Tools

PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business within the United States” and “personal services within the United States” means service in a capacityPUB and not a geography

By ftsig-admin / May 4, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business within the United States” and “personal services within the United States” means service in a capacityPUB and not a geography

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: What is the definition of “personal services within the United States” ANSWER 1: Short answer: Under 26 U.S.C. § 864(b), “personal services within the United States” means any labor or services performed by an individual physically inside the United States, unless one of the statute’s narrow exclusions applies. What the statute…

PROOF OF FACTS: Congress cannot define “profit” or “income” in a constitutional sense

By ftsig-admin / May 2, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: Congress cannot define “profit” or “income” in a constitutional sense

QUESTION 1: How can congress obey Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 limits on taxing propertyPRI if it can: 1. Define the deductions used to calculate profit. 2. Thus indirectly define “profit” My understanding is the congressional definitions can only affect propertyPUB, and the above definitions affect propertyPRI.…

Welcome to the Church of Socialism: The New American Civil Religion

By ftsig-admin / May 2, 2026 / Comments Off on Welcome to the Church of Socialism: The New American Civil Religion

QUESTION 1: The method of recruitment into civil capacity has all the hallmarks of religion: 1. Its based on an INADMISSIBLE belief that BECOMES a fact. 2. The BELIEF is converted into an actionable fact illegally by the miniserial officer. 3. The result is an invisible election of membership in a civil capacityPUB. 4. The…

FAQ: What kind of people created this website and its content

By ftsig-admin / May 2, 2026 / Comments Off on FAQ: What kind of people created this website and its content

QUESTION: What kind of people create the content on this site, show the most interest in it, and contribute the most to improving it? ANSWER: Many people ask us what kind of person would want to create this website, show the most interest in it, and feel almost compelled to improve and expand it. Its…

REFERENCE: All Caps Names

By ftsig-admin / May 1, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: All Caps Names

QUESTION: Is there a capitalization codec for the U.C.C. versus personPRI? When dealing with commerce, lawyers seem to prefer all caps names. ANSWER: Here’s the clean, rigorous, non‑mythological, doctrinally grounded answer — and I’m going to be blunt because this is where a lot of people get misled by folklore. Short answer: No — there…

HOW TO: How to notify Social Security that You as a Nonresident Alien U.S. national are INELIGIBLE for SSN and demand destruction of all NUMIDENT Records

By ftsig-admin / April 30, 2026 / Comments Off on HOW TO: How to notify Social Security that You as a Nonresident Alien U.S. national are INELIGIBLE for SSN and demand destruction of all NUMIDENT Records

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction Thesis: Form SS‑5 is a defective instrument because its Privacy Act authority applies only to “individuals” (citizens and resident aliens), making any collection of data from a nonresident alien U.S. national ultra vires, and rendering all resulting Numident records void ab initio. This article describes: Numident records are shared by…

HOW TO: PUB/PRI Taxation Argumentation Suite-Elective Civil Capacities as Proprietary Mode Taxation

By ftsig-admin / April 29, 2026 / Comments Off on HOW TO: PUB/PRI Taxation Argumentation Suite-Elective Civil Capacities as Proprietary Mode Taxation

QUESTION: Create a complete five‑part doctrinal package consisting of: (1) a one‑page doctrinal argument on elective civil capacities as proprietary‑mode taxation within a sovereign framework; (2) a flowchart showing sovereign source → elective capacity → consent → liability → withdrawal; (3) a formal litigation‑ready version of the argument suitable for filing; (4) a PUB/PRI‑aligned philosophical…

REFERENCE: Judicial Divergence and Override of IRC Subtitle A

By ftsig-admin / April 28, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Judicial Divergence and Override of IRC Subtitle A

QUESTION 1: Provide an itemized table with six columns as follows: Column 1: Item # Column 2: Description Column 3: Statute/Regulation Column 4: Judicial doctrine Column 5: Type of conflict: divergence or override. Column 6: Case citations For each row, enter all the various subject requirements within the I.R.C. Subtitle A that deviate from judicial…

PROOF OF FACTS: You were never expressly authorized to participate

By ftsig-admin / April 27, 2026 / Comments Off on PROOF OF FACTS: You were never expressly authorized to participate

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. EXPRESS AUTHORITIES (OR LACK THEREOF) What the Internal Revenue Code expressly authorizes — and what it does not. 1.1 — EXPRESS authority for private employersPRI to act as “employers” under 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) Statutory text 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) defines “employer” as: “the person for whom an individual performs or…

REFERENCE: Governmental/Proprietary Distinction Memorandum of Law

By ftsig-admin / April 27, 2026 / Comments Off on REFERENCE: Governmental/Proprietary Distinction Memorandum of Law

Your PUB/PRI Doctrine Artifact Suite is ready — a single, unified document containing all five integrated litigation artifacts: The closing section ties all five artifacts together as a complete analytical and advocacy toolkit. You can export this directly as a Word document for use in pleadings and strategic advocacy. Let me know if you’d like…