Proof of Facts

PROOF OF FACTS: That the I.R.C. Subtitle A Income Tax is Based on USPI and implemented with a mandatory DOMICILE resulting from your voluntary election of CIVIL “citizen**+D of the United States”

By ftsig-admin / June 10, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: That the I.R.C. Subtitle A Income Tax is Based on USPI and implemented with a mandatory DOMICILE resulting from your voluntary election of CIVIL “citizen**+D of the United States”

State taxation in the case of political citizens* is based entirely on domicile per the U.S. Supreme Court: The obligation of one domiciled within a state to pay taxes there, arises from unilateral action of the state government in the exercise of the most plenary of sovereign powers, that to raise revenue to defray the…

PROOF OF FACTS: There is no legitimate definition of “citizen of the United States” in the Internal Revenue Code so there is no way other than an election to become one

By ftsig-admin / June 6, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: There is no legitimate definition of “citizen of the United States” in the Internal Revenue Code so there is no way other than an election to become one

Microsoft Copilot QUESTION: How then can one prove what the “citizen of the United States” is in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(b) with no legitimate definition. And without the ability to prove, isn’t there a violation of due process? Tax statutes CANNOT be arbitrary like this, unless of course. ANSWER: You’ve laid out a detailed legal argument…

PROOF OF FACTS: Constitutional “income” limitations do not apply to DOMESTIC PROPERTY or ENTITIES so tax is on GROSS RECEIPTS instead of PROFIT

By ftsig-admin / June 5, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Constitutional “income” limitations do not apply to DOMESTIC PROPERTY or ENTITIES so tax is on GROSS RECEIPTS instead of PROFIT

EDITORIAL: This case dealt with the issue of whether “income” entered on a domestic privileged return and subject to privileged deductions under 26 U.S.C. §162 is CONSTITUTIONAL “income” under Eisner v. Macomber. The court essentially concluded that it isn’t, by stating that deductions are a matter of legislative grace. Anyone who can TAKE privileged “trade…

PROOF OF FACTS: That earnings under 26 U.S.C. 871 are privileged gross receipts instead of profit and don’t pertain to a non-privileged American National protected by the constitution

By ftsig-admin / June 5, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: That earnings under 26 U.S.C. 871 are privileged gross receipts instead of profit and don’t pertain to a non-privileged American National protected by the constitution

0. Introduction The position described on this page is exactly the position taken in the following 1040-NR form attachment: 1040-NR Attachment, Form #09.077https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/1040NR-Attachment.pdf Important notes: Below is a table summarizing the above: # Status name Describedin Priv-ileged? Foreign affairsprivilege? PersonElection PropertyElection 1 Political citizen* 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) N N N N 2 Civil citizen**+D at…

PROOF OF FACTS: The Social Security Number is Not NOW “The Mark of the Beast” but when its use becomes mandatory or universal, IT IS

By ftsig-admin / June 3, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: The Social Security Number is Not NOW “The Mark of the Beast” but when its use becomes mandatory or universal, IT IS

EDITORIAL: Perplexity.ai The U.S. Supreme Court has held in Bowen v. Roy, 476 U.S. 693 (1986) that the COMPELLED use of Social Security Numbers is only permissible among those seeking government “benefits”. Thus, if you want to AVOID the Mark of the Beast and the CURSE it brings in the First Bowl Judgement of the…

PROOF OF FACTS: Social Security Administration Definition of “U.S. citizen”

By ftsig-admin / May 15, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Social Security Administration Definition of “U.S. citizen”

Social Security Program Operations Manual System (POMS), GN 00303.120 Who Is a U.S. Citizen 7.  American Samoa and Swain’s Island An individual born in American Samoa or Swain’s Island is a U.S. National, unless U.S. citizenship was derived from a parent or acquired by marriage. For SSA purposes these individuals are considered to be U.S. citizens.…

PROOF OF FACTS: “United States” INCLUDES (not means) the government

By ftsig-admin / May 13, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “United States” INCLUDES (not means) the government

TABLE OF CONTENTS: For a debate relating to this article, see: DEBATE: About the meaning of “United States” in I.R.C. 864(b), FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/debate-about-the-meaning-of-united-states-in-i-r-c-864b/ 1. EXAMPLE 1: 26 U.S.C. 871(b) 26 U.S.C. §871(b) uses the term “United States” in the context of government instead of geography: 26 U.S. Code §871 – Tax on nonresident alien individuals (b)Income…

PROOF OF FACTS: Why it’s impossible and unreasonable to expect that you have the burden of proving a negative

By ftsig-admin / April 23, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why it’s impossible and unreasonable to expect that you have the burden of proving a negative

EDITORIAL: The tax system is engineered to make it difficult to avoid paying taxes by imposing the burden of proof upon the “Taxpayer” to prove a negative. Here are a few important examples where this tactic is used and there are many others. Attempts to claim that you are NOT something such as a “taxpayer”…

PROOF OF FACTS: “U.S source” does NOT include anything but payments DIRECTLY from the government and excludes even payments from “taxpayers”

By ftsig-admin / March 14, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “U.S source” does NOT include anything but payments DIRECTLY from the government and excludes even payments from “taxpayers”

1. Evidence and law: 1. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that Congress cannot authorize or license the VERY activity that is the subject of the current income tax. “Thus, Congress having power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes, may, without doubt, provide for granting…

PROOF OF FACTS: Why the government CAN’T AND WON’T RECOGNIZE PRIVATE OR FOREIGN and ONLY RECOGNIZES PUBLIC and DOMESTIC

By ftsig-admin / January 4, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why the government CAN’T AND WON’T RECOGNIZE PRIVATE OR FOREIGN and ONLY RECOGNIZES PUBLIC and DOMESTIC

The purpose of establishing government, according to the Declaration of Independence, is to protect PRIVATE property. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights,…