Proof of Facts

PROOF OF FACTS: Proof that FTSIG PUB connectors are the only doctrinally consistent connectors

By ftsig-admin / May 6, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Proof that FTSIG PUB connectors are the only doctrinally consistent connectors

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Are there any additional connectors between PUB and PRI other than those in this section in the context of ftsig? Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.3: Lawful ways of connecting PUB/PRI , FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2.3._Lawful ANSWER 1: Short answer: No — within the FTSIG framework, there are only four PUB‑creating connectors,…

PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business within the United States” and “personal services within the United States” means service in a capacityPUB and not a geography

By ftsig-admin / May 4, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business within the United States” and “personal services within the United States” means service in a capacityPUB and not a geography

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: What is the definition of “personal services within the United States” ANSWER 1: Short answer: Under 26 U.S.C. § 864(b), “personal services within the United States” means any labor or services performed by an individual physically inside the United States, unless one of the statute’s narrow exclusions applies. What the statute…

PROOF OF FACTS: Congress cannot define “profit” or “income” in a constitutional sense

By ftsig-admin / May 2, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Congress cannot define “profit” or “income” in a constitutional sense

QUESTION 1: How can congress obey Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 limits on taxing propertyPRI if it can: 1. Define the deductions used to calculate profit. 2. Thus indirectly define “profit” My understanding is the congressional definitions can only affect propertyPUB, and the above definitions affect propertyPRI.…

PROOF OF FACTS: You were never expressly authorized to participate

By ftsig-admin / April 27, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: You were never expressly authorized to participate

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. EXPRESS AUTHORITIES (OR LACK THEREOF) What the Internal Revenue Code expressly authorizes — and what it does not. 1.1 — EXPRESS authority for private employersPRI to act as “employers” under 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) Statutory text 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) defines “employer” as: “the person for whom an individual performs or…

PROOF OF FACTS: Why the Income Tax Can’t be on anything BUT Public Property (propertyPUB)

By ftsig-admin / April 25, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why the Income Tax Can’t be on anything BUT Public Property (propertyPUB)

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION: The Public Rights Doctrine is the basis for the I.R.C. Subtitle A Income Tax. At the heart of the administration of this PUBLIC RIGHT are the following court approaches: The purpose of this article is to prove: If you would like proof of why the analysis in this article is…

PROOF OF FACTS: “U.S. person” is produced by either domicile or “trade or business” for a U.S. national

By ftsig-admin / April 23, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “U.S. person” is produced by either domicile or “trade or business” for a U.S. national

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes exactly how a purely political citizen* becomes a civil Citizen**+D. QUESTION 1: What do authorities say about how civil statutory obligations attach to a Fourteenth Amendment political citizen. ANSWER 1: Every controlling authority says: civil statutory obligations attach by legislative power + jurisdiction (domicile or minimum contacts), not consent.…

PROOF OF FACTS: Payment received by a “nonresident alien” U.S. National not engaged in a “trade or business” and residing in a place protected by the constitution from the United StatesG is not taxable under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)

By ftsig-admin / April 21, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Payment received by a “nonresident alien” U.S. National not engaged in a “trade or business” and residing in a place protected by the constitution from the United StatesG is not taxable under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)

STATEMENT OF FACTS: EXAMPLE APPLICATION: COPILOT REALITY CHECK: QUESTION 1: What are the relationships between the following three words: Here’s the cleanest, most precise way to understand the relationships among the four terms — as the Supreme Court uses them, as tax scholars use them, and as your FTSIG PUB/PRI framework uses them. These four…

PROOF OF FACT: Birth Occurred Outside the “United States” as Defined in Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, Clause 1

By ftsig-admin / April 15, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACT: Birth Occurred Outside the “United States” as Defined in Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, Clause 1

The undersigned was born in the residuum of sovereignty of the California state. As a matter of fact, and pursuant to the 10th Amendment, this birth occurred within the exclusive Subject Matter Residuum of Sovereignty of said equal-footing State as established in Coyle v. Smith, 221 U.S. 559 (1911). Although the State and the Federal…

PROOF OF FACTS: You were Never Lawfully Issued a “Social Security Number”

By ftsig-admin / April 8, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: You were Never Lawfully Issued a “Social Security Number”

0. Introduction Thesis: The Social Security Trap: Why You Were Never Assigned a Privileged “Resident” Number To the casual observer, a Social Security Number is just a nine-digit ID. However, a closer parsing of federal regulations reveals a profound distinction between the “individual” who allegedly works for “wages” and the “Brand Name” entity (franchise) owned…

PROOF OF FACTS: Why CIVIL statutory “citizen” of the United States in 26 U.S.C. 1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary

By ftsig-admin / April 3, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why CIVIL statutory “citizen” of the United States in 26 U.S.C. 1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary

INTRODUCTION: This series of facts prove that the “citizen” who is “of the United StatesF” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary for American nationals described in the Fourteenth Amendment. 1. Recognition of election 1. There is no liability statute pertaining to human beings. The phrase “liable to” instead of “liable for” doesn’t accomplish…