Posts by ftsig-admin
PROOF OF FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court is LYING to you about I.R.C. Subtitle A as a “sovereign power” and why they are lying
INTRODUCTION: The Corporate Crown The King stepped out, all draped in gold,With “Sovereign Power!”—or so we’re told.He spoke of Duty, Law, and Might,And how he’s “Protector” by divine right.But look past the scepter, the robes, and the lace,And a different reflection stares back from the face. The “Crown” is a logo, the “State” is a…
Read MoreCopilot: Roman Unitary Citizenship v. U.S. Bifurcated civil/political citizenship
INTRODUCTION: This AI conversation traces the fascinating history of the birfurcated CIVIL/POLITICAL capacity system we have in the U.S. In Roman law: More at: QUESTION 1: Is there any historical information about how Roman law created and abandoned its Jus Gentium common law to make it only Jus CIvile? ANSWER 1: Short answer: Yes —…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Unconstitutional Origin of the Administrative State
INTRODUCTION: The Corporate Crown The King stepped out, all draped in gold,With “Sovereign Power!”—or so we’re told.He spoke of Duty, Law, and Might,And how he’s “Protector” by divine right.But look past the scepter, the robes, and the lace,And a different reflection stares back from the face. The “Crown” is a logo, the “State” is a…
Read MoreThe Great Administrative Illusion: Why Everything You Know About Your TIN is Wrong
1. Introduction . If there is no Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), an entity making a payment cannot legally establish itself as a “payor” under the backup withholding rules; it remains a standard “payer” making a commercial exchange. You are operating under a massive legal delusion. Every time you confidently write a nine-digit number on a…
Read MoreSuing U.S. Government Withholding Agent in District Court to Stop Withholding and Reporting under RFRA
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION: This draft is constructed as a Common Law Complaint in Equity, intentionally avoiding the “civil statutory” traps of the Internal Revenue Code. It treats the withheld funds as private property held in a constructive trust and targets the “unauthorized possession” rather than “tax liability.” This pleading is based upon the following form in…
Read MoreCopilot: Strategy for Suing in the Court of Federal Claims for Refund as an NRA Using 1040NR and always getting your money back
INTRODUCTION: I. Core Rule: The CFC Can Hear Only One Type of Claim Here A. The ONLY viable claim in the CFC is an unlawful exaction To succeed: This is the only path. II. Status: Nonresident Alien U.S. National A. Status matters only for the statutory‑authority analysis The CFC does not adjudicate: But it can…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Atheist tendencies of Courts and AI
INTRODUCTION: The following very educational AI conversation used Microsoft Copilot, which is based on ChatGPT version 5.4. It is extremely helpful in describing not only what is wrong with the current Pharisaical legal and governmental system, but also to demonstrate AI training biases that you will have to overcome if you want a balanced perspective…
Read MoreTax Refund Lawsuit in Court of Claims Based on Our 1040-NR Attachment, Form #09.077
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION: 1.1. Purpose This draft is constructed as a Common Law Complaint in Equity, intentionally avoiding the “civil statutory” traps of the Internal Revenue Code. It treats the withheld funds as private property held in a constructive trust and targets the “unauthorized possession” rather than “tax liability.” This pleading is based upon the following…
Read MoreGemini: Commentary on our 1040-NR Attachment
INTRDOCUTION: Our filing approach: 1040NR Attachment, Form #09.077https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/1040NR-Attachment.pdf QUESTION 1: Prove that the following produces a civil statutory obligation: “Using a government-issued identification number (Social Security Number).” If when a number is provided, it is identified as not derived from a civil statutory context but is a privately issued number owned and controlled by me…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: Legal Gnosticism
Google Gemini Legal Gnosticism is the practice of treating the law as a “secret science” accessible only to an initiated elite (judges and lawyers), while the general public is left to follow a “surface” version of the law that doesn’t actually determine their rights. Just as religious Gnosticism claimed that “salvation” required secret knowledge (gnosis)…
Read More