .

intangible asset. 1. See ASSET. 2. See intangible trade value under VALUE (2).

[Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th Edition, p. 962]

---

intangible property. (1843) Property that lacks a physical existence. • Examples include stock options and business goodwill. Cf. tangible property.

[Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th Edition, p. 1471]

Intangibles include such things as:

1. Labor.
2. Services.
3. Stocks.
4. Bonds.
5. Contracts.
6. Franchises.
7. Promissory notes.
8. Currency.

To lawfully avoid taxation of intangibles, merely avoid:

1. Choosing a consensual domicile and
2. Representing an entity that has a domicile in the forum you want to avoid taxation within. This is done by adopting a tax status that has a domicile within the forum. This status is evidence of voluntary membership in the corporation. It includes “person”, “individual”, “taxpayer”, “U.S. citizen”, “domestic”, etc.

For the MOST AMAZING and SIMPLE and EFFECTIVE way to challenge income taxes on intangibles we have ever seen that blows up the ENTIRE fiat currency scam and the income tax itself, see:

META AI: Proof that 26 U.S.C. 871(a) earnings are PROFIT only and that labor is NOT taxable under this statute, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/meta-ai-proof-that-26-u-s-c-871a-earnings-are-profit-only-and-that-labor-is-not-taxable-under-this-statute/

2.3. Implications

To then say that you as a DOMESTIC entity or civil “person” fiction are working “in the United States” (under 26 U.S.C. §864(b)) or that you have “income” from “sources within the United States” (under 26 U.S.C. §861) in the context of the LEGAL/CORPORATE “United States” actually means you are an officer or agent of the national government or are in receipt of a privileged payment from the national government respectively. That office or agent position:

1. Is VOLUNTARY!
2. Is called a “legal status”, “tax status”, or “civil status“.
3. Is SYNONYMOUS with the term “trade or business”, which is defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) as “the functions of a public office”. Only those LAWFULLY engaged in such a office through an appointment or political election can exercise such functions. For anyone ELSE, it’s a crime to do so under 18 U.S.C. §912. There is no provision within the Internal Revenue Code that EXPRESSLY authorizes the creation of any new public office not already lawfully created under Title 5 of the U.S. Code. You can’t UNILATERALLY ELECT yourself into a NEW public office, for instance, merely by your consent. Doing so would make you a “de facto officer” working within a now “de facto government” (Form #05.043).
4. VOLUNTARILY serves UNDER the Secretary of the Treasury in the Department of Treasury in the Executive Branch per 5 U.S.C §301. It was, in fact, created by him through regulation and not statute in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1, and in so doing, he unlawfully EXCEEDED the authority delegated to him in 26 U.S.C. §1. See:
   How American Nationals Volunteer to Pay Income Tax, Form #08.024, Section 9
   https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/HowYouVolForIncomeTax.pdf
5. Can be acquired by any number of means, all of which we refer to on this site as an “election”, meaning YOUR CONSENT.

Your connection to the national government as its agent or officer is created by:

1. Your act of consent, whether IMPLIED or EXPLICIT. See:
   Invisible Consent, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/
2. An act of contracting or engaging in commerce with the government. For instance, owners of stock in a privileged government sanctioned public corporation are considered CONTRACTORS of the government. See:
   Path to Freedom, Form #09.015, Sections 5.5-5.7
   https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/PathToFreedom.pdf
3. The receipt of government/public property that gives rise to an equitable obligation to use it under the terms of a grant or loan and return it when called to do so by its owner. This includes all civil statutory public benefits, franchises, privileges, licenses, permits, etc. See:
   Private Right or Public Right? Course, Form #12.044
   https://sedm.org/LibertyU/PrivateRightOrPublicRight.pdf
4. Being voluntarily engaged in the “trade or business”/public office excise taxable franchise anywhere in the world. 26 U.S.C. §871(b) income is NON-GEOGRAPHICAL and can be earned wherever a public office and the “trade or business” activity is exercised, because the officer is operating in a representative capacity and HIMSELF is a “source within the United States” federal corporation.

2.4. Foreign is someone not operating inside the LEGAL/CORPORATE United States****

A “nonresident alien non-person” or “foreigner” are merely someone who is not within the LEGAL United States fictional corporation, and thus is operating in a PRIVATE and therefore FOREIGN and autonomous capacity in relation to the United States Government. They become “persons” and “foreign persons” by:

1. Aliens: Being privileged aliens conducting business within the forum or venue as a foreign affairs function under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution.
2. Nationals: Seeking commercial privileges from the national government or its agents and thus waiving sovereign immunity to become LEGALLY but not PHYSICALLY present within the forum under:
   2.1. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. Chapter 97 
   2.2. The Minimum Contacts Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court in International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945).

For those who are Christians, God COMMANDS you to LEAVE THE HARLOT CORPORATION and become “foreign” and PRIVATE, and to take ALL of your property with you:

“Come out from among them
And be separate [FOREIGN/PRIVATE], says the Lord.
Do not touch what is unclean [corrupted],
And I will receive you.”
¹⁸ “I will be a Father to you,
And you shall be My sons and daughters,
Says the Lord Almighty.”
[1 Cor. 6:17-18, Bible, NKJV]

“Come out of her, my people, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues. ⁵ For her sins have reached to heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities. ⁶ Render to her just as she rendered to you, and repay her double according to her works; in the cup which she has mixed, mix double for her. ⁷ In the measure that she glorified herself and lived luxuriously [using BENEFITS and PRIVILEGES], in the same measure give her torment and sorrow; for she says in her heart, ‘I sit as queen, and am no widow, and will not see sorrow.’ ⁸ Therefore her plagues will come in one day—death and mourning and famine. And she will be utterly burned with fire, for strong is the Lord God who judges her.
[Rev. 18:4-8, Bible, NKJV]

Those who REFUSE the above command direct from God are called “friends of the world”. A “friend of the world” is someone who chose to be DOMESTIC/PUBLIC. They in effect are CONSENTING to the worst form of political evil, which is “collectivism” as documented in:

Collectivism and How to Resist It Course, Form #12.024
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/Collectivism.pdf

Ironically, some corrupt and covetous members of the legal profession call people who AVOID collectivism “idiots”.

Are You an “Idiot”?, SEDM
https://sedm.org/are-you-an-idiot-we-are/

Some attorneys slander those who insist on being foreign most likely because their services are not useful outside of the privileged PUBLIC/DOMESTIC context they operate exclusively within and derive their entire livelihood from, as documented in:

Petition for Admission to Practice, Family Guardian
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/LegalEthics/PetForAdmToPractice-USDC.pdf

Those who pursue being DOMESTIC/PUBLIC and consent to collectivism receive the following punishment for their arrogant refusal to obey God, which is STRIVE, wars, famines, plagues, political polarization, lawfare, and even violent revolutions:

Pride Promotes Strife

4 Where do wars and fights come from among you? Do they not come from your desires for pleasure [irresponsibility and the UNEARNED wealth of others] that war in your members [Members of the LEGAL/CORPORATE “United States”]? ² You lust [after OTHER people’s money] and do not have. You murder and covet and cannot obtain. You fight and war. Yet you do not have because you do not ask. ³ You ask and do not receive, because you ask amiss, that you may spend it on your pleasures. ⁴ Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend [statutory “citizen” or “taxpayer” or “resident” or “inhabitant“]  of the world [DOMESTIC] makes himself an enemy of God. ⁵ Or do you think that the Scripture says in vain, “The Spirit who dwells in us yearns jealously”?

⁶ But He gives more grace. Therefore He says:

“God resists the proud,
But gives grace to the humble.”
[James 4:1-6, Bible, NKJV]

Thus, LEAVING the Babylon Harlot Corporation and becoming FOREIGN is a “religious practice” protected by the First Amendment. Any attempt by anyone in government to interfere with that practice violates the First Amendment and is a tort. The “strict scrutiny” standard of the U.S. Supreme Court must be applied to any and all government attempts to interfere with it.

If you want proof that you can be within the GEOGRAPHICAL “United States” WITHOUT being within the LEGAL/CORPORATE “United States”, see:

1. Acquiring a Civil Status, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/acquiring-a-civil-status/
2. PROOF OF FACTS: “individual” is a public officer fiction and “U.S. source” means GOVERNMENT source, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-individual-is-a-public-officer-fiction-and-u-s-source-means-government-source/
3. Proof That There Is a “Straw Man”, Form #05.042
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/StrawMan.pdf
4. Definitions: “in the United States”, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/in-the-united-states/
5. PROOF OF FACTS: “INTERNAL” within “IRS” name means inside the government and “taxpayers” work for the Treasury, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-internal-within-irs-name-means-inside-the-government-and-taxpayers-work-for-the-treasury/
6. PROOF OF FACTS: What the geographical “United States” means in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-what-the-geographical-united-states-means-in-26-u-s-c-7701a9-and-a10/
7. Definitions: “United States”
   https://ftsig.org/united-states/
8. Website Definitions, Section 32: “United States”
   https://ftsig.org/advanced/definitions/#32._United
9. Authorities on “includes”, Form #10.004, Cites by Topic, SEDM- the definition of GEOGRAPHICAL “United States” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) uses the word “includes”.
   https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/includes.htm
10. Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014, Section 18.2: Abuse of “includes” and “including” in statutory definitions. -The definition of GEOGRAPHICAL “United States” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) uses the word “includes”
    https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/LegalDecPropFraud.pdf
11. META AI: Can a privilege not expressly authorized by statute be granted purely by judicial discretion if the judges pay derives from fees connected to paying for the delivery of the privilege?, FTSIG
    https://ftsig.org/meta-ai-can-a-privilege-not-expressly-authorized-by-statute-be-granted-purely-by-judicial-discretion-if-the-judges-pay-derives-from-fees-connected-to-paying-for-the-delivery-of-the-privilege/

3. What are some of the ADVANTAGES of a Foreign Tax Status?

1. Any of the following groups can be “nonresident aliens”:
   1.1. American nationals residing anywhere in the world, INCLUDING those in states of the Union.  See Form #09.081.
   1.2. Aliens residing abroad.
   1.3. Aliens residing anywhere in the United States* the country and married to a nonresident alien under 26 U.S.C. §6013(g) and (h).
2. Pay tax on ONLY PROFIT for all earnings not voluntarily “effectively connected” in the case of an American National. 26 U.S.C. §871(a). This is entirely consistent with the Sixteenth Amendment because those not privileged are STILL protected by that amendment. “U.S. persons” pay tax on GROSS RECEIPTS!
3. INTANGIBLE earnings such as labor and services taxed ONLY at the domicile of the laborer in a constitutional state, RATHER than being taxable to the national government. See:
   META AI: Proof that 26 U.S.C. 871(a) earnings are PROFIT only and that labor is NOT taxable under this statute, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/meta-ai-proof-that-26-u-s-c-871a-earnings-are-profit-only-and-that-labor-is-not-taxable-under-this-statute/
4. Do not owe tax on their WORLDWIDE earnings like statutory “U.S. citizens” and “U.S. residents”, collectively called “U.S. persons” (26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30)). See Form #05.053.
5. Not required to use a Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number if NOT engaged in a “trade or business”.  See 26 C.F.R. §301-6109-1(b).
6. Only “U.S. sourced” payments are taxable, including:
   6.1. Earnings originating from the statutory geographical “United States” under 26 U.S.C. §871(a) (District of Columbia).
   6.2. Government payments that are effectively connected under 26 U.S.C. §871(b) from anywhere in the WORLD.
7. Earnings from WITHOUT the statutory geographical United States** and not paid by the U.S. government are EXCLUDED rather than EXEMPTED from tax under 26 U.S.C. §872.  See:
   Excluded Earnings and People, Form #14.019
   https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/ExcludedEarningsAndPeople.pdf
8. 1040NR tax return:
   8.1. Is simpler to prepare for most Americans than the 1040 because less has to go on it.
   8.2. Can use Form 1040NR return for partnerships, LLCs, and trusts just like the 1040.
   8.3. Uses the SAME tax table as U.S. persons.
   8.4. Can be used both in a constitutional state or abroad.
   8.5. Can take deductions on effectively connected (trade or business, Form #05.001) earnings just like STATUTORY “U.S. Persons”, but deductions are FAR MORE limited.
9. No Foreign Bank Account Reporting (FBAR) under 31 U.S.C. §5314, unlike U.S. persons.
10. Not subject from Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandates to have health insurance. See the following and section 11 of this page:
    Microsoft Copilot: Affordable Care Act limited to TERRITORIAL/POLITICAL citizens and nationals, not Fourteenth Amendment “citizens of the United States”, FTSIG
    https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-affordable-care-act-limited-to-territorial-political-citizens-and-nationals-not-fourteenth-amendment-citizens-of-the-united-states/
11. No Beneficial Ownership reporting under 31 U.S.C. §5336(a)(3) BOIR Beneficial Owner.
12. Identifying number on the return is called “Your Identifying Number” instead of “Social Security Number” or “Taxpayer identification Number”. 
13. Domiciled outside of federal jurisdiction and thus unreachable by the civil statutory law.  See:
    Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #05.002
    https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Domicile.pdf
14. Cannot be criminally prosecuted for anything but fraud on a government tax form.  See:
    Challenging Jurisdiction Workbook, Form #09.082
    https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/ChalJurWorkbook.pdf

4. Why is Foreign Tax Status an Option for Every American National?

The government has to give you a way out of the system or they can’t call it voluntary. They have to give you a way out because:

1. The Declaration of Independence declares that all just powers of CIVIL government derive from your CONSENT, so they have to give you a right to NOT consent somehow. If they don’t, taxation is UNJUST.
2. The First Amendment guarantees you a right to associate and freedom from compelled LEGAL association.
   2.1. The act of choosing a civil domicile or a civil status UNDERNEATH that domicile such as “citizen” or “resident” is an exercise of that unalienable right of association.
   2.2. Similarly, the act of choosing “nonresident alien” is also an exercise of that right.
   NO ONE in government can therefore interfere with the exercise of either of the above two choices or of the CONSEQUENCES of those choices. If obligations attach to a DOMICILED “citizen”, courts must ENFORCE those VOLUNTARY obligations.
3. Government is created to PROTECT your right to contract or not contract. See Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 700 (1878). The U.S. Supreme Court declared that the income tax is “quasi-contractual” in Milwaukee v. White, 296 U.S. 268 (1935). They can’t force you to engage in EITHER a contract OR a “quasi-contract” with them without your consent in some form.
4. Involuntary servitude is prohibited by the Constitution (Thirteenth Amendment) everywhere in the United States as a country. See:
   Proof that Involuntary Income Taxes on Your Labor are Slavery, Form #05.055
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ProofIncomeTaxLaborSlavery.pdf
5. It is a maxim of the common law that you AT ALL TIMES have a right to refuse “benefits”, and by implication privileges. If you don’t, there is no way to avoid any and every obligation they want to attach to the benefit or privilege and thereby become an involuntary slave. Such benefits include a graduated rate of tax, deductions, tax credits, etc.
   
   “A person is ordinarily not required to pay for benefits which were thrust upon him with no opportunity to refuse them. The fact that he is enriched is not enough, if he cannot avoid the enrichment.” Wade, Restitution for Benefits Conferred Without Request, 19 Vand. L. Rev. at 1198 (1966).
   [Siskron v. Temel-Peck Enterprises, 26 N.C.App. 387, 390 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975)]

Your unalienable First Amendment right to associate and the right to contract are the two most DANGEROUS rights you have, because they can literally DESTROY all your other rights! Use them cautiously! You own yourself and you are the ONLY one who can lawfully exercise those rights in a way that can adversely affect you or your property. In the case of the tax system, the constitutional requirement to give you reasonable notice of the exercise of these rights is not overtly given, and thus your consent is procured INVISIBLY. WATCH OUT!

Uncle Sam therefore had to create the nonresident alien “foreign” tax status so that you could lawfully avoid the CIVIL obligations attached to the “U.S. person” status that in effect “pay for” the delivery of the benefits of that status.

If anyone imposes any tax status, civil status, or legal status against you that involves obligations against you of any kind without your proven consent in some form, then you are a victim of criminal identity theft as described below:

Government Identity Theft, Form #05.046
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/GovernmentIdentityTheft.pdf

Likewise, if anyone changes the civil status of your property from PRIVATE to PUBLIC by assigning a tax status or civil status or legal status to it without your proven consent in some form in a format ONLY YOU can define as the owner, they are STEALING in violation of the Fifth Amendment. It is your ABSOLUTE prerogative as the absolute owner of your private property to require that all such conversions MUST be done ONLY in writing signed by both parties AND identifying that the transfer is voluntary and cannot be forced. See:

Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form #12.025
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/SeparatingPublicPrivate.pdf

5. The DOMESTIC “U.S. Person” status is PUBLIC PROPERTY of Uncle Sam and a PRIVILEGE

Since Uncle Sam created the statutory “U.S. person,” franchise or privilege, he is the OWNER and has the right to define the allowable candidates of its potential franchisees. The CREATOR of a thing is always the OWNER under legal principles. Rather than go with nationality or domicile, Uncle decided to make the “U.S. person” franchise status accessible to only a certain class of “citizen” born within the exclusive jurisdiction of territories and possessions but not Constitutional states or to resident aliens domiciled on federal territory. This new “citizen” or “resident” civil status established by the franchisor is the ONLY lawful target of CIVIL enforcement under I.R.C. 6671(b) and CRIMINAL enforcement under I.R.C. 7343. NO EXPRESS LIABILITY statute is needed to make you the lawful target of enforcement because the election itself is all the consent needed to make enforcement lawful. That election happens by simply submitting a government form that identifies you WITH the status, such as “taxpayer”, “citizen of the United States****(government)”, “resident of the United States****(government)”, “U.S. individual”, etc. The only choice you have if you want to avoid obligations of the status is to:

1. Choose a DIFFERENT form. OR
2. Make your own form. OR
3. Define the terms to avoid the status and the obligations that attach to it.

There is NOTHING you can do to get a CONSTITUTIONAL remedy beyond the point of accepting their legislatively created and owned PUBLIC tax status or civil status. This is because by voluntarily pursuing the franchise civil status of statutory “U.S. person” you SURRENDERED constitutional remedies in exchange for Congressionally granted PRIVILEGES, which are PUBLIC property under what the U.S. Supreme Court calls “The Public Rights Doctrine” and the “Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine”.

26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions

(a)When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof—

(4)Domestic

The term “domestic” when applied to a corporation or partnership means created or organized in the United States [federal corporation, not geography] or under the law of the United States or of any State unless, in the case of a partnership, the Secretary provides otherwise by regulations.

---

“These general rules are well settled:

(1) That the United States, when it creates rights in individuals against itself, is under no obligation to provide a remedy through the courts. United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, 128 U.S. 40; Ex parte Atocha, 17 Wall. 439; Gordon v. United States, 7 Wall. 188, 195; De Groot v. United States, 5 Wall. 419, 431-433; Comegys v. Vasse, 1 Pet. 193, 212.

(2) That, where a statute creates a right and provides a special remedy, that remedy is exclusive. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Co., 236 U.S. 165, 174-175; Arnson v. Murphy, 109 U.S. 238; Barnet v. National Bank, 98 U.S. 555, 558; Farmers’ & Mechanics’ National Bank v. Dearing, 91 U.S. 29, 35.

Still, the fact that the right and the remedy are thus intertwined might not, if the provision stood alone, require us to hold that the remedy expressly given excludes a right of review by the Court of Claims, where the decision of the special tribunal involved no disputed question of fact and the denial of compensation was rested wholly upon the construction of the act. See Medbury v. United States, 173 U.S. 492, 198; Parish v. MacVeagh, 214 U.S. 124; McLean v. United States, 226 U.S. 374; United States v. Laughlin, 249 U.S. 440. “

[United States v. Babcock, 250 U.S. 328, 331 (1919);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13911914425951042261]

---

“The distinction between public rights and private rights has not been definitively explained in our precedents. Nor is it necessary to do so in the present cases, for it suffices to observe that a matter of public rights must at a minimum arise “between the government and others.” Ex parte Bakelite Corp., supra, at 451, 49 S.Ct., at 413. In contrast, “the liability of one individual to another under the law as defined,” Crowell v. Benson, supra, at 51, 52 S.Ct., at 292, is a matter of private rights. Our precedents clearly establish that only controversies in the former category may be removed from Art. III courts and delegated to legislative courts or administrative agencies for their determination. See Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm’n, 430 U.S. 442, 450, n. 7, 97 S.Ct. 1261, 1266, n. 7, 51 L.Ed.2d. 464 (1977); Crowell v. Benson, supra, 285 U.S., at 50-51, 52 S.Ct., at 292. See also Katz, Federal Legislative Courts, 43 Harv.L.Rev. 894, 917-918 (1930).FN24 Private-rights disputes, on the other hand, lie at the core of the historically recognized judicial power.”

[. . .]

Although Crowell and Raddatz do not explicitly distinguish between rights created by Congress [PUBLIC RIGHTS] and other [PRIVATE] rights, such a distinction underlies in part Crowell’s and Raddatz’ recognition of a critical difference between rights created by federal statute and rights recognized by the Constitution. Moreover, such a distinction seems to us to be necessary in light of the delicate accommodations required by the principle of separation of powers reflected in Art. III. The constitutional system of checks and balances is designed to guard against “encroachment or aggrandizement” by Congress at the expense of the other branches of government. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S., at 122, 96 S.Ct., at 683. But when Congress creates a statutory right [a “privilege” or “public right” in this case, such as a “trade or business”], it clearly has the discretion, in defining that right, to create presumptions, or assign burdens of proof, or prescribe remedies; it may also provide that persons seeking to vindicate that right must do so before particularized tribunals created to perform the specialized adjudicative tasks related to that right. FN35 Such provisions do, in a sense, affect the exercise of judicial power, but they are also incidental to Congress’ power to define the right that it has created. No comparable justification exists, however, when the right being adjudicated is not of congressional creation. In such a situation, substantial inroads into functions that have traditionally been performed by the Judiciary cannot be characterized merely as incidental extensions of Congress’ power to define rights that it has created. Rather, such inroads suggest unwarranted encroachments upon the judicial power of the United States, which our Constitution reserves for Art. III courts.

[Northern Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 69-70, 102 S.Ct. 2858 (1983);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17768408304219861886]

Note the quote above:

“The distinction between public rights and private rights has not been definitively explained in our precedents. Nor is it necessary to do so in the present cases, for it suffices to observe that a matter of public rights must at a minimum arise “between the government and others.”

[Northern Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 69, 102 S.Ct. 2858 (1983);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17768408304219861886]

They are ADMITTING what they DON’T like talking about because it’s a Third Rail Issue, which is the difference between PUBLIC and PRIVATE and how one gets converted to the other. They even showed you that they wanted to avoid it in this case. Consequently, this is MOST of what YOU should talk about in front of them if you want to shut them up and avoid being called frivolous.

The above quotes also explain why if you want to be totally free and avoid government obligations, for instance, that you shouldn’t use or invoke any STATUS in their franchise code when communicating with them and must CREATE your own definitions and anti-franchise that only YOU own and therefore CONTROL. The DEFINITION section of civil statutes in fact is where the status is CREATED and OWNERSHIP of its CREATOR is established. PUBLIC RIGHTS (privileges) are then assigned to that civil statutory status elsewhere in the franchise contract or code. If no OBLIGATIONS attach to the status like that of “nonresident alien”, then its NOT their property and they don’t control people who invoke it. If you do use their definitions, you surrender all PRIVATE rights and exchange them for PUBLIC privileges (which are also sometimes DECEPTIVELY called “rights”). Remember: All rights are property. PUBLIC rights are PUBLIC property, PRIVATE rights are PRIVATE, constitutionally and not statutorily protected property. Watch out!

On Why You MUST Define Franchise “words of art” on all Government Forms and How to Do It
https://ftsig.org/on-why-you-must-define-franchise-words-of-art-on-all-government-forms-and-how-to-do-it/

6. U.S. Supreme Court Agrees that Electing (voluntarily invoking) the “Citizen of the United States” Civil Status by filing a 1040 Return Makes You a “Taxpayer” on Worldwide Earnings

The fact that the “citizen* of the United States****(government, not geography)” that the income tax is imposed upon in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) is a voluntary franchise office actually makes it much harder to understand and convey to others.

“A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and of that state or country only.”
[19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §886 (2003)]

---

“A foreign corporation is one that derives its existence solely from the laws of another state, government, or country, and the term is used indiscriminately, sometimes in statutes, to designate either a corporation created by or under the laws of another state or a corporation created by or under the laws of a foreign country.”

“A federal corporation operating within a state is considered a domestic corporation rather than a foreign corporation.  The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.”  
[19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §883 (2003)]

Most think, “Because I’m a ‘citizen,’ I am a ‘U.S. person.'” But it’s an election that transcends domicile, and the franchisee is a CIVIL “citizen**+D” within the civil jurisdiction of the “United States.”

“In other words, the principle was declared that the government, by its very nature, benefits the [person who ELECTS the CIVIL STATUTORY FRANCHISE STATUS OF] citizen [on a 1040 Tax form like Cook did] and his property wherever found and, therefore, has the power to make the benefit complete. Or to express it another way, the basis of the power to tax was not and cannot be made dependent upon the situs of the property in all cases, it being in or out of the United States, and was not and cannot be made dependent upon the domicile of the citizen, that being in or out of the United States, but upon his relation [CIVIL FRANCHISE STATUS ELECTION] as citizen to the United States and the relation of the latter to him as citizen. The consequence of the relations is that the native citizen who is taxed may have domicile, and the property from which his income is derived may have situs, in a foreign country and the tax be legal — the government having power to impose the tax.

[Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47, 56 (1924);SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10657110310496192378]

The U.S. Supreme Court in the above HID the main source of its jurisdiction to enforce upon Cook by NOT mentioning that the ORIGIN of it was his “election” to be treated as a privileged CIVIL/DOMICILED Citizen**+D by filing a 1040 form at the time and checking the box labelled “Are you a citizen or resident of the United States”. At the time, there was no such thing as a “U.S. person”. That came later in 1972. See for yourself:

Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924), Citizenship of George W. Cook, Exhibit #01.025
https://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX01.025-CookVTait-Citizenship.pdf

They didn’t have the 1040-NR form at the time and only had the 1040, and that form required an election to be a “U.S. person”. That election process was first offered on the 1920 1040 form so that people could OPT OUT and choose nonresident alien by simply NOT checking that box. Today, you make the same election by simply filing the 1040 and avoid the election by filing the 1040-NR. This is why it is imperative to file the CORRECT FOREIGN tax return, the 1040-NR, and properly aver status in all litigation as “Citizen of the State of New York and resident of the borough of Brooklyn” (for example).

The OPPOSITE of the Cook v. Tait case above was that of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1 (1916) before the Supreme Court. In that case, Frank Brushaber properly averred his status in his pleading and was recognized as a nonresident alien by the IRS in Treasury Decision 2313. He averred it EXACTLY the same as in Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan and Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429, 158 U.S. 601 (1895) which declared the first income tax unconstitutional. You can read about the Brushaber case at:

1. Official Supreme Court Transcript of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), SEDM Exhibit #09.031
   https://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX09.031.pdf
2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/brushaber-v-union-pacific-railroad-company-240-u-s-1-1916/
3. Frank R. Brushaber Genealogical Records, SEDM Exhibit #09.034
   https://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX09.034.pdf
4. Significance of the Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), Family Guardian
   https://ftsig.org/brushaber-v-union-pacific-railroad-company-240-u-s-1-1916/
5. An Investigation Into the Meaning of the Term “United States”, Family Guardian
   https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/ChallJurisdiction/Definitions/freemaninvestigation.htm
6. Non-Resident Non-Person Position, Form #05.020, Sections 6.4.1, 12.6.11
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/NonresidentNonPersonPosition.pdf

7. SSN is the License to Use or Consume Government/Public Property

Within the “trade or business” franchise, the SSN then functions as the de facto “license” issued by U.S. Inc to permit YOU as a VOLUNTEER to use or consume GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC property for a fee. It also functions as an accounting mechanism to LOCATE such property. That property can include formerly PRIVATE property you donate to a public use by “effectively connecting” it on a tax return and even yourself, when you volunteer for the “U.S. person” office by filing the 1040 tax return.

This is why the word “INTERNAL” appears in the phrase “INTERNAL Revenue Service”. Government/public property is INTERNAL to the United States federal corporation. “U.S. person” then becomes a registered agent or an office or position domiciled in the District of Columbia while the VOLUNTEER filling said position or office can have a domicile ANYWHERE per 26 C.F.R. §301.7701(b)-2. The act of APPLYING for an SSN, TIN, or EIN is in fact the act of BECOMING such a “registered agent” in an otherwise legislatively/CIVILLY foreign jurisdiction.

Beyond becoming a registered agent, the number then functions in practical effect as what the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) calls a “franchise mark”.

“A franchise entails the right to operate a business that is “identified or associated with the franchisor’s trademark, or to offer, sell, or distribute [GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC] goods, services, or commodities that are identified or associated with the franchisor’s trademark.” The term “trademark” is intended to be read broadly to cover not only trademarks, but any service mark, trade name, or other advertising or commercial symbol. This is generally referred to as the “trademark” or “mark” element.

The franchisor [the government] need not own the mark itself, but at the very least must have the right to license the use of the mark to others. Indeed, the right to use the franchisor’s mark in the operation of the business – either by selling goods or performing services identified with the mark or by using the mark, in whole or in part, in the business’ name – is an integral part of franchising. In fact, a supplier can avoid Rule coverage of a particular distribution arrangement by expressly prohibiting the distributor from using its mark.”
[FTC Franchise Rule Compliance Guide, May 2008;
SOURCE: http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus70-franchise-rule-compliance-guide]

The legal consequence of USING the franchise mark in connection with a specific transaction then becomes a PUBLIC/GOVERNMENT franchise, which the FTC defines as:

“. . .a commercial business arrangement [e.g. a STATUTORY “trade or business” under 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26)] is a “franchise” if it satisfies three definitional elements. Specifically, the franchisor must:
(1) promise to provide a trademark or other commercial symbol [e.g. the STATUTORY Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number];
(2) promise to exercise significant control or provide significant assistance in the operation of the business [e.g. enforcement of the franchise “code” such as the Internal Revenue Code Subtitles A and C]; and
(3) require a minimum payment of at least $500 during the first six months of operations [e.g. tax refunds annually, deductions most Americans DO NOT need because of EXCLUSIONS in 26 U.S.C. §872 because not from GEOGRAPHICAL “U.S.”, stimulus checks, etc].”
[FTC Franchise Rule Compliance Guide, May 2008, p. 1;
SOURCE: http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus70-franchise-rule-compliance-guide]

More on the subject of this section at:

About SSNs and TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/AboutSSNsAndTINs.pdf

8. Then WHAT does FOREIGN and DOMESTIC Really Mean?

Earlier tax regulations give us a HUGE clue about the the meaning of the terms “FOREIGN” and “DOMESTIC” for income tax purposes:

26 C.F.R. §301.7701-5 Domestic, foreign, resident, and nonresident persons (2003)

A domestic corporation is one organized or created in the United States, including only the States (and during the periods when not States, the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii), and the District of Columbia, or under the law of the United States or of any State or Territory. A foreign corporation is one which is not domestic. A domestic corporation is a resident corporation even though it does no business and owns no property in the United States. A foreign corporation engaged in trade or business within the United States is referred to in the regulations in this chapter as a resident foreign corporation, and a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business within the United States, as a nonresident foreign corporation. A partnership engaged in trade or business within the United States is referred to in the regulations in this chapter as a resident partnership, and a partnership not engaged in trade or business within the United States, as a nonresident partnership. Whether a partnership is to be regarded as resident or nonresident is not determined by the nationality or residence of its members or by the place in which it was created or organized.
[Amended by T.D. 8813, Federal Register: February 2, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 21), Page 4967-4975]

[Click here for for more authorities on “domestic”]

Based on the above, we can see that the income tax is NOT a tax on “nationality” per say as an American National born anywhere in the COUNTRY “United States”. This is because those who are “nationals of the United States” are ALSO recognized as “nonresident aliens” in 26 U.S.C. §873. Instead, it’s a tax on the use and consumption of government PRIVILEGES/PUBLIC property. Those participating in the “trade or business” excise taxable franchise are INSIDE and INTERNAL to the government, PUBLIC, and DOMESTIC. Those not participating are OUTSIDE the government, PRIVATE, and FOREIGN. The courts agree with this conclusion:

“A franchise is said to be a right reserved to the people by the constitution, as the elective franchise. Again, it is said to be a privilege conferred by grant from government, and vested in one or more individuals, as a public office. Corporations, or bodies politic are the most usual franchises known to our laws.”
[People v. Ridgley, 21 Ill. 65, 1859 WL 6687, 11 Peck 65 (Ill., 1859)]

The U.S. Supreme Court agrees with the above by admitting that the income tax is a tax on THE GOVERNMENT and those (agents and officers) INSIDE the government and not a GEOGRAPHY when it held:

“In the latter character, it was admitted that the power of levying direct taxes might be exercised, but for District purposes only, as a state legislature might tax for state purposes; but that it could not legislate for the District under Art. I, sec. 8, giving to Congress the power “to lay and collect taxes, imposts and excises,” which “shall be uniform throughout the United States,” inasmuch as the District was no part of the United States. It was held that the grant of this power was a general one without limitation as to place, and consequently extended to all places over which the government extends; and that it extended to the District of Columbia as a constituent part of the United States.“
[Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9926302819023946834]

Notice the phrase “without limitation as to place”. This PROVES it’s a NON-GEOGRAPHICAL tax. And if it IS in fact “non-geographical” there is NO POINT in arguing about the definition of statutory geographical “United States” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10). We can see from the above quote therefore that the income tax also isn’t on a specific GEOGRAPHY, but upon PROPERTY or OFFICES WITHIN the government WHEREVER THEY ARE FOUND anywhere in the WORLD. PROPERTY and OFFICES, after all, are technically the ONLY thing the government consists of to begin with. As a matter of fact, OFFICES themselves are just property consisting of PRIVILEGES and OBLIGATIONS that are both property. The ability to regulate or tax PRIVATE property that is OUTSIDE the government and therefore FOREIGN and protected by the Bill of Rights and NOT the statutory code, in fact, is repugnant to the Constitution.

9. President Obama Agrees You Work for the Government as an Officer if you Call Yourself a “Citizen”/U.S. person

What, pray tell, could be BETTER than a tax on ONLY the government? This gives a WHOLE NEW meaning and context to the phrase that Abraham Lincoln used in his now famous Gettysburg Address “A government OF the people, BY the people, and FOR the people”, doesn’t it? And it’s also COMPLETELY consistent with what President Obama said in his Farewell Address on January 10, 2017 when he proudly and confidently and forcefully declared that a [CIVIL/DOMICILED] “citizen**+D” is the most IMPORTANT OFFICE (in the government, and therefore a PUBLIC office). Listen for yourself starting at 5:45:

President Obama Admits in His Farewell Address that “citizen” is a public office, Exhibit #01.018
https://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX01.018-39-45-20170110-Obama%20Farewell%20Speech.mp4

In the above video, President Obama complains that it should be EASIER to vote not harder. If voting wasn’t tied to domicile and therefore tax liability, there would be FAR LESS downside to registering to vote and FAR more people would vote. Low voter turnout would be solved IMMEDIATELY if our political system was not dysfunctionally organized as a “pay-to-play” social compact system like it is now where you have to become a cow on a government tax farm called a “U.S. person” to be qualified and authorized to vote. Why can’t people register to vote WITHOUT having to accept or consent to any PERSONAL civil or financial privileges and without voting on the expenditures that fund those PERSONAL privileges in a clear and dangerous financial conflict of interest that can cause a democracy to literally and fiscally SELF DESTRUCT under the massive fiscal weight of the welfare state? Our democracy is disintegrating before our eyes with over 80% of the federal budget spent on entitlements and an enormous $39Trillion dollar public debt, all because of the welfare state where people can vote themselves a benefit increase. This is a CRIME! See 52 U.S.C. §10307(c):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/10307

We did a Copilot AI search for authorities on the evils of a democracy that allows people to vote to increase their government “benefits” and here is what we got: CENSORED!

QUESTION: Can you give me a link to a view by a government official that discusses the downside of allowing people to vote to increase their government benefits?

ANSWER: Looks like I can’t respond to this topic. Explore Bing Search results.

It therefore seems that the only thing left the government really wants to protect is any effort to prevent its own FISCAL SUICIDE! But please be careful, a dying beast like ours is at its most dangerous.

The implication of the above is that you have a right to NOT be a government/public officer or agent called a CIVIL Citizen**+D and if you DON’T, then you’re literally a slave and a peon to pay off an endless and rapidly growing mountain of public debt. Why? Because a public agent is someone who owes a duty to the government and involuntary servitude is prohibited by the constitution so you must be a volunteer.

“A public officer is one who has some duty [CIVIL OBLIGATION] to perform concerning the public; and he is not the less a public officer when his duty is confined to narrow limits [such as “taxpayer”], because it is the duty, and the nature of that duty, which makes him a public officer, and not the extent of his authority.‘ 7 Bac. Abr. 280; Carth. 479…. Where an employment or duty is a continuing [***65] one, which is defined by rules prescribed by law and not by contract, such a charge or employment is an office, and the person who performs it is an officer….”

[Ricker’s Petition, 66 N.H. 207 (1890);
SOURCE: https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/PublicOffice-Ricker_s%20Petition_%2066%20N.H.%20207.pdf]

In addition, the legally enforceable duty or “civil obligation” mentioned above that a public officer has to the government grantor of the office represents a PROPERTY interest in YOUR services that is called a “Right”. The Fifth Amendment forbids the taking of PRIVATE property such as your services from you without JUST and FAIR compensation. So at some point, you had to consent to PROCURE the office, and that consent in most cases was manifested every time you invoked ANY civil status or tax status legislatively created, granted, and therefore OWNED by its human creator, the government, on a government form. See:

Avoiding Traps in Government Forms Course, Form #12.023
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/AvoidingTrapsGovForms.pdf

The act of filling out and submitting the form in effect represents a PETITION to your SUBSTITUTE pagan god, as someone you nominated to replace the real and living God as the source of your law, provision, and protection. It functions like a prayer for a “benefit” or “blessing” to your pagan god for some form of relief or commercial benefit. To get the benefit, you have to in effect PLEDGE yourself into servitude and all your property as surety for whatever that god commands or requires you to do. Here is what scripture says about using the power of God to benefit yourself commercially or firing God and replacing Him with a new pagan government god and state-sponsored religion that will “benefit” you commercially such as with “Socialist Insecurity”:

The Sorcerer’s Sin

¹⁴ Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, ¹⁵ who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit. ¹⁶ For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. ¹⁷ Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.

¹⁸ And when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money, ¹⁹ saying, “Give me this power also, that anyone on whom I lay hands may receive the Holy Spirit.”

²⁰ But Peter said to him, “Your money perish with you, because you thought that the gift of God could be purchased with money! ²¹ You have neither part nor portion in this matter, for your heart is not right in the sight of God. ²² Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. ²³ For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity.”

²⁴ Then Simon answered and said, “Pray to the Lord for me, that none of the things which you have spoken may come upon me.”

²⁵ So when they had testified and preached the word of the Lord, they returned to Jerusalem, preaching the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans.

[Acts 8:14-25, Bible, NKJV]

That is why petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court are called “prayers”. In that sense, government has become god, “benefits” become blessings, and “taxes” are tithes to a state sponsored church. This new American civil religion that fires God and replaces it with pagan government is thoroughly documented in:

Socialism: The New American Civil Religion, Form #05.016
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SocialismCivilReligion.pdf

This problem is THE major source of corruption within the entire government, as documented in:

How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardian Fellowship
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm

To try to CENSOR any connection between public BENEFITS or PROPERTY and the legal and spiritual and religious conflicts and ANTI-BIBLICAL IDOLATRY they create as documented herein is in effect to PROTECT and expand SIN and government corruption.

When the government arrogates to itself a role in religious affairs, it abandons its obligation as guarantor of democracy. Democracy requires the nourishment of dialogue and dissent, while religious faith puts its trust in an ultimate divine authority above all human deliberation. When the government appropriates religious truth, it “transforms rational debate into theological decree.” Nuechterlein, Note, The Free Exercise Boundaries of Permissible Accommodation Under the Establishment Clause, 99 Yale L.J. 1127, 1131 (1990). Those who disagree no longer are questioning the policy judgment of the elected but the rules of a higher authority who is beyond reproach. [505 U.S. 608]

Madison warned that government officials who would use religious authority to pursue secular ends

“exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The People who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.”

Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments (1785) in The Complete Madison 300 (S. Padover, ed.1953). Democratic government will not last long when proclamation replaces persuasion as the medium of political exchange.

Likewise, we have recognized that “[r]eligion flourishes in greater purity, without than with the aid of Gov[ernment].”{11} Id. at 309. To “make room for as wide a variety of beliefs and creeds as the spiritual needs of man deem necessary,” Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306, 313 (1952), the government must not align itself with any one of them. When the government favors a particular religion or sect, the disadvantage to all others is obvious, but even the favored religion may fear being “taint[ed] . . . with a corrosive secularism.” Grand Rapids School Dist. v. Ball, 473 U.S. 373, 385 (1985). The favored religion may be compromised as political figures reshape the religion’s beliefs for their own purposes; it may be reformed as government largesse brings government regulation.{12} Keeping religion in the hands of private groups minimizes state intrusion on religious choice, and best enables each religion to “flourish according to the [505 U.S. 609] zeal of its adherents and the appeal of its dogma.” Zorach, 343 U.S. at 313.

It is these understandings and fears that underlie our Establishment Clause jurisprudence. We have believed that religious freedom cannot exist in the absence of a free democratic government, and that such a government cannot endure when there is fusion between religion and the political regime. We have believed that religious freedom cannot thrive in the absence of a vibrant religious community, and that such a community cannot prosper when it is bound to the secular. And we have believed that these were the animating principles behind the adoption of the Establishment Clause. To that end, our cases have prohibited government endorsement of religion, its sponsorship, and active involvement in religion, whether or not citizens were coerced to conform.

[Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992);
SOURCE: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=505&page=577]

It is therefore patently ANTI-AMERICAN and even ANTI-GOD to try to censor information about this connection between IDOLATRY created by benefits, privileges, and franchises and the First Amendment violations these things cause from the public square or public discourse.

“Where do wars and fights [in the ballot box and the jury box] come from among you? Do they not come from your desires for pleasure [unearned money from the government] that war in your members [and your democratic governments]? You lust [after other people’s money] and do not have. You murder [the unborn to increase your standard of living] and covet [the unearned] and cannot obtain [except by empowering your government to STEAL for you!]. You fight and war [against the rich and the nontaxpayers to subsidize your idleness]. Yet you do not have because you do not ask [the Lord, but instead ask the deceitful government]. You ask and do not receive, because you ask amiss, that you may spend it on your pleasures. Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship [“U.S. Person”, “taxpayer”, CIVIL Citizen**+D status] with the world [or the governments of the world] is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend [CIVIL legal membership of ANY kind within the secular world] of the world [or the governments of the world in the form of an office, position, tax status, or civil status] makes himself an enemy of God.”

[James 4:4 , Bible, CSB]

Instead, God says this is the way to approach the subjects of public benefits and property:

Loving and Working

⁹ About brotherly love: You don’t need me to write you because you yourselves are taught by God to love one another. ¹⁰ In fact, you are doing this toward all the brothers and sisters in the entire region of Macedonia. But we encourage you, brothers and sisters, to do this even more, ¹¹ to seek to lead a quiet life, to mind your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you, ¹² so that you may behave properly in the presence of outsiders and not be dependent on anyone.

[1 Thess. 4:9-12, Bible, NKJV]

And by the way, for the purposes of this website, a “public officer” is legally defined as someone “in charge of the [PUBLIC] property of the government”. Simply being ELIGIBLE to receive such a PRIVILEGE or public “benefit” is enough to make you a public officer. As a bare minimum, that office or civil status itself is the “property” that the person volunteering for the office is in charge of, and possibly more. Click here for the amazing proof of that.

10. The Income Tax is “Rent” on the Use of the “U.S person” Identity that delivers Privileges and Benefits.

If these inferences were NOT true, why would the U.S. Supreme Court say the following?

“The constitutional right [Form #10.015] against unjust taxation [of PRIVATE, constitutionally protect property] is given for the protection of private property [Form #12.046], but it may be waived by those affected who consent [Form #05.003] to such action to their property as would otherwise be invalid [or even ILLEGAL or CRIMINAL].”

[Wight v. Davidson, 181 U.S. 371, 377 (1901);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1202751686859480675]

The income tax therefore behaves as a “rent an identity” service, where the “U.S. person”, CIVIL “citizen**+D”, and CIVIL “resident” status wrapped up WITHIN it are the PRIVILEGED identity being “rented” for a fee. The Internal Revenue SERVICE is there to SERVICE club members called “taxpayers”. “U.S. person” functions in effect like a Costco Membership Card for a VOLUNTARY CIVIL Private Membership Association (PMA) governed by club rules called CIVIL STATUTES. Members are agents and officers of the collective group. Those who are NONMEMBERS are called FOREIGN and NONRESIDENTS. The SSN/TIN is the Membership Number printed on that card. The Federal Trade Commission calls that number a “franchise mark”. The Bible calls that franchise mark “The Mark of the Beast”. Everything that Member Number attaches to then becomes:

“PRIVATE PROPERTY donated to a public use to TACITLY procure the ‘benefits’ of a government franchise, including CIVIL STATUTORY protection, taxation, and regulation”.

It’s a “subscription service” and you have to make an “election” (a tacit form of CONSENT) to acquire that membership and the “U.S. citizen” benefits BUNDLED with it. “Members” of the franchise club are legally described as DOMESTIC and PUBLIC, while “nonmembers” are legally described as FOREIGN and PRIVATE. The definition of “PRIVATE” in Black’s Law Dictionary even confirms this:

PRIVATE. Affecting or belonging to private individuals, as distinct from the public generally. Not official; not clothed with office. People v. Powell, 280 Mich. 699, 274 N.W. 372, 373, 111 A.L.R. 721.

[Blacks Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 1358]

---

PRIVATE PERSON. An individual who is not the incumbent of an office.

[Blacks Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 1359]

A synonym for PRIVATE is the word “idiot” as defined in the amazing article below:

Are You an “Idiot”?, SEDM
https://sedm.org/are-you-an-idiot-we-are/

The U.S. Supreme Court CONFIRMED that the exercise of your First Amendment right of POLITICAL and LEGAL association to acquire that MEMBERSHIP is the MAIN method of SURRENDERING your constitutional rights when it held:

When one becomes a member of society, he necessarily parts with some rights or privileges which, as an individual not affected by his relations to others, he might retain. “A body politic,” as aptly defined in the preamble of the Constitution of Massachusetts, “is a social compact by which the whole people covenants with each citizen, and each citizen with the whole people, that all shall be governed by certain laws for the common good.” This does not confer power upon the whole people to control rights which are purely and exclusively private, Thorpe v. R. & B. Railroad Co., 27 Vt. 143; but it does authorize the establishment of laws requiring each citizen to so conduct himself, and so use his own property, as not unnecessarily to injure another. This is the very essence of government, and 125*125 has found expression in the maxim sic utere tuo ut alienum non lædas. From this source come the police powers, which, as was said by Mr. Chief Justice Taney in the License Cases, 5 How. 583, “are nothing more or less than the powers of government inherent in every sovereignty, . . . that is to say, . . . the power to govern men and things.” Under these powers the government regulates the conduct of its citizens one towards another, and the manner in which each shall use his own property, when such regulation becomes necessary for the public good. In their exercise it has been customary in England from time immemorial, and in this country from its first colonization, to regulate ferries, common carriers, hackmen, bakers, millers, wharfingers, innkeepers, &c., and in so doing to fix a maximum of charge to be made for services rendered, accommodations furnished, and articles sold. To this day, statutes are to be found in many of the States upon some or all these subjects; and we think it has never yet been successfully contended that such legislation came within any of the constitutional prohibitions against interference with private property. With the Fifth Amendment in force, Congress, in 1820, conferred power upon the city of Washington “to regulate . . . the rates of wharfage at private wharves, . . . the sweeping of chimneys, and to fix the rates of fees therefor, . . . and the weight and quality of bread,” 3 Stat. 587, sect. 7; and, in 1848, “to make all necessary regulations respecting hackney carriages and the rates of fare of the same, and the rates of hauling by cartmen, wagoners, carmen, and draymen, and the rates of commission of auctioneers,” 9 id. 224, sect. 2.

From this it is apparent that, down to the time of the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, it was not supposed that statutes regulating the use, or even the price of the use, of private property necessarily deprived an owner of his property without due process of law. Under some circumstances they may, but not under all. The amendment does not change the law in this particular: it simply prevents the States from doing that which will operate as such a deprivation.

[Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113, 124-125 (1877);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6419197193322400931]

The “membership” they are talking about above is NOT your “political status” as a Fourteenth Amendment “citizen* of the United States***” born in a Constitutional State or a “national and citizen* of the United States** at birth” under 8 U.S.C. §1401 born within the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress because neither of these is always a product of your choice and consent. Both of these, by the way, are the origin of your POLITICAL status and NATIONALITY, and NOT your CIVIL STATUS. Instead, it’s one of the following forms of VOLUNTARY and CONSENSUAL CIVIL membership:

1. The exercise of your right to contract that implements your right to associate under the First Amendment. This INCLUDES all “elections” within the Internal Revenue Code. This is usually implemented with a voluntary franchise of some kind, such as a license, a permit, or a benefit:
   Government Franchises Course, Form #12.012
   PDF: https://sedm.org/LibertyU/GovFranchises.pdf
   VIDEO: http://youtu.be/vnDcauqlbTQ
2. Choosing a VOLUNTARY civil DOMICILE within a specific political group and thereby JOINING the “State” as a political member, voter, jurist, “person”, “taxpayer”, CIVIL/Domiciled Citizen**+D, etc. Domicile implements a Private Membership Association. (PMA) called the “State” and it has “club dues” called income taxes. That PMA is a “civil protection franchise”. See:
   Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #05.002
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/Domicile.pdf

You can learn more about the above two methods of surrendering your rights at:

1. Authorities on Membership, SEDM
   https://sedm.org/authorities-on-membership/
2. How You Lose Constitutional or Natural Rights, Form #10.015
   https://sedm.org/Forms/10-Emancipation/HowLoseConstOrNatRights.pdf

In the case of American Nationals (POLITICAL but not CIVIL members) born ANYWHERE in the country “United States”, there is NO LEGAL RELATIONSHIP WHATSOEVER between any specific geography and whether you as a physical human occupant WITHIN that geography are either FOREIGN or DOMESTIC. Such people are NONRESIDENTS everywhere in the world per the presence test in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b). They must therefore make some kind of ELECTION to come under the CIVIL jurisdiction of the national government and thereby be treated “as if” they are at least LEGALLY present within the exclusive jurisdiction of that government but not PHYSICALLY present.

“Since the corporate personality is a fiction, although a fiction intended to be acted upon as though it were a fact, Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19, 24, it is clear that unlike an individual its “presence” without, as well as within, the state of its origin can be manifested only by activities carried on in its behalf by those who are authorized to act [AGENTS and OFFICERS such as “taxpayers” and “persons”] for it. To say that the corporation is so far “present” there as to satisfy due process requirements, for purposes of taxation or the maintenance of suits against it in the courts of the state, is to beg the question to be decided. For the terms “present” or “presence” are used merely to symbolize those activities of the corporation’s agent [OFFICER] within the state which courts will deem to be sufficient to satisfy the demands of due process. L. Hand, J., in Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, 45 F.2d 139, 141. Those demands may be met by such contacts [or FRANCHISES, which are ALSO contracts] of the corporation with the state of the forum as make it reasonable, in the context of our federal system of government, to require the corporation to defend the particular suit which is brought there. An “estimate of the inconveniences” which would result to the corporation from a trial away from its “home” or principal place of business [tax home, 26 C.F.R. §301.7701(b)-2(c)] is relevant in this connection. Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, supra, 141.”
[International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316-317 (1945); SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5514563780081607825]

Those SUBSCRIBERS or MEMBERS acting as agents of the the government corporation (28 U.S.C. §3002(15)(A)) on behalf of the “State” (the people as a collective) are LEGALLY “in the State” while on duty as MEMBERS. They are LEGALLY but not PHYSICALLY present within the government CORPORATION as its agents and officers. They then become the FICTIONAL “persons” described in I.R.C. 6671(b) for civil enforcement and I.R.C. 7343 for CRIMINAL enforcement. A statutory privilege against an agent or officer of the government corporation then becomes a right AGAINST its government owner rather than merely the human animating the office. This is also why many freedom advocates like to describe themselves as “ON THE LAND but not IN THE STATE”. To cancel your subscription as an American National:

1. Merely change the STATUS of the Membership Number to “foreign” in the IRS records by filing a 1040-NR return under the authority of 26 C.F.R. §301.6109-1(g). OR
2. Revoke the number entirely. OR
3. Stop using it as authorized under 26 C.F.R. §301.6109-1(b). OR
4. Merely define any number provided to private parties as NOT a STATUTORY number but rather a license to the GOVERNMENT instead of you under the authority of your OWN anti-franchise franchise. The government can’t interfere with that approach because the ability to define is a Legislative function that Executive Branch employees such as the IRS cannot lawfully engage in AND because they would be be violating the separation of powers and criminally tampering with a witness to do so. That is the approach taken by this website and SEDM.ORG. See:
   About SSNs and TINs on Government Forms and Correspondence, Form #05.012, Section 19
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/AboutSSNsAndTINs.pdf

If there ever even WAS such as thing as a REAL “Revocation of Election” that is LAWFUL and not a scam like most such things offered today, the above would HAVE to be it. Click here for our position on “Revocations of Election” (in the About->What We Reject->Frivolous Subject: Revocation of Election (ROE) menu at the top).

11. Why Seeking Government Privileges/Public Property is Extremely Damaging to Your Liberty

Those seeking “benefits”, “privileges”, and all OTHER forms of PUBLIC/GOVERNMENT property ultimately become slaves and chattel on the government farm because the very ORIGIN of Congress’ ability to tax and regulate is possession, use, custody, or “benefit” of PUBLIC property or PUBLIC services under Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution and 5 U.S.C. §301, and they can tax or regulate literally ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD where their property is found:

People of all races, genders, political beliefs, sexual orientations, and nearly all religions are welcome here. All are treated equally under REAL “law”. The only way to remain truly free and equal under the civil law is to avoid seeking government civil services, benefits, property, special or civil status, exemptions, privileges, or special treatment.  All such pursuits of government services or property require individual and lawful consent to a franchise and the surrender of inalienable constitutional rights AND EQUALITY in the process, and should therefore be AVOIDED.  The rights and equality given up are the “cost” of procuring the “benefit” or property from the government, in fact.  Nothing in life is truly “free”.  Anyone who claims that such “benefits” or property should be free and cost them nothing is a thief who wants to use the government as a means to STEAL on his or her behalf. All just rights spring from responsibilities/obligations under the laws of a higher power.  If that higher power is God, you can be truly and objectively free.  If it is government, you are guaranteed to be a slave because they can lawfully set the cost of their property as high as they want as a Merchant under the U.C.C.    If you want it really bad from people with a monopoly, then you will get it REALLY bad. Bend over.  There are NO constitutional limits on the price government can charge for their monopoly services or property.  Those who want no responsibilities can have no real/PRIVATE rights, but only privileges dispensed to wards of the state which are disguised to LOOK like unalienable rights.  Obligations and rights are two sides of the same coin, just like self-ownership and personal responsibility.  For the biblical version of this paragraph, read 1 Sam. 8:10-22.  For the reason God answered Samuel by telling him to allow the people to have a king, read Deut. 28:43-51, which is God’s curse upon those who allow a king above them.  Click Here for a detailed description of the legal, moral, and spiritual consequences of violating this paragraph.
[FTSIG]

Violating the above is how you as an American National, for instance, transition from being a “nonresident alien” and a “non-person” to a “nonresident alien individual” who they can tax and regulate by virtue of being in receipt of a privilege under such provisions as 26 U.S.C. §873 relating to “trade or business” (effectively connected) deductions by nonresident aliens. This is documented in:

Acquiring a Civil Status, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/acquiring-a-civil-status/

Those with a foreign tax status such as “nonresident aliens”, even if they do DONATE their private property to a PUBLIC use by taking privileged “trade or business” (effectively connected) deductions against it are STILL not eligible for other privileges or “benefits” such as:

1. 2020 Recovery Rebates under 26 U.S.C. §6428(d)(1).
2. Additional 2020 Recovery Rebates under 26 U.S.C. §6428A(d)(1).
3. 2021 Recover Rebates under 26 U.S.C. §6428B(c)(1).
4. Affordable Care Act (ACA) participation and mandates. See:
   4.1. 26 U.S.C. §5000A(d)(3). The “national of the United States**” is a TERRITORIAL/POLITICAL “national of the United States” under 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22) and not a Fourteenth Amendment citizens. This is because “United States” in the phrase “national of the United States**” means the statutory geographical “United States**” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) and 4 U.S.C. §110(d), not states of the Union.
   4.2. Questions and answers on the individual shared responsibility provision, Question 7, IRS
   https://www.irs.gov/affordable-care-act/individuals-and-families/questions-and-answers-on-the-individual-shared-responsibility-provision

The purpose of this site is not to deprive the government of revenue for the services it provides or to promote irresponsibility on your part in refusing to pay for the services or benefits you use. People should always feel a moral obligation pay for the property and services they CONSENT and ASK in writing to consume. They should NOT, however, be forced to pay for privileges or property they don’t want or have to pay for more than they want through BUNDLING of wanted services with those that are UNWANTED.

“A person is ordinarily not required to pay for benefits which were thrust upon him with no opportunity to refuse them. The fact that he is enriched is not enough, if he cannot avoid the enrichment.” Wade, Restitution for Benefits Conferred Without Request, 19 Vand. L. Rev. at 1198 (1966).
[Siskron v. Temel-Peck Enterprises, 26 N.C.App. 387, 390 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975)]

The purpose of this website instead is to offer people a real and meaningful choice about the LEVEL or EXTENT of the government CIVIL services that they consume and therefore should feel obligated to pay for. It seems those who provide said services:

1. Would like you to believe that you HAVE no such choice.
2. Want to make the process of procuring your consent COMPLETELY invisible so that you are never unambiguously informed how to withdraw it or “unvolunteer”. This is typically done with “implied consent” through some vague, incompletely specified action in violation of due process of law. This sad state of affairs is anathema to mandate of the Declaration of Independence that all just powers of government derive from the CONSENT of the governed, which implies that everything not EXPLICITY and knowingly consensual is inherently UNJUST.
3. By taking the above approach, are implementing what we call “weaponization of the government”, whereby monopolistic anti-competitive behavior ensures that all government services become an unconscionable adhesion contract where not only is no competition possible, but the government puts everyone out of business who tries to offer an alternative choice like they did with the Founder of Libertarianism, Lysander Spooner, who was forced our of business for providing private postal services that cost less than the Post Office:
   https://ftsig.org/weaponization-of-government/

The result of HAVING REAL choice as documented on this website is that all of the facts and evidence on this website could be so corrosive to government revenue that they are all Third Rail Issues that people in the government would have to literally commit “commercial or occupational suicide” to even discuss accurately on the public record. That is why you will NEVER find this kind of FORBIDDEN information on any government website or even court ruling.

If you REALLY want to be “left alone” by the government, which is what legal “justice” is defined as, talk ACCURATELY, PRECISELY, FEARLESSLY, and INCESSANTLY about NOTHING but these issues, which have never been labelled as frivolous because to even call them frivolous, they have to talk about them and rebut them in detail rather than just hyper-emotionalize the issue to try to CLOSE your mind with the Dunning-Kruger effect. Talk so precisely, that there is no room for the sophist equivocators to put out the fire of freedom with “words of art” that they can use to make you LOOK like you are frivolous. It’s JUST as frivolous, by the way, for any government to NOT DIRECTLY address the issues raised on this website, to AVOID, to IGNORE, to CENSOR, or to DENY an appeal (cert) involving these issues as is very common among those who LOVE money but HATE freedom and the Constitution. Equivocation, sophistry, and words of art are their ONLY weapons they have to HIDE the method of CONSENT they need to get your permission to receive PRIVATE property from you in the form of money. Once they lose that ability, the only thing left are to use guns, lawless force, and anarchy to get what they want if you don’t consent to give it to them. When you speak precisely about the Achilles heel of their power discussed on this website, they will have no choice but to run like cockroaches when the light of TRUTH comes on. Precision of and freedom of speech on this subject is the light of TRUTH that kills the virus of legal ignorance and apathy at the heart of all government corruption.

‘Where would we really find the principal danger to civil liberty in a republic? Not in the governors as governors, not in the governed as governed, but in the governed unequipped to function as governors. The chief enemies of republican freedom are mental sloth, conformity, bigotry, superstition, credulity, monopoly in the market of ideas, and utter, benighted ignorance. Relying as it does on the consent of the governed, representative government cannot succeed unless the community receives enough information to grasp public issues and make sensible decisions. As lights which may have been enough for the past do not meet the needs of the present, so present lights will not suffice for the more extensive and complex problems of the future. Heretofore public enlightenment may have been only a manifest desideratum; today it constitutes an imperative necessity. The First Amendment, says Justice Black, ‘reflects the faith that a good society is not static but advancing, and that the fullest possible interchange of ideas and beliefs is essential to attainment of this goal.’ (From Feldman v. United States, 322 U.S. 487, 501, 64 S.Ct. 1082, 1088, 88 L.Ed. 1408 (dissenting opinion).)’ Cahn, supra, p. 102.

[Adderley v. State of Fla., 385 U.S. 39, 56, 87 S.Ct. 242 (U.S.Fla. 1966); SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10641909224290088946]

The corrupting influence of seeking government services or property that he is referring to is called “privileges” in legal parlance. For a list of authorities on the subject, see:

Proof of Facts: Authorities on Privileges and Benefits, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-authorities-on-privileges-and-benefits/

For a commentary on the above video, see:

Paul Harvey on Income Taxes with Rebuttal, SEDM
https://sedm.org/paul-harvey-on-income-taxes-with-rebuttal/

12. How government and private industry hide this information and dissuade American Nationals from pursuing it

There are a number of tactics taken by the Government and the IRS to hide this information, dissuade American Nationals from using it, and in effect punishing them for pursing it. This section summarizes those unscrupulous tactics and reveals a vast conspiracy by each branch of the government to avoid, interfere with, punish, and obfuscate attempts by American nationals from using it. They represent a “diabolically orchestrated”, narcissistic, and satanic plan to undermine the constitution and implement a de facto government as described in:

De Facto Government Scam, Form #05.043
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/DeFactoGov.pdf

The MAIN way of undermining the constitution documented on this site is to HIDE or AVOID the requirement for EXPRESS, INFORMED consent that is the ONLY lawful basis to surrender PRIVATE rights or convert them to PUBLIC rights.

Invisible Consent, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/

Thus, there is LEGAL DECEPTION (Form #05.014) implemented by EQUVOCATION and OMISSION, motivated mainly by covetousness of public servants and in violation of their FIDUCIARY OATH to protect ABSOLUTELY OWNED PRIVATE PROPERTY (Form #14.018) that is the ONLY subject of the Bill of Rights:

“As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer. [1]  Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts. [2]   That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves. [3]  and owes a fiduciary duty to the public. [4]   It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual. [5]   Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official which tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy.[6]”

[63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247]

__________________

FOOTNOTES:

[1] State ex rel. Nagle v Sullivan, 98 Mont 425, 40 P.2d. 995, 99 A.L.R. 321; Jersey City v Hague, 18 N.J. 584, 115 A.2d. 8.

[2] Georgia Dep’t of Human Resources v. Sistrunk, 249 Ga. 543, 291 S.E.2d. 524. A public official is held in public trust.  Madlener v. Finley (1st Dist) 161 Ill.App.3d. 796, 113 Ill Dec 712, 515 N.E.2d. 697, app gr 117 Ill Dec 226, 520 N.E.2d. 387 and revd on other grounds 128 Ill.2d. 147, 131 Ill.Dec. 145, 538 N.E.2d. 520.

[3]Chicago Park Dist. V. Kenroy, Inc., 78 Ill.2d. 555, 37 Ill.Dec. 291, 402 N.E.2d. 181, appeal after remand (1st Dist) 107 Ill.App.3d. 222, 63 Ill.Dec.134, 437 N.E.2d. 783.

[4] United States v. Holzer (CA7 Ill) 816 F.2d. 304 and vacated, remanded on other grounds 484 U.S. 807, 98 L.Ed.2d. 18, 108 S.Ct. 53, on remand (CA7 Ill) 840 F.2d. 1343, cert den 486 U.S. 1035, 100 L.Ed.2d. 608, 108 S.Ct. 2022 and (criticized on other grounds by United States v. Osser (CA3 Pa) 864 F.2d. 1056) and (superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in United States v Little (CA5 Miss) 889 F.2d. 1367) and (among conflicting authorities on other grounds noted in United States v. Boylan (CA1 Mass) 898 F.2d. 230, 29 Fed.Rules.Evid.Serv. 1223).

[5] Chicago ex rel. Cohen v Keane, 64 Ill.2d. 559, 2 Ill.Dec. 285, 357 N.E.2d. 452, later proceeding (1st Dist) 105 Ill.App.3d. 298, 61 Ill.Dec. 172, 434 N.E.2d. 325.

[6]Indiana State Ethics Comm’n v. Nelson (Ind App) 656 N.E.2d. 1172, reh gr (Ind App) 659 N.E.2d. 260, reh den (Jan 24, 1996) and transfer den (May 28, 1996).

12.1. Legislative Branch

1. Terms surrounding this issue describe what they are NOT, and not what they ARE. This is because Congress cannot civilly DEFINE what they have no jurisdiction over or property interest in. Thus, terms describing the position are not “definitions” in a legal sense because they do not accurately and completely describe all things that are INCLUDED in the definition.
   1.1. “foreign person” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1441-1(c)(2).
   1.2. “nonresident alien” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B).
2. Terms surrounding the issue use the word “includes” and “including” in their definition so that everything that is included is not indicated. 26 U.S.C. §7701(c). Thus, the statutes fail the Constitutional requirement for “reasonable notice”, which requires that every thing or class of things encompassed by the definition must be described.
   2.1. The constitutional requirement for reasonable notice is described in:
   Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf
   2.2. Definitions of terms used in connection with the nonresident alien position include:
   2.2.1. “United States” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9).
   2.2.2 “Employee” in in 26 U.S.C. §3401(c).
3. The CONTEXT of terms surrounding the issue are deliberately unspecified and vague.
   3.1. This renders it impossible to determine who the statute applies to and thus fails the constitutional requirement for reasonable notice described in:
   Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf
   3.2. Confusion or equivocation of contexts is a FAVORITE tool of sophists to hide the requirement for your consent. See:
   Legal Deception, Propaganda, and Fraud, Form #05.014, Section 18.1
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/LegalDecPropFraud.pdf
   3.3. Contexts that are equivocated include:
   3.3.1. “United States”, which can be LEGAL/CORPORATE or GEOGRAPLICAL in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9).
   3.3.2. “person”, which can be PRIVATE/CONSTITUTIONAL or PUBLIC/STATUTORY in 26 U.S.C. §6671(b) and 26 U.S.C. §7343.
4. Because the term “nonresident alien” contains the word “alien”, legally ignorant people hearing the term will inevitably do the following (social engineering):
   4.1. Falsely PRESUME that it includes only foreign nationals and not American Nationals. IRS Publication 519 perpetuates this illusion by only mentioning ALIENS. They have no SIMILAR publication for Nonresident Aliens who are “nationals” and not “aliens”.
   4.2. Avoid using the term to describe themselves.
5. Because terms surrounding the foreign issue are NOT legally defined, then:
   5.1. People are left with doubt about whether they satisfy the term. A confused or ignorant mind always says no and avoids uncertainty.
   5.2. Those wishing to PROVE they have the status cannot satisfy the burden of proving a NEGATIVE. It is difficult and sometimes impossible to prove a negative.
6. They invented TWO terms to describe “nonresidents”:
   6.1. “nonresident aliens” in 26 U.S.C. §871. This group includes both ALIENS and American NATIONALS.
   6.2. “non-resident aliens” in 26 U.S.C. §864. This group consists of ONLY aliens and foreign nationals.
7. The WITHHOLDING provisions in 26 U.S.C. §1441 are imposed against NONRESIDENT ALIENS in 26 U.S.C. §871, rather than the more proper “NON-RESIDENT ALIENS” in 26 U.S.C. §864.
   7.1. The definition of “individual” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1441-1(c)(3) includes only ALIENS and excludes NATIONALS.
   7.2. These WITHHOLDING provisions therefore DO NOT APPLY to American Nationals AT ALL!
   7.3. IRS NEVER states this in their publications or their website and withholding agents aren’t aware of this, so you have to get into an argument with everyone you do business with to educate them about these distinctions and to lawfully avoid both withholding and reporting as an American National who is a nonresident alien.
   For Proof of the above, see:
   Lawfully Avoiding Foreign Person Withholding, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/lawfully-avoiding-foreign-person-withholding/

12.2. Judicial Branch

1. Federal judges are FORBIDDEN by statute from declaring what the terms “mean” surrounding the issue in order to resolve ambiguities.
   1.1. The Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C. §2201(a) forbids declaratory judgments relating to the terms for those who are SUBJECT to federal law but not for those who are NOT such as PRIVATE and FOREIGN parties.
   1.2. Thus, the deliberate ambiguity and violation of due process involved in the construction of the statutes can NEVER be resolved by judges except among those who sue under the common law and equity instead of the statutes.
2. Caselaw on the Nonresident Alien Position is nearly nonexistent.
   2.1. VERY few cases on the subject appear in the public record because the courts don’t want to spill the beans on this subject and open the flood gates of sheep exiting the government farm.
   2.2. Courts do this by making cases on the subject unpublished so that they cannot be relied upon to sustain a position by anyone else. See:
   http://www.nonpublication.com/
   2.3. The need for litigating the subject is avoided because tax returns are promptly processed and returns issued so that subsequent litigation that would expose this issue is not necessary.
   2.4. The lack of evidence in the public record makes it more difficult to prove your position to business associates, who usually insist on court precedents as a way to validate the position.
3. Federal courts such as the Court of Claims are deliberately MISAPPLYING the presence test in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) to American Nationals in constitutional states. The presence test applies ONLY to “alien individuals” and never NATIONALS. They do this to deceive American Nationals into believing that:
   3.1. “United States” includes constitutional states, even though the term in fact is NON-GEOGRAPHICAL and LEGAL throughout most of the Internal Revenue Code.
   3.2. They have “taxable income” from “sources within the United States“, even though the “United States” is the government and not a geography in the case of an American who is a nonresident alien.
   3.3. They are NOT “nonresident aliens“. The term is never even LEGALLY DEFINED, so that’s RIDICULOUS!
   
   For examples of this phenomenon, see Walby v. United States, 144 Fed.Cl. 1 (2019), Walby v. United States, 957 F.3d. 1295 (2020). Read the following article REBUTTING these FRAUDULENT rulings:
   PROOF OF FACTS: The “Presence Test” excludes States of the Union in the Case of American Nationals who are “Nonresident Aliens”, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-the-presence-test-excludes-states-of-the-union-in-the-case-of-american-nationals-who-are-nonresident-aliens/
4. The U.S. Supreme Court HID the METHOD by which Cook CONSENTED to be taxed and how that consent was manifested in the landmark case of Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47, 56 (1924). They said he was subject to the Income tax on WORLDWIDE earnings but didn’t indicate HOW he consented to BECOME subject, which was the filing of a 1040 return at the time and answering YES to the question: “Are you a citizen or resident of the United States?”. Thus, they INTERFERED with giving CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED REASONABLE NOTCE (Form #05.022) to the American public that their consent was required to BECOME a privileged “citizen” (public office, not POLITICAL Citizen*) under the tax code and HOW they consented. Thus, they made the consent INVISIBLE. The Chief Justice at that time was William Howard Taft, who was also the former president who PROPOSED the Sixteenth Amendment and later got it FRAUDULENTLY ratified. See:
   Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302, Sections, 5.2.14.2, 6.7.1
   https://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm

12.3. Executive Branch

1. IRS Publication 519 perpetuates the illusion that there is no such thing as an American National who is a “nonresident alien”.
   1.1. It only mentions “aliens” in connections with “nonresident aliens”.
   1.2. It doesn’t mention “nationals of the United States” who are “nonresident alien INDIVIDUALS” and how they became “individuals”. They do this IN SPITE of the fact that such things are recognized in 26 U.S.C. §873 in connection with American Nationals taking privileged deductions.
   1.3. It applies the presence test to determine who are “nonresident aliens”, even though the Presence Test in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) only applies to “alien individuals” and never American Nationals by default. 26 U.S.C. §937 and 26 C.F.R. §1.937-1 apply the presence test to American Nationals to possessions, but only as a foreign affairs function in relation to Congress’ exclusive jurisdiction in possessions and not in relation to constitutional states.
2. The 1040-NR tax return in its present form OMITS mention of “nationals of the United States” as being eligible to file as a nonresident alien.
   2.1. “national of the United States” was directly listed on the return as being eligible from 1980 to 1983.
   2.2. “U.S. nationals” were listed on the return as being eligible to file as from 1984-2017.
   See for yourself! Look at:
   Tax Return History: Citizenship, Family Guardian Fellowship
   https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Citizenship/TaxReturnHistory-Citizenship/TaxReturnHistory-Citizenship.htm
3. The processing of 1040-NR returns is compartmentalized at only ONE of the MANY service centers of the IRS in Austin, Texas.
   3.1. This ensures that people at the other service centers do not get wind of the NRA approach.
   3.2. If you send a 1040-NR return to the WRONG location, they will try to penalize the return as frivolous because the people at the other service centers aren’t allowed to know about the NRA position.
4. The ONLY source of jurisdiction within constitutional states of the Union originates in either federal property or foreign affairs functions.
   4.1. Foreign affairs relates ONLY to aliens and never NATIONALS or American NATIONALS.
   4.2. By including BOTH ALIENS and NATIONALS under the “nonresident alien” umbrella, they can use abuse equivocation (sophistry) to deceive legally ignorant American Nationals into their tax scam.
   4.3. Since American NATIONALS in Constitutional states, unlike ALIENS, are not subject to foreign affairs functions then the only jurisdiction over them then becomes PROPERTY under Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution.
   4.4. IRS therefore deliberately never tells you that the TAX STATUS or CIVIL STATUS of “nonresident alien”, “person”, “taxpayer”, and “individual” are in fact the ONLY property the government created and owns that they can use to control the average American National and that pursuit or benefit of all such forms of property are voluntary. See:
   Policy Document: IRS Fraud and Deception About the Statutory Word “Person”, Form #08.023
   https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/IRSPerson.pdf

12.4. Private Industry

1. IRS knows that most withholding agents are financial institutions that have a vested interest to ensure that you provide an SSN or TIN so they can use the number for asset recovery, Anti-Money-Laundering (AML) (Form #05.044) , accounting, and credit reporting purposes.
   1.1. However, “nonresident aliens” not engaged in a “trade or business” are not required to have or use these numbers per 26 U.S.C. §301.6109-1(b). This also exempts them from Know Your Customer (KYC) rules at FINTECH firms as well. See Form #09.084.
   1.2. The result of not using these numbers encourages fraud on the part of their own employees and depositors, such as the massive Wells Fargo fraud where bank employees opening hundreds of thousands of unenumerated and unauthorized accounts to get employee bonuses and the fraud went unnoticed for years without SSNs on the new accounts. They were massively fined for doing so.
   1.3. Therefore, even though American Nationals are correct in insisting on unenumerated accounts, financial institutions asking for withholding paperwork sometimes push back on efforts to open unenumerated nonprivileged accounts using the W-8BEN (Form #04.202). They do this so they can track their customers like animals and destroy ALL their rights for the sake of “business efficiency”, AML compliance, asset recovery, and credit reporting purposes. They also use these numbers for their CHEX system as well to report bounced checks so that bad actors are blacklisted. Thus, those seeking NRA accounts or positions, like those engaged in marijuana sales and crypto, are subject to private economic sanctions by being illegally targeted and discriminated against with “debanking” or “unbanking”.
   1.4. The banking industry has also vociferously resisted attempts by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to implement regulations that forbid banking discrimination against NRAs seeking unenumerated accounts and others. Their first attempt to do so has been met with protracted litigation. Nevertheless, some states are implementing laws anyway to forbid such illegal discrimination and economic sanctions by banks. Click here (OFFSITE LINK) for details.
   1.5. Unscrupulous tactics abused by financial institutions to resist opening unenumerated NRA accounts include:
   1.5.1. Playing STUPID and just PRESUMING that all “nonresident aliens” are “aliens”, and that American nationals are not ALIENS.
   1.5.2. To put legally ignorant clerks who don’t read the law in charge of opening new accounts and claiming ignorant when you confront them with the law.
   Click here (Form #04.202) for proof of the above and look at section 14.
2. For those American Nationals who DO NOT know that they are “foreign” but NOT “foreign persons” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1441-1 and are NOT subject to FOREIGN PERSON WITHHOLDING or REPORTING, all the methods for escaping withholding or reporting require them to engage in privileged “trade or business” (Form #05.001) or to make some kind of “election” that:
   2.1. Makes them privileged.
   2.2. Makes them an “individual” even though they are not UNTIL they pursue the PRIVILEGE of deductions under 26 U.S.C. §162 and 26 U.S.C. §873.
   2.3. Makes them and a “taxpayer”.
3. There are NO software tools available to file as a nonresident alien. Turbotax ONLY supports DOMESTIC returns.
4. Tax preparation franchise businesses like Jackson Hewitt and H&R Block ONLY accept RESIDENT (1040) tax returns under the FALSE presumption that American Nationals in states of the Union are DOMESTIC and not “overseas” under 26 U.S.C. §911. One of our members ran such a franchise and can attest to this FRAUD.

12.5. Summary

IRS astutely knows that people naturally will always take the path of:

1. Least resistance, where they can avoid arguments with withholding agents or business associates who don’t know that “foreign person” in 26 U.S.C. §1441 and 26 C.F.R. §1.1441-1 excludes American Nationals.
2. Least complexity. The 1040 and the W-4 are simpler than the 1040-NR and W-8BEN respectively.
3. Least effort, where they can avoid having to read or learn the law by just doing what everyone else does.
4. Greatest convenience, reward, or benefit. The ability to take deductions or receive a benefit or credits by doing something adds a powerful incentive to just about anything. Unfortunately, all these things are privileges that have a price tag or obligation attached to them.

The tactics in this section ensure that if human nature takes its natural course, YOU as an American National, will:

1. Avoid preserving and declaring and implementing your natural default status as a “nonresident alien”.
2. Avoid arguments with withholding agents, corporate counsel, and your business associates by submitting a W-9 instead of the more proper W-8BEN.
3. Make an “invisible election” (invisible consent) to become a privileged “U.S. person” by filing a 1040 form instead of the more proper 1040-NR form because it is SIMPLER and requires you to know less. This status, after all, has far more deductions available to it than a nonresident alien and has no Foreign Person withholding associated with it.

The combined result of the above is LITERAL slavery mainly through legal ignorance manufactured in the public FOOL/SCHOOL system (Form #05.055), being maximally privileged, paying the MOST tax, and being a peon on a legal leash who pays tax on their WORLDWIDE earnings EVERYWHERE and doesn’t even know how they became a slave to begin with. Velcome to gulag Amerika, Comrade!

To prove the above yourself, see:

1. META AI: “Nonresident Alien” v. “non-resident alien”, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/meta-ai-nonresident-alien-v-non-resident-alien/
2. META AI: Is a “NATIONAL OF THE UNITED STATES” A “FOREIGN PERSON” under 26 U.S.C. 1441?, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/meta-ai-is-a-national-of-the-united-states-a-foreign-person/
3. Lawfully Avoiding Foreign Person Withholding, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/lawfully-avoiding-foreign-person-withholding/
4. Foreign Person Reporting and Withholding Summary, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/foreign-person-reporting-and-withholding-summary/

13. Conclusions

Now do you know why we often to say:

Governments are founded to provide protection for PRIVATE property and PRIVATE rights. The first stage in that protection is to LEAVE such property alone and not tax or regulate it. Justice itself is defined as the right (not the privilege) to be LEFT ALONE by everyone, INCLUDING the government.

What is “Justice”?, Form #05.050
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhatIsJustice.pdf

Like any mafia, corrupt governments only protect themself. In practice, they implement the OPPOSITE of justice by NEVER LEAVING YOU ALONE and CONSTANTLY harassing you until you pay them “protection money” called “taxes” to procure the PRIVILEGE of being left alone. Any attempt to turn “justice” into this kind of taxable privilege represents the WORST form of injustice as documented in Section 5.3. of the above.

Civil statutes (franchises) only protect the government from you and never you from the government. You have to join the government as a public officer straw man called a civil “person”, “individual”, “taxpayer”, etc. to receive ANYTHING from them. Their services and property you asked for are then rendered or paid or rendered to the straw man office they created and own, and never to you in your private capacity. Thus, they are the ONLY real “beneficiary” of everything they do:

Why Government is the Only Real Beneficiary of All government Franchises, Form #05.051** (Member Subscriptions)
https://sedm.org/product/why-the-government-is-the-only-real-beneficiary-of-all-government-franchises-form-05-051/

In practical effect, government as a security guard has MANDATED that you must DONATE whatever PRIVATE property you want them to protect and convert it to PUBLIC property before they will protect it or even RECOGNIZE it. Hence, the term “REAL property”. Its unreal if it isn’t party to a franchise with them called the CIVIL code. Only by connecting/DONATING PRIVATE property to a voluntary office can the property be CIVILLY protected. This is the origin of the phrase “effectively connected”, in fact. The existence of that office, civil status, or tax status is legal evidence of your consent to participate in the civil statutory protection franchise and Private Membership Association (PMA) called “domicile”. Income taxes in effect are “club dues” for voluntary members. Those members are called CIVIL**+D DOMICILED “citizens” and “residents” and “taxpayers”. They are NOT called POLITICAL/CONSTITUTIONAL Citizens* or even Fourteenth Amendment “citizens of the United States”, because an act of birth is not an act of choice or consent.

Would you KNOWINGLY hire a PRIVATE security guard to protect your property who insisted on OWNING everything you want them to protect?

NEVER!

Statutes that only protect PUBLIC/DOMESTICE/GOVERNMENT property are not needed for those who are FOREIGN, PRIVATE, and protected only by the Bill of Rights, the common law, and equity. Are you PRIVATE or PUBLIC?

The idea behind the Thirteenth Amendment and the First Amendment are SELF-OWNERSHIP. You own yourself and have a right to control your body and your property and what other people use either for. All PUBLIC/DOMESTIC PRIVILEGES that attach to you or your property therefore are a TAKING or DIMINUTION of some aspect of that ownership.

1. The most IMPORTANT aspect of that self-ownership is the right to decide WHAT LAW protects that ownership and what law DOES NOT. This is an exercise of the “right to exclude” aspect of ownership.
2. NO ONE can choose that law FOR you and if they do, they are implementing SLAVERY.
3. You only have TWO choices or SOURCES for the law that you choose to protect that ownership:
   3.1. Common law and the Bill of Rights.
   3.2. Civil statutory franchise codes.

The ability to even legislatively WRITE definitions that affect your SELF-OWNERSHIP requires that those WRITING the definitions have some degree of OWNERSHIP over some aspect of yourself or your property that they could ONLY have acquired by your consent in some form. Those definitions DO NOT and CANNOT affect or include any aspect of YOU or YOUR PROPERTY unless and until your consent in some form has LAWFULLY been acquired by VOLUNTARILY choosing a CIVIL STATUS or TAX STATUS. Once you do that, the OBLIGATIONS attached to the status UNAVOIDABLY “come alone for the ride” and become the CONSIDERATION that pays for the delivery of the benefits of the PUBLIC status. See:

Lawfully Avoiding Government Obligations Course, Form #12.040
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/AvoidGovernmentObligations.pdf

But of course, government will never inform you that you have that choice, because if most people realized that, they would UNVOLUNTEER! See:

Invisible Consent, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/

Based on the introduction of the subject of foreign tax status on this page, the ONLY rational choice of law is the following and NO court and NO constitution can lawfully interfere with it:

Choice of Law, Litigation Tool #01.010
https://sedm.org/Litigation/01-General/ChoiceOfLaw.pdf

Only the legally ignorant, the irresponsible, or the depraved would make any choice other than the above.

“My [God’s] people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you from being priest for Me; Because you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children.
[Hosea 4:6, Bible, NKJV]

---

“One who turns his ear from hearing the law [God’s law or man’s law], even his prayer is an abomination.”
[Prov. 28:9, Bible, NKJV]

---

“The hand of the diligent will rule, But the lazy man will be put to forced labor.“
[Prov. 12:24, Bible, NKJV]

---

“But this crowd that does not know [and quote and follow and use] the law [God’s Law] is accursed.”
[John 7:49, Bible, NKJV]

The result of the above choice of law in fulfillment of the legislative intent of the Thirteenth Amendment and the First Amendment is that you INEVITABLY BECOME or REMAIN FOREIGN, PRIVATE, and a CIVIL “non-person”. Anyone who INTERFERES with that choice of law that ONLY you can make is interfering with the First Amendment right to practice your religion and intends to make you a SLAVE. If you don’t make that choice properly, God promises the following CURSE:

Curses of Disobedience [to God’s Laws]

“The alien [Washington, D.C. is legislatively “alien” in relation to states of the Union] who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower [malicious destruction of EQUAL PROTECTION and EQUAL TREATMENT by abusing FRANCHISES].  He shall lend to you [Federal Reserve counterfeiting franchise], but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail.

“Moreover all these curses shall come upon you and pursue and overtake you, until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the voice of the Lord your God, to keep His commandments and His statutes which He commanded you.  And they shall be upon you for a sign and a wonder, and on your descendants forever.

“Because you did not serve [ONLY] the Lord your God with joy and gladness of heart, for the abundance of everything,  therefore you shall serve your [covetous thieving lawyer] enemies, whom the Lord will send against you, in hunger, in thirst, in nakedness, and in need of everything; and He will put a yoke of iron [franchise codes] on your neck until He has destroyed you.  The Lord will bring a nation against you from afar [the District of CRIMINALS], from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flies [the American Eagle], a nation whose language [LEGALESE] you will not understand,  a nation of fierce [coercive and fascist] countenance, which does not respect the elderly [assassinates them by denying them healthcare through bureaucratic delays on an Obamacare waiting list] nor show favor to the young [destroying their ability to learn in the public FOOL system].  And they shall eat the increase of your livestock and the produce of your land [with “trade or business” franchise taxes], until you [and all your property] are destroyed [or STOLEN/CONFISCATED]; they shall not leave you grain or new wine or oil, or the increase of your cattle or the offspring of your flocks, until they have destroyed you.
[Deut. 28:43-51, Bible, NKJV]

The result of choosing UNWISELY is documented in:

How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardian Fellowship
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm

The result of choosing WISELY is described below:

“Come out from among them
And be separate, says the Lord.
Do not touch what is unclean,
And I will receive you.”
¹⁸ “I will be a Father to you,
And you shall be My sons and daughters,
Says the Lord Almighty.”
[1 Cor. 6:17-18, Bible, NKJV]

This dichotomy between a WISE and an UNWISE choice is the very ORIGIN of the mandatory constitutional separation between:

1. Church and State under the First Amendment.
   Government Establishment of Religion, Form #05.038
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/GovEstabReligion.pdf
2. PUBLIC and PRIVATE under the Fifth Amendment. God owns the PRIVATE. Caesar owns the PUBLIC:
   Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form #12.025
   https://sedm.org/LibertyU/SeparatingPublicPrivate.pdf

The Bible says YOUR BODY is a TEMPLE, and thus a “church”:

“If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are.”
[1 Cor. 3:17, Bible, NKJV]

To HAND that PRIVATE temple over to a secular MALICIOUS PUBLIC “Caesar” (Babylon) is to DEFILE it in God’s eyes. That temple, by the way, is God’s ETERNAL PRIVATE property and not yours. Per Deut. 10:14, you are but a temporary trustee over it (Form #13.007) under the Bible, which is the Trust indenture or what we call:

B asic
I nstructions
B efore
L eaving
E arth

If you want a series of questions you can ask your favorite AI chatbot to validate most of what is on this page, see:

Chat GPT 3.5: Is a purely contractual franchise a governmental act in a classical sense or a PRIVATE act?, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/chat-gpt-3-5-is-a-purely-contractual-franchise-a-governmental-act-in-a-classical-sense-or-a-private-act/

Welcome to The Matrix, Neo! Agent Smith of the IRS would like to speak to you. He wants YOU to be a government agent called a “taxpayer” also, but he can’t tell you that under the terms of his Non Disclosure Agreement that protects Third Rail Issues. DOMESTIC is the name for all those WITHIN The Matrix. FOREIGN is the name for those OUTSIDE like Neo. We’re Morpheus in the movie.

There is no “magic silver bullet” or “magic piece of paper” that will release you from the LITERAL “Matrix” that is our tax system. The ONLY thing that will do that is YOU DILLIGENTLY getting legally educated and using that knowledge to communicate ACCURATELY, FORCEFULLY, and INCESSANTLY with the government about your rights and status using the correct forms, court authorities, statutes, and regulations and litigating to protect them YOURSELF if need be. No attorney gagged by a “license” from telling the WHOLE truth about the government and huge student loan debt to pay off can or will EVER do that for ANY amount of money, because most of them would be disbarred and out of a job and on the street if they did that job as documented on this site. They will never look their gift horse in the mouth by litigating a Third Rail Issue.

“The privilege against self-incrimination [Fifth Amendment] is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of their rights, nor to one who is indifferent thereto.  It is a fighting clause.  Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat.  It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor.  It is only valid when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person.”  
[U.S. v Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (1947), Emphasis added]

14. A BETTER Way

We’re not here to just COMPLAIN. All we want is REAL choice and competition about the government civil services we consume. That choice has been destroyed mainly through what we call “weaponization of the government” implemented by a combination of monopolistic control over a specific INDISPENSABLE good or service bundled with things you DON’T want and interfering with every attempt to “unbundle” those things. For example, driver licenses and government ID are abused as a method to sign you up for EVERY franchise under the sun and make you into government cattle in the process. The result is criminal identity theft for all intents and purposes. That process is defined in:

Weaponization of the Government, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/weaponization-of-government/

At the moment, the only choice the tax code gives us is a BINARY choice between being government chattel as a “U.S. person” and being completely free and a customer of nothing government offers as a “nonresident alien” and a “non-person”. This works a purpose OPPOSITE of establishing government and is needlessly coercive and extortionate. There ought to be an an intermediate choice between the two where everything is UNBUNDLED and “weaponization of the government” is eliminated. This would mandate that Americans can actually CHOOSE the SPECIFIC civil services they receive and pay for. In short, a FREE MARKET government with choice and competition for most of the services governments currently offer. THAT is the only kind of government that in truth and in fact can be “de jure” in a constitutional sense. Any government that rules by force, fraud, or IMPLIED rather than EXPLICIT consent or which has a monopoly on anything other than courts, military, jails and police is a de facto government and a usurper. If free market capitalism works in private industry, it can work just as well in most of the services government offers. Those types government services that can be privatized and subject to choice and competition we call “CIVIL SERVICES“.

We actually want to help and empower de jure governments that proceed only upon explicit consent to collect what they charge for their CIVIL SERVICES that you have signed up for in writing in advance of actually receiving them. There is a simple way to eliminate the need for ALL the government deception and chicanery documented on this site to fulfill that objective. How? Remember that government, like any business, is just a corporation that delivers actually THREE individual “products”:

1. Courts, Criminal, and Police Protection the payment of which is mandatory.
2. Military protection.
3. CIVIL Services rendered to members of the Private Membership Association (PMA) called “the State” which must ALWAYS be optional and voluntary. See:
   Website Definitions: 6. Civil Service, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/advanced/definitions/#6._Civil

Most of what government currently offers and spends most of its money on falls in the third category above. What is wrong doing the following to fund the above three items?:

1. SOVEREIGNTY:
   1.1. There is no official, judicial, or sovereign immunity. The constitution DOES NOT allow this so it is unconstitutional. They contradict the idea that all governmental powers are delegated by the PEOPLE as INDIVIDUALS. You can’t delegate what you don’t have. See:
   Najim v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc., 368 F. Supp.3d. 935 (2019)
   https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2073950510665962726
   1.2. The government deals with individual Americans on an EQUAL footing in matters that affect private property and private rights and is FORBIDDEN from converting PRIVATE to PUBLIC because it makes the government into a PREDATOR rather than PROTECTOR. See:
   Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form #12.025
   https://sedm.org/LibertyU/SeparatingPublicPrivate.pdf
   1.3. The above provisions will scare all the megalomaniacs away from public service, because they can’t abuse their office to implement privileges that DESTROY equality of TREATMENT and not OUTCOME at the heart of all just societies.
2. PROPERTY:
   2.1. All property is conclusively presumed to be absolutely owned and PRIVATE and never PUBLIC if you as an American own it.
   2.2. There are not PROPERTY taxes, because this is an oxymoron unless PUBLIC property is the only thing taxed.
   2.3. Absolute ownership implies the right to EXCLUDE the government from benefitting from your private property and thus deprive them of property taxes.
   2.4. Civil statutes are not needed to protect private property. The common law and equity alone are sufficient to protect private property, but only AFTER an injury and not before or during. Doing so is also NOT an instance of “making law”, but a fundamental recognition of the core purpose of establishing government to begin with that TRANSCENDS domicile or contracts: Protecting PRIVATE PROPERTY, and the HAPPINESS it is the source of.
3. MILITARY: Protection is paid for ONLY with excise taxes on imports, as was originally envisioned by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, of the Constitution.
4. COURT, CRIMINAL, and POLICE:
   4.1. Protection is mandatory, and funded at a national level ONLY THROUGH the payment of a fixed annual mandatory fee.
   4.2. The fee is the SAME for everyone regardless of how much they make.
5. CIVIL SERVICES:
   5.1. Any regulation of the CIVIL commercial marketplace is done through CERTIFICATIONS rather than LICENSES. Thus, those regulated don’t need to become agents or officers of the state to receive the BENEFIT of said regulation. If they fall out of line, their CERTIFICATION is simply revoked.
   5.2. Government cannot offer benefits, entitlements, social insurance, or welfare of any kind unless it is done as a PRIVATE entity in a competitive marketplace.
   5.3. Government cannot have a monopoly on CIVIL SERVICES. All are subject to choice and competition to keep them efficient.
   5.4. All CIVIL SERVICES are paid for on a VOLUNTARY tax return filed annually, in which you select from a long list of such services the ones you want, with an annual price tag attached to each.
   5.5. If you don’t submit a tax return and sign up for ANY CIVIL SERVICES, you aren’t eligible to receive them and are denied them.
   5.6. You only get the specific CIVIL SERVICES you ask for in writing and are denied all others. That way, programs that don’t serve the REAL NEEDS of what people want will die on the vine by losing their funding. People in effect VOTE with their DOLLARS what to keep and what to get rid of.

The above system would:

1. Restore the REAL source of power, which is always economic, to the hands of the people instead of the government. If competition and choice work well in private industry, they should also work well in government.
2. Restore the central importance and economic power to individuals, families, charities, and churches as the God-ordained and ONLY source of charity and grace. Kids won’t dishonor their parents and go to church because the family instead of the government will be their “safety net” like it has been for thousands of years before collectivists destroyed that.
3. A strong sense of personal responsibility and work ethic will return to the workplace, because there will no longer be a “limited liability” safety net for people to fall back on.
4. Eliminate all shared or collective ownership of property except actual land and buildings and equipment the government buys and owns.
5. Make it impossible to implement SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM, and COLLECTIVISM. Collective or SHARED or PUBLIC ownership of all property is a prerequisite to these three systems of government.
6. Implement a much fairer and just society based on equality between the GOVERNED and the GOVERNORS at least from a CIVIL perspective. You and the government will be equal in court CIVILLY because both of you can use your property to control each other, rather than the government owning or controlling EVERYTHING. This will restore the separation of powers that keeps government tyranny in check. See:
   What Is “Justice”?, Form #05.050
   https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhatIsJustice.pdf
7. Force governments to be EFFICIENT and to compete in the commercial marketplace as an equal to any other private company for the efficient delivery of any CIVIL SERVICE they offer. Thus, “weaponization of government” would be impossible. See:
   Website Definitions: 30. Weaponization of Government, FTSIG
   https://ftsig.org/advanced/definitions/#30._Weaponization
8. Remove polarization within the body politic, because there would be no need for entitlements or wealth redistribution that people can fight over in the ballot box or the jury box or using “identity politics”. The whole basis of “identity politics” is franchises and the privileges that attach to said franchises that enforce UNEQUAL treatment under the law.
9. Solve the immigration problem for the most part. Most of the people coming here want “free stuff” (entitlements), which would not be available under the new system.
10. Eliminate MOST of the corruption of politics, because there would be no wealth to redistribute. Right now, the voter booth and jury box are really just a battle ground used mainly to:
    10.1. STEAL rather than PROTECT property and redistribute wealth.
    10.2. Convert all PRIVATE property to PUBLIC property.
11. FINALLY balance the federal budget. Entitlements have MASSIVELY UNBALANCED the federal budget to the point where there is NO ROOM left for discretionary spending on REAL duties of government. Over 80% of the budget and most of the federal debt originates from spending on entitlements that have NOTHING to do with what the constitution says the government should actually be doing with its money. We are on the brink of a financial tsunami and worldwide debt crisis of biblical proportions because of the fiscal pressures on government created by the welfare state. This is not a new problem and its the easiest problem to solve if politicians weren’t so immobilized by the fact that voters will vote them out of office if they cut entitlement spending. This is the Achilles Heel of a democratic welfare state that is NOT authorized by the Constitution.
12. Entirely eliminate the complexity and length of the tax code. Right now, most of the complexity originates from efforts to:
    12.1. Dissuade you from unvolunteering by labeling the exit door with terms like “foreign”, “nonresident alien”, etc.
    12.2. DECEIVE you into volunteering without actually CALLING it volunteering using the terms “trade or business”, “effectively connected”, etc. We cover this in:
    Invisible Consent, FTSITG
    https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/
13. FORCE the elimination of the fiat currency scam which gave rise to the need of most of the chicanery documented on this site.
    13.1. Without massive entitlement spending, the need to print/counterfeit money using the fiat currency SCAM would go away.
    13.2. Money could be privatized with digital PRIVATE currency and thus eliminate the current debt based system. The banking system could no longer be used to FORCE people to become “U.S. person” public officers to open a bank account or conduct commerce. Thus, commerce would no longer be a PRIVILEGE, but a RIGHT. See:
    The Money Scam, Form #05.041
    https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/MoneyScam.pdf

Would anyone argue that the above is NOT what the founders meant in the following constitutional guarantee of a “republican government“?:

United States Constitution

Article 4: States Relations

Section 4. Obligations of United States to States

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

---

“The true foundation of republican government is the equal right of every citizen in his person and [absolutely owned private] property and in their management.”

[Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, 1816. ME 15:36; Source: http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Politics/ThomasJefferson/jeff1550.htm]

The above system would also implement what Ayn Rand referred to in her book Atlas Shrugged as “Gault’s Gulch”. See:

Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged v. SEDM Mission Statement
https://sedm.org/ayn-rands-atlas-shrugged-v-sedm-mission-statement/

If you would like an ACTUAL, REALISTIC, COMPLETE PLAN to implement the above WONDERFUL system of government which starts by KEEPING the current system but adding minimal minor things to it, see:

Self Government Federation: Articles of Confederation, Form #13.002
https://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/SGFArtOfConfed.pdf

It is our sincere hope that the information available through this website will lawfully free and empower so many tax slaves that the government will have no choice but to implement the above plan to reform a currently unjust and usurious system that no longer produces revenue as it once did.

“Better is a little with righteousness, than vast revenues without justice [Form #05.050].”
[Prov. 16:8, Bible, NKJV]

“Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, For they shall be filled.”
[Matt. 5:6, Bible, NKJV]

The original designer of our Three Branch system of government would be proud of the above plan to reform the present government. His design is documented below, but OUR design is MUCH BETTER and avoids 99% of the pitfalls we presently suffer under. Here was his original design that we based the above book on:

The Spirit of Laws, Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu
https://famguardian.org/Publications/SpiritOfLaws/sol.htm