Proof of Facts

PROOF OF FACTS: “individual” is a public officer fiction and “U.S. source” means GOVERNMENT source

By ftsig-admin / November 17, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “individual” is a public officer fiction and “U.S. source” means GOVERNMENT source

1. Admit that “property” consists of the following: ANSWER: _____Admit ____Deny 2. Admit that by the above definition, “labor” and “services” when sold in an “arm’s length” transaction are property of the laborer rendered to the recipient of the labor or service in equal exchange for consideration at the time the services were rendered. arm’s-length,…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: “State” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(10) and “States” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) do NOT include Constitutional States

By ftsig-admin / October 26, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “State” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(10) and “States” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) do NOT include Constitutional States

1. STATEMENT OF PROOF OF FACTS 1. Taxes are “largely a political matter”. This doesn’t mean they are EXCLUSIVELY a political matter, because nonresidents are not members of the body politic. “Thus, the Court has frequently held that domicile or residence, more substantial than mere presence in transit or sojourn, is an adequate basis for…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Compelled Domicile is Unconstitutional

By ftsig-admin / October 7, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Compelled Domicile is Unconstitutional

EDITORIAL: This case provides an example of the adverse affects of being victimized by a PRESUMPTIVE domicile which the victim did NOT want to have and how to oppose it in the supreme court of the state. The presumption in this case is STATUTORY and imposed by the Legislature, but it could just as well…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Ambiguous tax statutes are to be construed against the government

By ftsig-admin / October 3, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Ambiguous tax statutes are to be construed against the government

The U.S. Supreme Court has long held that ambiguities in tax statutes are to be construed in favor of the party against whom the tax is laid. In Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, 153 (1917), the Court recognized that: “In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes it is the established rule not to extend…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: “IncludIBLE” or “includABLE”?

By ftsig-admin / September 10, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “IncludIBLE” or “includABLE”?

The main word used for equivocation about whether an earning is statutory “income” is the word “includable” v. “incluable”.  Here is the trickery involved: Legal Documents In legal documents, the use of “includable” or “includible” can have a significant impact on the interpretation of the document. For example, if a contract states that certain items…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: You’re Not the “Employee” mentioned in 26 U.S.C. 3401(c)

By ftsig-admin / September 8, 2024 /

FALSE STATEMENT: We as a company have to to do “wage” withholding and reporting on you because we are an “employer” and you are an “employee” per the Internal Revenue Code. REBUTTAL: As a general rule, it is difficult and sometimes impossible to prove a negative, which in this case is that I am NOT…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Capital v. Income

By ftsig-admin / August 30, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Capital v. Income

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Distinguishing Between Capital and Income What it the difference between capital and income, and what is the relationship between them? This should be Basic Economics 101, but this distinction has become an economic riddle that few seem inclined to solve. The distinction between capital and income is explained in the 1913 Congressional…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Exemptions v. Exclusions

By ftsig-admin / August 25, 2024 /

SOURCE: Excluded Earnings and People, Form #14.019, Section 4; https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/ExcludedEarningsAndPeople.pdf It is CRUCIAL to understand the distinction between being CONSTITUTIONALLY EXCLUDED from income tax versus being STATUTORILY EXEMPT. The reason is that if you do NOT understand this difference and you are a purveyor of tax information, you may become the target of UNJUST and…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: “INTERNAL” within “IRS” name means inside the government and “taxpayers” work for the Treasury

By ftsig-admin / August 21, 2024 /

For an example of how to implement the above in responding to a tax collection notice, see: Using the Laws of Property to Respond to a Tax Collection Notice, Form #14.015https://sedm.org/using-the-laws-of-property-to-respond-to-a-federal-or-state-tax-collection-notice/ More like the above at: PROOF OF FACTS: What the geographical “United States” means in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-what-the-geographical-united-states-means-in-26-u-s-c-7701a9-and-a10/

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: The Creator is the Owner

By ftsig-admin / August 14, 2024 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: The Creator is the Owner

EDITORIAL: Throughout IRS publications, they frequently use the phrase “created or organized” as a way to describe things they have jurisdiction over. An act of enacting legislation is an act of creation. The creator of a thing is always the owner. A “civil status” is a fiction of law to which privileges and obligations attach.…

Read More