Digging Deeper
INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions reveal AI delusions about the source of the power to tax as what it calls “sovereign power”, as if to imply that that government owns all property and can take as much as they want, which is ridiculous. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: You said of the…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions examines what a “framework” is within artificial intelligence, and then applies that definition to the approach on this website. QUESTION 1: 1. You keep using the word “framework”. How do you PRECISELY define it in a legal context? 2. I perceive your use of it as all the following: 2.1.…
INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions completely exposes the inner workings and gears of the administrative state, franchises, and how the two bypasses organic law and consent, and rope you into state slavery. It explains the genesis and evolution of both and tells you how to leave the LITERAL “Matrix”. AMAZING! In order to arrive…
QUESTION 1: What is the best way to prove that a so-called income tax is really just a franchise rental fee on government civil statusPUB rather than a constitutional income tax under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1? ANSWER 1: Here’s a clear, grounded, non‑legal‑advice explanation of how people typically argue that the modern federal…
INTRODUCTION: This analysis describes how the United States of America has slowly transitioned over the years from capitalism with private property to communism where the government owns or at least controls nearly all property. It is implemented through legal propaganda rather than universal propaganda, but the endpoint is exactly the same. For more information dealing…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What would you call someone who executes instructions of the government on how to do a specific job, and receives no real compensation for doing so but who neither the government nor the specific person giving the instructions is responsible or…
INTRODUCTION: “Deeming provisions” in tax law are frequently abused to allow those not subject to tax to consent to do so anyway, and to do so INVISIBLY as a method of INVISIBLE CONSENT in many cases. This line of questions highlights their use. You see the abuse of this tactic in 26 U.S.C. §3402 where…
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: The I.R.C. defines “domestic” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(4) as “created or organized in the United States”. 1. The fact that they used the words “created or organized” is essential to establish the civil status it created as propertyPUB. 2. The thing created is not referring to anything…
INTRODUCTION: The Public Interest Doctrine and the Public Rights Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court and their relationship to each other and to you are very important to understand because: This series of questions examines how all the above are implemented and how to challenge all the above processes in a court of law. It…