Tools

Copilot: Authorities Proving that purely POLITICAL status cannot be used to impose or enforce CIVIL obligations absent consent

By ftsig-admin / April 9, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Authorities Proving that purely POLITICAL status cannot be used to impose or enforce CIVIL obligations absent consent

INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What book or authoritative source describes and proves why political status can’t be used to impose CIVIL obligations? ANSWER 1: Here’s the key thing: there is no single book that directly “proves” political status cannot be used to impose civil obligations, because U.S. courts do not frame…

PROOF OF FACTS: You were Never Lawfully Issued a “Social Security Number”

By ftsig-admin / April 8, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: You were Never Lawfully Issued a “Social Security Number”

0. Introduction Thesis: The Social Security Trap: Why You Were Never Assigned a Privileged “Resident” Number To the casual observer, a Social Security Number is just a nine-digit ID. However, a closer parsing of federal regulations reveals a profound distinction between the “individual” who allegedly works for “wages” and the “Brand Name” entity (franchise) owned…

Copilot: Mapping of Political Questions Doctrine to FTSIG Symbology and Terminology

By ftsig-admin / April 8, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Mapping of Political Questions Doctrine to FTSIG Symbology and Terminology

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with how courts collapse CIVIL and POLITICAL categories into one in order to unlawfully enlarge their jurisdiction and authority and destroy the separation of powers as documented in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf Montesquieu was the man who engineered the now famous three branch…

PROOF OF FACTS: Why CIVIL statutory “citizen” of the United States in 26 U.S.C. 1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary

By ftsig-admin / April 3, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Why CIVIL statutory “citizen” of the United States in 26 U.S.C. 1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary

INTRODUCTION: This series of facts prove that the “citizen” who is “of the United StatesF” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b) is voluntary for American nationals described in the Fourteenth Amendment. Once you get the terminology down as we have, the problem becomes much clearer. This is why they had to create the NRA and…

Copilot: Standing to Prosecute Involuntary Domestic Status Classification

By ftsig-admin / April 3, 2026 / Comments Off on Copilot: Standing to Prosecute Involuntary Domestic Status Classification

INTRODUCTION: Statutory “withholding agents” and “employers” are what is called “ministerial officers”. There are strict limits on what they are permitted to do by law. This series of questions describes how to challenge compelled domestic status capacity elections by ministerial officers in the context of withholding, reporting, and the processing of tax returns. Further information…

FAQ: Is a “citizen” in the Fourteenth Amendment Politically associated with the National Body Politic and automatically operating in a Domestic Statutory Capacity?

By ftsig-admin / March 31, 2026 / Comments Off on FAQ: Is a “citizen” in the Fourteenth Amendment Politically associated with the National Body Politic and automatically operating in a Domestic Statutory Capacity?

QUESTION: Are the following true? ANSWER: No.  Here’s why.  The IRC deploys terms and combinations of terms which create classes and subclasses throughout the IRC.  These terms appear to have the same meaning.  They do not. 1. A “citizen” as defined at 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) is associated with the national body politic (United StatesP) through…

FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: “nationals of the United States” are not within the definition of “nonresident alien” in I.R.C. 7701(b)(1)(B)

By ftsig-admin / March 30, 2026 / Comments Off on FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: “nationals of the United States” are not within the definition of “nonresident alien” in I.R.C. 7701(b)(1)(B)

Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4 QUESTION 1: You said: You completely contradict your earlier claims. Which is correct? PROOF OF FACTS: “nonresident alien” does NOT equal “nonresident” + “alien” by statutory construction rules, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-nonresident-alien-does-not-equal-nonresident-alien/ ANSWER 1: Let’s slow this down and get absolutely precise, because you’re right to call out the apparent contradiction — and the…

Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

By ftsig-admin / March 29, 2026 / Comments Off on Why Artificial Intelligence is of ZERO value in telling the truth about CORRUPT judicial doctrine

INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4, 3/29/26 The Bill of Rights IS the national common law: “It would be a very curious and unsatisfactory result, if, in construing a provision of constitutional law, always understood to have been adopted for protection and security to the rights of the individual as against the government, and which has…

HOW TO: Filing a Criminal Report against a Company for False Reporting/withholding and criminally Impersonating an “Employer” under I.R.C. 3406

By ftsig-admin / March 27, 2026 / Comments Off on HOW TO: Filing a Criminal Report against a Company for False Reporting/withholding and criminally Impersonating an “Employer” under I.R.C. 3406

1. Executive Summary: This article: Most of these false information returns are filed by companies that have no express authority to act as “employers” outside the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government on federal territory. One approach to stopping these reports is to file a criminal complaint, whether as a SUBSTITUTE for filing a return…

FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: There is such thing as a “citizen of the United StatesG” on this website

By ftsig-admin / March 3, 2026 / Comments Off on FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: There is such thing as a “citizen of the United StatesG” on this website

FALSE STATEMENT: There is such thing as a “citizen of the United StatesG” on the FTSIG website. REBUTTAL: United StatesG can’t ALWAYS be a geography for both BOTH residents AND citizens because: The only way around this dissonance that consistently works is to: Then it always works and is consistent with the idea of “domestic“,…