Proof of Facts

PROOF OF FACTS: That I.R.C. Subtitles A and C are NOT a CONSTITUTIONAL income tax but a CIVIL PRIVILEGE tax

By ftsig-admin / October 25, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: That I.R.C. Subtitles A and C are NOT a CONSTITUTIONAL income tax but a CIVIL PRIVILEGE tax

FACT: The tax described in Internal Revenue Code Subtitles A and C is NOT a “income tax” described in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 or the Sixteenth Amendment provisions of the Constitution. Instead, it is a tax upon legislatively created CIVIL privileges as PUBLIC property owned by Congress. PROOF: 1. The CIVIL STATUTORY tax…

PROOF OF FACTS: The I.R.C. Subtitle A Income tax is on FOREIGN/EXTERNAL Commerce under the Constitution, but DOMESTIC/Government Commerce for the purposes of INTERNAL taxation

By ftsig-admin / October 21, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: The I.R.C. Subtitle A Income tax is on FOREIGN/EXTERNAL Commerce under the Constitution, but DOMESTIC/Government Commerce for the purposes of INTERNAL taxation

PROOF: 1. The only place in STATUTES where “citizens” or “residents” are expressly identified as having a Subtitle A income tax obligation is in 26 U.S.C. §911, when they are abroad and not situated anywhere in the COUNTRY “United States*”. 1.1. 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) describe ONLY 26 U.S.C. §911 as “worldwide income”. it…

PROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(3) does NOT make all government or “U.S. source” income “gross income”

By ftsig-admin / September 3, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(3) does NOT make all government or “U.S. source” income “gross income”

Microsoft Copilot. QUESTION 1: For the purposes of I.R.C. 864(c)(3) does it mean the following? “26 U.S.C. §864(c)(3) is how they make PRIVATE earnings NOT “effectively connected” into privileged “gross income” if you enter it on the 1040NR mistakenly and thereby DONATE it to Uncle Sam. 26 U.S.C. §864(c)(3) does NOT mean all payments from…

PROOF OF FACTS: Exta-territorial jurisdiction of the national government

By ftsig-admin / August 23, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Exta-territorial jurisdiction of the national government

TABLE OF CONTENTS: EDITORIAL: This article provides authorities on the limits of extraterritorial jurisdiction of the national government. These authorities are useful in challenging jurisdiction in federal court and administratively. More on this subject at: 1. PROPOSITION: 2. PROOF: 2.1. All government law is prima facie territorial, meaning it is limited to the exclusive jurisdiction…

PROOF OF FACTS: “Deferred earnings” paid in connection with government retirement earned as a “U.S. person” are not “foreign income” or taxable under I.R.C. 864(c)

By ftsig-admin / August 9, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “Deferred earnings” paid in connection with government retirement earned as a “U.S. person” are not “foreign income” or taxable under I.R.C. 864(c)

1. Proof 26 U.S.C. Subtitle A, Chapter 1, Subchapter N, Part I is where 26 U.S.C. §864 is found and it refers to all earnings WITHIN or WITHOUT the United StatesG as “foreign income”. So EVERYTHING subject to the income tax must be “foreign income” based on the above. But WHICH type of “foreign” do…

PROOF OF FACTS: “Resident alien” is a LEGAL status not tied to the presence test

By ftsig-admin / July 26, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “Resident alien” is a LEGAL status not tied to the presence test

This article will prove that “resident alien” in the context of the Internal Revenue Code is a CIVIL and LEGAL status with a domicile INDEPENDENT of those who fill it. It is not tied exclusively to domicile of the person who VOLUNTEERS for the status. 1. The term “resident alien” is defined in 26 U.S.C.…

PROOF OF FACTS: Enforcing INVOLUNTARY “resident alien” status against those with a CIVILLY foreign domicile is criminal identity theft

By ftsig-admin / July 17, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Enforcing INVOLUNTARY “resident alien” status against those with a CIVILLY foreign domicile is criminal identity theft

EDITORIAL: More on this subject at: BEGIN PROOF 1. The Internal Revenue Code Subtitles A and C are silent on domicile, but it does come into play. Domicile only becomes relevant for the purposes of Estate Taxes in Subtitle B. 2. The presence test found in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) permits the national government to impute…

PROOF OF FACTS: Deceptive Definition of “Nonresident Alien” on the IRS Website

By ftsig-admin / July 10, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Deceptive Definition of “Nonresident Alien” on the IRS Website

The statutory DESCRIPTION of “nonresident alien” is as follows: 26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions (b)Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien (1)In general (B)Nonresident alien An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States (within the meaning of subparagraph (A)). The “United…

PROOF OF FACTS: How government and private industry hide or interfere with American Nationals being Nonresident Aliens

By ftsig-admin / June 25, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: How government and private industry hide or interfere with American Nationals being Nonresident Aliens

Trying to pursue the Nonresident Alien Position as an American National is like trying to look at and measure the size and mass of the black hole at the center of our Galaxy. Its strong gravity prevents it from emitting any light, radiation, sound, or matter you could use to measure it. The only way…

PROOF OF FACTS: Taxation of Intangibles is at the domicile of the owner by default

By ftsig-admin / June 16, 2025 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Taxation of Intangibles is at the domicile of the owner by default

EDITORIAL: While mobilia sequuntur personam remains a guiding principle, the Court has also recognized that intangibles may acquire a commercial situs in another jurisdiction, allowing taxation beyond the owner’s domicile The power of the State of a man’s domicil to impose a tax upon the succession to, or the transfer of, his intangible property, even…