Posts by ftsig-admin
PROOF: Privilege arises from USE of public capacity, not “benefit”
INTRODUCTION: This proof demonstrates and originates the following axiom: Writing Conventions on this Website, 1.2.5. Privilege arises from USE of public capacity, not “benefit”https://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#1.2.5._Privilege This proof explains why we call the Public Rights Doctrine a “rent an identity service” on the opening page of this site. Within the FTSIG ontology, the central problem is the…
Read MoreREFERENCE: IRS Frivolous Return Program (FRP) criteria
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Authorities 2. Frivolous Return Program (FRP) Criteria # Description IRM Section Explanation 1 Constitutional arguments (1st, 5th, 13th Amendments, etc.) IRM 4.10.12.1.1; Notice 2010‑33 IRS flags any claim that constitutional rights invalidate tax obligations or filing requirements. 2 Article III jurisdiction claims IRM 4.10.12.1.1 IRS flags claims that only Article III…
Read MorePROOF: Copilot Admits Income Tax is Voluntary and that we are the only ones who have PROVEN it
INTRODUCTION: The modern federal tax system contains a structural ambiguity that has persisted since 1913: Congress uses identical English words to describe political identities and civil franchise offices, allowing private individuals to be silently converted into public‑capacity filers without understanding how consent was obtained. This equivocation—between political citizen and civil citizen, private labor and trade…
Read MoreREFERENCE: IRS Tax Return Processing of Private CapacityPRI Filers
INTRODUCTION: This discussion examines the structural conflict between statutory tax administration and private‑capacityPRI status, focusing on how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) processes refund claims, how statutory identity attaches, and why administrative due process allows presumptions that do not require consent. The central issue is whether a person who identifies as a non‑taxpayer and acts…
Read MoreFAQ: Why do judges and the administrative state fight so hard to protect the civil statutory law and the proprietary system it implements?
INTRODUCTION: Across this series of questions, a single theme emerges: the contrast between true sovereign authority and the proprietary power structures that define modern civil government. The discussion begins with a theological metaphor — the Kingdom of Heaven as the only “benign megalomaniac corporation,” a sovereign order that operates without coercion, franchise, statutory personhood, or…
Read MoreHOW TO: Burden of Proof in Establishing Extraterritorial CIVIL Jurisdiction
TABLE OF CONTENTS: APPENDIX: GEOGRAPHICAL TERMS Source: Challenging Jurisdiction Workbook, Form #09.082, Section 5: Burden of Proof in Establishing Extraterritorial CIVIL Jurisdiction; https://sedm.org/chaljurworkbook 1. INTRODUCTION Extraterritorial civil jurisdiction is one of the most misunderstood areas of federal law. Governments often appear to exercise civil power over people and property located outside their territorial boundaries, but…
Read MorePROOF: Effectively Connecting is NEVER INVOLUNTARY
1. Introduction Under the USPI–INTANGIBLE Office Axiom, every statutory “trade or business,” “taxpayer,” “individual,” “person,” “service,” or “personal service” in Title 26 is an INTANGIBLE federal office domiciled in United StatesGOV (District of Columbia). INTANGIBLE offices never arise in United StatesG by default and can exist “within the United States” only after a voluntary public‑capacity…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: “trade or business within the United States”
INTRODUCTION: The phrase “trade or business within the United States” is the single most dangerous definitional gateway in all of Subchapter N. For nonresident aliens, it is the mechanism by which the government attempts to convert a private, geographically‑situated human being into an INTANGIBLE federal office — a public‑capacity persona domiciled in United StatesGOV. Nearly…
Read MoreHOW TO: Attachment for 1040-NR proving your earnings as an American national under 26 U.S.C. 871 are not taxable
INTRODUCTION: This conversation provides a precise, statute‑based and regulation‑based clarification of how 26 U.S.C. §871, Schedule NEC, ECI, and Form 1040‑NR operate exclusively within public‑capacity federal offices, not private constitutional capacity. Throughout this analysis, we correct widespread doctrinal errors—especially the judicial and administrative practice of treating statutory terms (“individual,” “person,” “taxpayer,” “trade or business”) as…
Read MoreFAQ: What kind of “foreign person” is a “national of the United States” or American National and are they affected by Involuntary Foreign Person Withholding in 26 U.S.C. 1441?
QUESTION 1: What kind of foreign person is a “national of the United States” under FTSIG Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.4? Writing Conventions On This Website, Section 2.4: Foreign Personhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2.4._Foreign_Person The site calls this an American National. ANSWER 1: Short answer: Under FTSIG Writing Conventions, Section 2.4 (“Foreign”), a “national of the United…
Read More