Proof of Facts

PROOF OF FACTS: Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine Applies to Federal Territories and Possessions

By ftsig-admin / July 4, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine Applies to Federal Territories and Possessions

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Does the unconstitutional conditions doctrine apply to areas subject to the fundamental rights doctrine? 2. List all the authorities that validate your answer. ANSWER 1: Yes. The Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine does apply in areas governed by the Fundamental Rights Doctrine. The reason is straightforward: wherever fundamental rights remain operative,…

PROOF OF FACTS: Every civil statutory status legislatively created by Congress is a Public CapacityPUB

By ftsig-admin / June 23, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Every civil statutory status legislatively created by Congress is a Public CapacityPUB

INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot. This article establishes that: The purpose of this article is NOT to provide remedy for identity theft, but merely to document it. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Can you prove that every civil statutory status or tax status created by congress is a public capacity? ANSWER 1: The short answer:…

PROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 6109(h) is how “residence” of a “taxpayer” is acquired and has nothing to do with a place of abode

By ftsig-admin / June 23, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 6109(h) is how “residence” of a “taxpayer” is acquired and has nothing to do with a place of abode

INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot. 6/23/26 This analysis proves that: The above are confirmed by an earlier definition in the regulations: 26 C.F.R. §301.7701-5 Domestic, foreign, resident, and nonresident persons (2003) A domestic corporation is one organized or created in the United States, including only the States (and during the periods when not States, the Territories of…

PROOF OF FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court is LYING to you about I.R.C. Subtitle A as a “sovereign power” and why they are lying

By ftsig-admin / May 28, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court is LYING to you about I.R.C. Subtitle A as a “sovereign power” and why they are lying

INTRODUCTION: The Corporate Crown The King stepped out, all draped in gold,With “Sovereign Power!”—or so we’re told.He spoke of Duty, Law, and Might,And how he’s “Protector” by divine right.But look past the scepter, the robes, and the lace,And a different reflection stares back from the face. The “Crown” is a logo, the “State” is a…

PROOF OF FACTS: “United States” in I.R.C. 871(b), 864(b), and 6671(b) is the United StatesGOV, not a geography

By ftsig-admin / May 12, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “United States” in I.R.C. 871(b), 864(b), and 6671(b) is the United StatesGOV, not a geography

INTRODUCTION: The main target of this site is U.S. nationals living within the exclusive jurisdiction of the states of the Union. These people are nonresident aliens by default, which means the only thing taxable for them is found in 26 U.S.C. 871. We prove that only aliens are subject to 26 U.S.C. 871(a). PROOF OF…

PROOF OF FACTS: Proof that FTSIG PUB connectors are the only doctrinally consistent connectors

By ftsig-admin / May 6, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Proof that FTSIG PUB connectors are the only doctrinally consistent connectors

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Are there any additional connectors between PUB and PRI other than those in this section in the context of ftsig? Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.3: Lawful ways of connecting PUB/PRI , FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2.3._Lawful ANSWER 1: Short answer: No — within the FTSIG framework, there are only four PUB‑creating connectors,…

PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business within the United States” and “personal services within the United States” means service in a capacityPUB and not a geography

By ftsig-admin / May 4, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business within the United States” and “personal services within the United States” means service in a capacityPUB and not a geography

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: What is the definition of “personal services within the United States” ANSWER 1: Short answer: Under 26 U.S.C. § 864(b), “personal services within the United States” means any labor or services performed by an individual physically inside the United States, unless one of the statute’s narrow exclusions applies. What the statute…

PROOF OF FACTS: Congress cannot define “profit” or “income” in a constitutional sense

By ftsig-admin / May 2, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Congress cannot define “profit” or “income” in a constitutional sense

QUESTION 1: How can congress obey Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 limits on taxing propertyPRI if it can: 1. Define the deductions used to calculate profit. 2. Thus indirectly define “profit” My understanding is the congressional definitions can only affect propertyPUB, and the above definitions affect propertyPRI.…

PROOF OF FACTS: You were never expressly authorized to participate

By ftsig-admin / April 27, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: You were never expressly authorized to participate

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. EXPRESS AUTHORITIES (OR LACK THEREOF) What the Internal Revenue Code expressly authorizes — and what it does not. 1.1 — EXPRESS authority for private employersPRI to act as “employers” under 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) Statutory text 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) defines “employer” as: “the person for whom an individual performs or…

PROOF OF FACTS: Why the Income Tax Can’t be on anything BUT Public Property (propertyPUB)

By ftsig-admin / April 25, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why the Income Tax Can’t be on anything BUT Public Property (propertyPUB)

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION: The Public Rights Doctrine is the basis for the I.R.C. Subtitle A Income Tax. At the heart of the administration of this PUBLIC RIGHT are the following court approaches: The purpose of this article is to prove: If you would like proof of why the analysis in this article is…