Tools
QUESTION: You state in the following that American Nationals residing within the protections of the Constitution have to make an election before they can have taxable income under I.R.C. 871: Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue CodeSection 7: Entering anything but PROFIT as “income” or “effectively connected” income on a tax…
State taxation in the case of political citizens* is based entirely on domicile per the U.S. Supreme Court: The obligation of one domiciled within a state to pay taxes there, arises from unilateral action of the state government in the exercise of the most plenary of sovereign powers, that to raise revenue to defray the…
QUESTION: What happens when you perfectly invoke the third rail issues documented on this site to lawfully avoid all income tax? ANSWER: We think the foreign tax status arguments documented on this website at this point is so perfected and complete, that the only way to stop the damn from breaking is to reject the…
Microsoft Copilot QUESTION: How then can one prove what the “citizen of the United States” is in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(b) with no legitimate definition. And without the ability to prove, isn’t there a violation of due process? Tax statutes CANNOT be arbitrary like this, unless of course. ANSWER: You’ve laid out a detailed legal argument…
EDITORIAL: This case dealt with the issue of whether “income” entered on a domestic privileged return and subject to privileged deductions under 26 U.S.C. §162 is CONSTITUTIONAL “income” under Eisner v. Macomber. The court essentially concluded that it isn’t, by stating that deductions are a matter of legislative grace. Anyone who can TAKE privileged “trade…
0. Introduction The position described on this page is exactly the position taken in the following 1040-NR form attachment: 1040-NR Attachment, Form #09.077https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/1040NR-Attachment.pdf Important notes: Below is a table summarizing the above: # Status name Describedin Priv-ileged? Foreign affairsprivilege? PersonElection PropertyElection 1 Political citizen* 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) N N N N 2 Civil citizen**+D at…
“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.” [Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn] QUESTION: Why is your content needlessly bombastic and inflammatory? This can scare away large parts of your potential audience. The purpose of this comment is to attack what I regard as possible weaknesses that could expose you or…
EDITORIAL: Perplexity.ai The U.S. Supreme Court has held in Bowen v. Roy, 476 U.S. 693 (1986) that the COMPELLED use of Social Security Numbers is only permissible among those seeking government “benefits”. Thus, if you want to AVOID the Mark of the Beast and the CURSE it brings in the First Bowl Judgement of the…
QUESTION: The language in 16A seems pretty broad. And there also seems to be multiple taxing methods in Title 26. Do you suppose that since the first two words of 16A is “The Congress,” that any and all taxes levied in Title 26 could be ARGUED to fall under 16A? If not, why not? For…
INTRODUCTION: This suggestion was eventually implemented. You can find it at: Writing Conventions on This Website, Section 2: Two Contexts for Legal Information, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2._Two QUESTION: What do you think about “individual^PRI” and “Individual^PUB” when the word is used, to distinguish between PRIVATE individuals and PUBLIC individuals, just like domestic^1 and domestic^2? You need to explain…