Digging Deeper
QUESTION 1: For those wishing to PREVENT the type of equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE you have consistently demonstrated throughout this interchange, precisely WHAT predicate “fact pattern” would you suggest included in each new series of questions to completely eliminate all such equivocation? Below is our attempt at doing so, but I’m sure you can…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Would it be accurate to say that Mainstream conventions: 1. Only recognize lawfully elected or appointed officers of the United States as “public officers”. 2. Do not recognize as “public officers” those subject to civil statutory law even though though they…
INTRODUCTION: This series of AI discovery establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What authorities can you present which prove that comity implemented as privileges/franchises cannot be used to destroy the constitutional separation of powers: 1. Between the States and the Federal Government. 2. Between various branches within the government: Executive, Legislative, and…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates the symbology for representing Presence as explained below and consistently used throughout this website: Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIGSection 9: Types of CIVIL Legal Presence https://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#9._Types You can see that the symbology is CORRECTLY and PERFECTLY applied, explained, and understood as applied to the three most famous tax…
INTRODUCTION: This interchange defines where IRS sits as far as PUBLIC or PRIVATE. The VP/IP symbology referred to here is: Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIGSection 2: Two Contexts for Legal Informationhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2._Two VP means VOLUNTARY Protection and includes civil statutes and franchises. IP means INVOLUNTARY Protection and includes only the common law, the constitution, and…
QUESTION 1: Is the process documented below accurate?: Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue CodeSection 3: Consequences/Effects of Electionshttps://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/#3._Consequences ANSWER 2: Short answer: The process described in the FTSIG document is accurate to its own framework — it explains elections in the Internal Revenue Code as voluntary acts that convert private…
QUESTION 1: Can someone have a domicile under the common law but not the civil law? ANSWER 1: Excellent question — and it goes right to the heart of the distinction between civil status and common law status. Domicile Under Common Law Domicile Under Civil Law Can They Diverge? Yes — someone can have a…
SOURCE: Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights, SEDM; https://sedm.org/copilot-judicial-conspiracy-to-censor-or-interfere-with-common-law-private-foreign-rights/ INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions proves that: The above realities are now reflected on the following page of this site accessible from the Civil/Political Jurisdiction->Acquiring a “Civil Status” Menu item as follows: Acquiring a “Civil Status”, Section 4: The TWO…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: QUESTION 1: You agree that civil statuses are property, correct? ANSWER 1: Let’s parse this carefully. Civil Status as Property — Consent‑Based Framework Mainstream Legal Doctrine Insight So, to answer directly: I agree with your framework that civil statuses can be understood as property — specifically government property…