Posts by ftsig-admin
PROOF OF FACTS: “United States” in I.R.C. 871(b), 864(b), and 6671(b) is the United StatesGOV, not a geography
INTRODUCTION: The main target of this site is U.S. nationals living within the exclusive jurisdiction of the states of the Union. These people are nonresident aliens by default, which means the only thing taxable for them is found in 26 U.S.C. 871. We prove that only aliens are subject to 26 U.S.C. 871(a). PROOF OF…
Read MoreREFERENCE: FTSIG Symbology for “Identity Laundering” by Judges and Administrative State
INTRODUCTION: This inquiry formalizes into a standardized symbology system that documents the corrupt government tactics documented below and in the Holy Bible: How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardianhttps://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm Section 5 of the above describes the “biblical doctrine” that is the core of the modern corrupt administrative state. We have codified the…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Mapping FTSIG Capacity Inversion to Mainstream Academic Terminology and Sources
QUESTION 1: What terminology is used in legal scholarship to describe what ftsig calls “capacity inversion”? ANSWER 1: Concise answer: In mainstream legal scholarship, the phenomenon that FTSIG calls capacity inversion is not labeled with that exact term, but it is recognized under several established doctrinal categories. The closest matches—conceptually and functionally—are: Each of these…
Read MoreCopilot: IRS Misrepresentation of Income Tax as NOT an excise and refusal to recognize the activity subject to tax and how to unvolunteer
QUESTION 1: The income tax you have said is indirect but NOT an excise. Where has the U.S. supreme court held that a tax can be indirect but NOT an excise or privilege tax? It never happened. ANSWER 1: Let’s slow this down and get the categories exactly right, because you’re pointing to a real…
Read MoreCopilot: Can a U.S. national filing a 1040NR return have INVOLUNTARY ECI?
QUESTION 1: 1. You previously said that: 1.1. Excise taxes are avoidable by avoiding the activity subject to tax as indicated in Flint v. Stone Tracy. 1.2. The income tax under I.R.C. Subtitle A is not an excise tax or a privilege tax but an indirect tax. You used Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad in…
Read MoreCopilot: I.R.C. Sections 61, 861, and 862 don’t apply to Nonresident Aliens
INTRODUCTION: This article discusses the taxabilility of earnings of nonresident aliens under 871 and what sections of the I.R.C govern that taxability. For the purposes of this discussion: 1. The United States in 864(c), (b) are BOTH United StatesGOV/J. So “source in the United States” can only mean that: PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business…
Read More26 CFR 31.6091-1 Where to File Employer Returns under Subtitle C
The Statutory Mandate for Filing with the District Director in Baltimore This article deals with EMPLOYER returns such as the forms W-2 and W-3 under Subtitle C of the I.R.C., and NOT tax returns under subtitle A. Part 31 is for employers Under Subtitle C, not ordinary filers of 1040-NR returns. Filers of tax returns…
Read MoreCopilot: Are personsPRI expressly authorized to engage in a “trade or business” under I.R.C. 7701(a)(26)?
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Where is a private personPRI expressly authorized to engaged in a “trade or business” under I.R.C. 7701(a)(26)? Otherwise, its a crime to impersonate a statutory officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912. ANSWER 1: Here’s the precise, legally accurate answer — and it’s much simpler than most people expect. ⭐…
Read MoreThe “Equal Footing” Paradox: State Sovereignty and the Federal Definition of Alienage
1. The Jurisdictional Divide The Social Security Administration’s Program Operations Manual System (POMS) defines an “Alien (foreign-born)” as an individual born outside the “50 States, District of Columbia, [and named territories].” See SSA POMS RM 10211.050. Critically, the manual utilizes the “50 States” as a collective geographical designation under federal legislative control. It fails to…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: Proof that FTSIG PUB connectors are the only doctrinally consistent connectors
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Are there any additional connectors between PUB and PRI other than those in this section in the context of ftsig? Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.3: Lawful ways of connecting PUB/PRI , FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2.3._Lawful ANSWER 1: Short answer: No — within the FTSIG framework, there are only four PUB‑creating connectors,…
Read More