Tools
QUESTION: What’s the most misleading aspect of the geographical “United States” label in I.R.C. 7701(a)(9)? ANSWER: What’s so misleading, is they refer to the federal preemption label as the “geographical sense.” But if you think about it, there’s really no other way to do it. Here’s why: Asserting the meaning and purpose for United StatesG…
INTRODUCTION: In a Christian sense, foreign means separate and sanctified, which means “set apart for a purpose”. That purpose is God’s purpose, not man’s. Justification and Sanctification, Form #17.089https://sedm.org/Forms/17-Theology/JustificationVSanctification.pdf For more on this subject, see: QUESTION: Why does the Government associate PRIVATE with FOREIGN in the I.R.C. ANSWER: The answer to that question is covered…
INTRODUCTION: This article describes how to: More on this subject at: Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf QUESTION 1: You said that the dispute between the personPUB fiction and the human officer or personPRI mentioned in the Bill of Rights is one of the oldest disputes on the planet. Given that fact, there should certainly…
INTRODUCTION: More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: When did the term “private” transition from being defined as absolute ownership under common law principles to shared ownership through the personPUB usufruct under the civil statutory law? ANSWER 1: Great clarification — you’re asking specifically about the juridical shift in the meaning of “private”: from…
INTRODUCTION: This article shows how to ELIMINATE and DESTROY and EXPOSE court equivocation on ANY COURT CASE! This is probably the most useful article on our website to facilitate a clear and unequivocal understanding of any court case. For a catalog of all the various methods of legal deception, see: Sections 17.1 and 18.1 of…
SOURCE: Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights, SEDM; https://sedm.org/copilot-judicial-conspiracy-to-censor-or-interfere-with-common-law-private-foreign-rights/ INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions proves that: The above realities are now reflected on the following page of this site accessible from the Civil/Political Jurisdiction->Acquiring a “Civil Status” Menu item as follows: Acquiring a “Civil Status”, Section 4: The TWO…
QUESTION 1: You keep using the phrase “internal consistency” to describe our content. 1. Is there a metric for that for an entire website? 2. Where or how can I view that metric? ANSWER 1: Great questions — let’s break this down clearly. 1. Is there a metric for “internal consistency” across an entire website?…
INTRODUCTION: This article proves: QUESTION 1: Are the statuses in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) all political statuses, civil statuses, or both in the case of: 1. “national of the United States”. 2. “citizen of the United States” 3. “a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States”…
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction The theme of this website is that every attempt to assert civil statutory jurisdiction requires you to have a “domestic” status, meaning that you are part of the machinery of government, internal to government, and subject to direct statutory enactments of Congress without the need for implementing regulations as explained…