Posts by ftsig-admin
FAQ: Why do judges and the administrative state fight so hard to protect the civil statutory law and the proprietary system it implements?
INTRODUCTION: Across this series of questions, a single theme emerges: the contrast between true sovereign authority and the proprietary power structures that define modern civil government. The discussion begins with a theological metaphor — the Kingdom of Heaven as the only “benign megalomaniac corporation,” a sovereign order that operates without coercion, franchise, statutory personhood, or…
Read MoreHOW TO: Burden of Proof in Establishing Extraterritorial CIVIL Jurisdiction
TABLE OF CONTENTS: APPENDIX: GEOGRAPHICAL TERMS 1. INTRODUCTION Extraterritorial civil jurisdiction is one of the most misunderstood areas of federal law. Governments often appear to exercise civil power over people and property located outside their territorial boundaries, but in the United States system this power is never inherent, never geographical, and never automatic. It must…
Read MorePROOF: Effectively Connecting is NEVER INVOLUNTARY
1. Introduction Under the USPI–INTANGIBLE Office Axiom, every statutory “trade or business,” “taxpayer,” “individual,” “person,” “service,” or “personal service” in Title 26 is an INTANGIBLE federal office domiciled in United StatesGOV (District of Columbia). INTANGIBLE offices never arise in United StatesG by default and can exist “within the United States” only after a voluntary public‑capacity…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: “trade or business within the United States”
INTRODUCTION: The phrase “trade or business within the United States” is the single most dangerous definitional gateway in all of Subchapter N. For nonresident aliens, it is the mechanism by which the government attempts to convert a private, geographically‑situated human being into an INTANGIBLE federal office — a public‑capacity persona domiciled in United StatesGOV. Nearly…
Read MoreHOW TO: Attachment for 1040-NR proving your earnings as an American national under 26 U.S.C. 871 are not taxable
INTRODUCTION: This conversation provides a precise, statute‑based and regulation‑based clarification of how 26 U.S.C. §871, Schedule NEC, ECI, and Form 1040‑NR operate exclusively within public‑capacity federal offices, not private constitutional capacity. Throughout this analysis, we correct widespread doctrinal errors—especially the judicial and administrative practice of treating statutory terms (“individual,” “person,” “taxpayer,” “trade or business”) as…
Read MoreFAQ: What kind of “foreign person” is a “national of the United States” or American National and are they affected by Involuntary Foreign Person Withholding in 26 U.S.C. 1441?
QUESTION 1: What kind of foreign person is a “national of the United States” under FTSIG Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.4? Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.4: Foreign Personhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2.4._Foreign_Person The site calls this an American National. ANSWER 1: Short answer: Under FTSIG Writing Conventions, Section 2.4 (“Foreign”), a “national of the United…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Techniques that condone, aid, and protect capacity inversion
INTRODUCTION: You, the reader, share some of the blame for why involuntary capacity inversion continues. Here is some of the evidence to prove that inference. QUESTION 1: List all the behaviors and choices made by the American Public, politicians, and the legal profession that: 1. Condone capacity inversion. 2. Aid capacity inversion. 3. Protect or…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Mainstream and FTSIG metrics for Judicial Corruption with comparison and application
INTRODUCTION: This conversation began with a simple but explosive premise: what actually happens to ordinary people when courts quietly convert them into something they never agreed to be? Cook — the man in Cook v. Tait — was living peacefully in Mexico, outside U.S. territory, outside U.S. civil franchises, outside U.S. statutory reach. Yet the…
Read MorePROOF: Domicile is a Civil Statutory Membership System
INTRODUCTION: This conversation has traced a sharp, almost surgical distinction between two different kinds of domicile—one private, one public—and uncovered a doctrinal truth that courts themselves rarely articulate: domicilePUB is not merely a “legal affiliation,” but a full civil membership franchise created by judicial innovation. Across the dialogue, four classical elements of civil membership—bilateral consent,…
Read MoreCopilot: Boundaries of public capacityPUB Across Titles of the U.S. Code
INTRODUCTION: This conversation establishes a unified doctrinal framework for understanding how public capacityPUB, statutory definitions, and constitutional statuses operate independently across the U.S. Code. The core structural insight is that federal law is siloed: capacities, liabilities, and definitions created in one title do not migrate into another unless Congress expressly commands it. This anti‑spillover architecture…
Read More