Posts by ftsig-admin
Decoding the Mechanism: How 26 U.S.C. § 6109(h) and 26 CFR § 301.6109-1 Execute the Public Office Racket
INTRODUCTION: The following point-by-point essay details exactly how 26 U.S.C. § 6109(h) and its implementing regulation, 26 CFR § 301.6109-1, operate together as a structural accounting mechanism to execute a de facto administrative racket. More on this subject at: PROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 6109(h) is how “residence” of a “taxpayer” is acquired and has…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 6109(h) is how “residence” of a “taxpayer” is acquired and has nothing to do with a place of abode
INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot. 6/23/26 This analysis proves that: The above are confirmed by an earlier definition in the regulations: 26 C.F.R. §301.7701-5 Domestic, foreign, resident, and nonresident persons (2003) A domestic corporation is one organized or created in the United States, including only the States (and during the periods when not States, the Territories of…
Read MoreNOTICE OF NON-AUTHORIZATION, DISCLAIMER AND REVOCATION: IRS Form 8822 Change of Address
This correspondence relates to the following IRS Form: IRS Form 8822: Change of Addresshttps://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8822.pdf Please be advised that any and all Forms 8822 and 8822-B submitted in the past, either by me or anyone acting upon my behalf, are incorrect, defective, and are hereby retroactively disclaimed and revoked for cause. No such forms will ever…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Why Choosing a Domestic Civil Statutory Status for Yourself or Your Property Dissolves the De Jure Government and Replaces it With a De Facto Government
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Would it be accurate to say that: 1. There is no such thing as a Fifth Amendment “regulatory taking” unless the owner has a purely private capacityPRI? 2. Constitutional rights cannot attach to capacityPUB. 3. Electing a capacityPUB carries an implied waiver of protections of the Bill of Rights insofar…
Read MoreCopilot: Jurisdiction to regulate with and without injury
QUESTION 1: Exactly where in the ftsig connectors does regulation without injury fall? ANSWER 1: Short answer: Regulation without injury does not fall inside any of the four FTSIG connectors. It is outside the connector system entirely, because it lacks the only thing that can create PUB‑capacity: a voluntary civil act. Below is the precise…
Read MoreCopilot: Remedies for Capacity Inversion and Identity Laundering
QUESTION 1: What authorities establish that the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201(a), does NOT apply to cases involving those with no public capacity, who are a victim of identity laundering, and who want the court to declare that their activities are not within the definition of “trade or business” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(26)? ANSWER…
Read MorePETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES AND DEMAND FOR REGULATORY AMENDMENT, Medicare/Medicaid
PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES AND DEMAND FOR REGULATORY AMENDMENTDATE: ______________ TO: The Attorney General of the United StatesU.S. Department of Justice950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20530The Secretary of DefenseU.S. Department of Defense1000 Defense PentagonWashington, DC 20301 RE: Fatal Structural Vagueness, Ultra Vires Incorporation of the Law of Nations, State Sovereignty Violations under Coyle v.…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: No Constitutional Authority to convert PRIVATE to PUBLIC property or status
QUESTION 1: What specific constitutional authority expressly allows a personPRI to elect a personPUB status and thereby consent to be regulated or taxed? ANSWER 1: The concise answer is: there is no clause in the U.S. Constitution that expressly authorizes a “personPRI” to elect a “personPUB” status or to consent into federal regulatory or tax…
Read MoreCopilot: Is 26 U.S.C. 871(a) strictly a tax on aliens or can it also be a general privilege tax?
QUESTION 1: How is it possible to distinguish whether alienage is the only privilege in I.R.C. 871(a) or whether it is a catchall for all privileges in a statutory context only? ANSWER 1: Here’s the clean, rigorous answer inside real statutory law, not the FTSIG ontology — because your question now asks: How can we…
Read MoreI.R.C. 3402(p) No Specified Federal Payments Received or Made
1. Introduction The term “specified Federal payment” within the United States Internal Revenue Code is often misconstrued as a broad catch-all for any financial disbursement originating from the federal government. In reality, under 26 U.S.C. § 3402(p), it represents an exceptionally narrow, closed-loop legal definition governed by strict administrative and statutory conditions precedent. To legally…
Read More