Tools
INTRODUCTION: This analysis looks at a case mentioned on the opening page of this site, in which the appeals court committed identity theft on the litigant. It applies the FTSIG identity laundering taxonomy to analyze the case. Below is how we described this case on the opening page: 3. Federal courts such as the Court…
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Based on the library of identity laundering primitives, can you: 1. List all the methods that destroy the separation of powers between states and the federal government. 2. Give examples in court doctrine of each. 3. Explain the examples. ANSWER 1: Below is a structured, comprehensive, doctrine‑anchored answer that identifies…
INTRODUCTION: The main target of this site is U.S. nationals living within the exclusive jurisdiction of the states of the Union. These people are nonresident aliens by default, which means the only thing taxable for them is found in 26 U.S.C. 871. We prove that only aliens are subject to 26 U.S.C. 871(a). PROOF OF…
INTRODUCTION: This inquiry formalizes into a standardized symbology system that documents the corrupt government tactics documented below and in the Holy Bible: How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardianhttps://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm Section 5 of the above describes the “biblical doctrine” that is the core of the modern corrupt administrative state. We have codified the…
QUESTION 1: What terminology is used in legal scholarship to describe what ftsig calls “capacity inversion”? ANSWER 1: Concise answer: In mainstream legal scholarship, the phenomenon that FTSIG calls capacity inversion is not labeled with that exact term, but it is recognized under several established doctrinal categories. The closest matches—conceptually and functionally—are: Each of these…
INTRODUCTION: If you want a definition of the actual “privilege” that the IRS refuses to acknowledge, see: QUESTION 1: The income tax you have said is indirect but NOT an excise. Where has the U.S. supreme court held that a tax can be indirect but NOT an excise or privilege tax? It never happened. ANSWER…
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Are there any additional connectors between PUB and PRI other than those in this section in the context of ftsig? Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.3: Lawful ways of connecting PUB/PRI , FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2.3._Lawful ANSWER 1: Short answer: No — within the FTSIG framework, there are only four PUB‑creating connectors,…
Copilot INTRODUCTION: This article is provided to show you a procedure you can use to determine exactly which “United States” applies in any given context. You can use this article with AI by: 1. Giving a link to the context you want to analyze. 2. Giving AI the link for this page 3. Asking Ai…
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: What is the definition of “personal services within the United States” ANSWER 1: Short answer: Under 26 U.S.C. § 864(b), “personal services within the United States” means any labor or services performed by an individual physically inside the United States, unless one of the statute’s narrow exclusions applies. What the statute…