Posts by ftsig-admin
REFERENCE: Judicial Equivocation Terms and Methods
QUESTION 1: Produce a table documenting all the methods of judicial equivocation involving terms: Format the table as follows: For “Citizen”, statutory trigger is NOT 8 U.S.C. §§ 1401–1408. Its using United StatesJ on a government form instead of United StatesG and the effect of the Minimum Contacts Doctrine. Civil statutory obligations DO NOT attach to…
Read MoreREFERENCE: I.R.C. as a Licensing Scheme
INTRODUCTION: Introduction: The Constitutional Structure, the PUB/PRI Ontology, and the De Facto Federal Tax Regime This conversation has traced a comprehensive constitutional analysis of how federal tax law—particularly the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the Sixteenth Amendment—operates through a de facto system of public‑capacity creation that is not authorized by any express constitutional clause. The…
Read MorePROOF: Judicial Subject and Term Avoidance is Unconstitutional Exercise of Legislative Power
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Judges are not legislators. That’s reserved to the Legislative branch. 2. The most fundamental part of legislating is defining terms. 3. Thus judges can neither define or limit the definition of terms, either found in legislation or in the English dictionary. 4. To refuse to invoke or recognize (censor)…
Read MoreREFERENCE: History of “status crimes” and their Modern Equivalent- The Public Rights Doctrine
INTRODUCTION: Historical Lineage: Status Crimes → Public Rights Doctrine The discussion begins by tracing the evolution of status crimes in English poor‑law tradition — classifications such as pauper, vagabond, and idle person — which imposed civil regulation based not on wrongful acts but on conditions of dependency. Regulation applied only to those recognized as inhabitants,…
Read MorePROOF: Government says You aren’t ALLOWED to volunteer
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Introduction Conclusions INTRODUCTION This article provides evidence proving that the the government actually says the average PRIVATE American national is NOT legally allowed to volunteer. 1. Private property is NOT within the legislative jurisdiction of Congress Only within the criminal or common law and the sovereign mode of civil statutes may government…
Read MoreDEFINITION: Legal validity
INTRODUCTION: This conversation explores how AI chatbots define “legal validity”. It is between Microsoft Copilot and us on 8/17/26. It establishes three criteria for legal validity: The main point of divergence between us and doctrine is “Interpretive validity”. QUESTION 1: Define “legal validity” ANSWER 1: Legal validity has a very specific meaning in jurisprudence. It…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Techniques for making Proprietary Power under civil statutes LOOK like Sovereign Power
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Provide a detailed list of all the ways that the present government makes proprietary power look like sovereign power. Break it up into: 1. Statues 2. Regulations 3. Judges 4. Administrative Agencies Format each of the above individual secitons as a matrix with the following columns: 1. Column #1: #…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Sovereign power and proprietary power evolution, relationship to government ID, and contracting civil statutory proprietary jurisdiction out of your relationships
INTRODUCTION: More at: REFERENCE: Court practices for establishing or exercising agency or capacity, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/reference-court-practices-for-establishing-or-exercising-agency-or-capacity/ QUESTION 1: “But, except as restrained and limited by that instrument, they possess and exercise the authority of independent States, and the principles of public law to which we have referred are applicable to them. One of these principles is, that…
Read MorePROOF: Tax Code is a State Sponsored Religion
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: According to 1 USC 204 legislative notes, title 26 has never been enacted into positive law. Thus: 1. It is prima facie evidence of law. 2. Prima facie means PRESUMED. 3. Presumptions that impair private rightsPRI and private propertyPRI violation constitutional due process. 4. Thus, the only thing it can…
Read MorePROOF: States of the Union are “foreign countries” and aliens with constitutional states do not satisfy the presence test in I.R.C. 7701(b)
INTRODUCTION: This article PROVES: LIARS! Money grubbers! If you’re an alien physically residing within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state, we have a new acronym for you: IRS:I = I’mR = ReallyS = Stupid The following articles ALSO prove that this same alien earns NO income under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)! More at: DEFINITIONS: Tax…
Read More