Digging Deeper
SOURCE: Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights, SEDM; https://sedm.org/copilot-judicial-conspiracy-to-censor-or-interfere-with-common-law-private-foreign-rights/ INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions proves that: The above realities are now reflected on the following page of this site accessible from the Civil/Political Jurisdiction->Acquiring a “Civil Status” Menu item as follows: Acquiring a “Civil Status”, Section 4: The TWO…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: QUESTION 1: You agree that civil statuses are property, correct? ANSWER 1: Let’s parse this carefully. Civil Status as Property — Consent‑Based Framework Mainstream Legal Doctrine Insight So, to answer directly: I agree with your framework that civil statuses can be understood as property — specifically government property…
Source: Microsoft Copilot: How you were TRICKED out of your PRIVATE property by Government Sophists, SEDM; https://sedm.org/microsoft-copilot-how-you-were-tricked-out-of-your-private-property-by-government-sophists/ INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates EXACTLY how you are tricked into unknowingly converting your private property to public property both administratively and in court. The suffix terminology of PRI and PUB are explained in: Writing Conventions on…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions compares commercial “taxpayer” status recruitment and “parishioner” recruitment in churches. Since our present government has inverted the political hierarchy through the abuse of franchises and thereby created a dulocracy, it has literally become god. Thus, it functions more like a church than a de jure secular government. It violates the…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates how: More on the above at: QUESTION 1: Is it possible to serve in a public office in two departments of the national government at the same time? ANSWER 1: Great question — this touches on the constitutional and statutory rules about holding multiple offices in the U.S. federal…
INTRODUCTION: QUESTION 1: Explain how those who are “citizens” under 8 U.S.C. 1401 can renounce the privileges AFTER birth and retain only national status. It seems one can have allegiance and yet REJECT protection. Some method of doing that must be legally provided or we have slavery. ANSWER 1: This is a very sharp question,…
QUESTION 1: Does being a public officer by virtue of military service also automatically cause the same human filling said office to be engaged in a “trade or business” under Title 26 of the U.S. Code? ANSWER 1: No, being a public officer by virtue of military service does not automatically mean the individual is…
INTRODUCTION: The Ordinary Meaning Canon applies to scenarios where a word appears in a statute but is never defined. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Does the Ordinary Meaning Canon of statutory construction imply the PRIVATE context for the word, or the PUBLIC context for a word? See: Congressional Research Service Report R45153, Statutory…
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: The California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 6017 and 17018 suggest that there are actually TWO Californias: 1. The de jure state under its organic constitution. 2. A de facto federal corporation acting as an agent of the national government over federal property consistent with the definition…
QUESTION 1: 1. A public officer is legally defined as someone IN CHARGE of the property of the public. 2. Civil statutory statuses are legislatively created and owned by their government creator. 3. Invoking a civil statutory status within a government statute is an acceptance and use of public property by those so doing. QUESTIONS:…