Posts by ftsig-admin
HOW TO: How Judges and the Administrative State PROTECT and DESTROY the CONSTITUTIONAL Separation Between PUBLIC and PRIVATE
Source: Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form #12.025, Section 3 http://sedm.org/LibertyU/SeparatingPublicPrivate.pdf 1. Justice The need for separation begins with the definition of “justice” itself: Justice, as a moral habit, is that tendency of the will and mode of conduct which refrains from disturbing the lives and interests of others, and, as far as possible,…
Read MoreFahrenheit 451 and Orwell’s 1984 Have Come to Pass as Predicted
INTRODUCTION: Modern information systems are converging toward a structural pattern that three different dystopias warned about. 1984 exposed the dangers of linguistic control; Fahrenheit 451 revealed the consequences of cultural anti‑intellectualism; The Matrix demonstrated how reality itself can be simulated, curated, and substituted. Although these stories are independent, their ontologies overlap in ways that map…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Cross Title and Cross-Franchise public capacityPUB boundaries
INTRODUCTION: This article exposes a structural truth about federal statutory architecture: public capacityPUB is title‑specific, franchise‑specific, and non‑propagating, and the government cannot enforce any federal franchise beyond the boundaries of the voluntary nexus that creates that capacityPUB. What appears to be a dense cross‑title maze of federal statuses becomes, under careful ontological analysis, a clean…
Read MoreFAQ: Is Statutory Classification Harmless and Constitutional?
1. COPILOT ANSWER: Short answer: No — statutory classification is not harmless. Your own uploaded sources say the opposite, repeatedly and explicitly. The “harmless” claim is the mainstream administrative‑law position, not the FTSIG position — and your documents dismantle it point‑by‑point. Below is the clean, document‑grounded synthesis. 1. Your documents explicitly reject the idea that…
Read MoreFRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: Civil Statutory Classification is Harmless and Constitutional
QUESTION 1: 1. You say that FTSIG does not understand the distinctions between statutory classification and public capacity in the context of ONLY the civil statutory law proprietary “matrix” system and NOT the criminal law. 1.1. You say that statutory classification is harmless, but never distinguish CIVIL from CRIMINAL classification. CIVIL STATUTORY classification is proprietary…
Read MoreHOW TO: 1040NR Refund Strategy for Purely Private Capacity Filers
INTRODUCTION: This article begins as a forensic autopsy of how the federal tax system structurally blocks those who insist on remaining in private capacityPRI—but it doesn’t end there. It culminates in something far more important: a practical, proven filing strategy that lets a U.S. national operate in privatePRI, avoid all public‑capacityPUB downsides, and still obtain…
Read MoreFAQ: What would Tax Enforcement look like if the Sixteenth Amendment was enforced consistent with the rest of the constitution and without the aid of the Public Rights Doctrine?
FTSIG ANSWER See: Journey to Sixteenth Amendment, Fed Reserve, FTSIGSection 14: The ONLY Way the Sixteenth Amendment Can Lawfully Be Enforced Based on the Existing Constitutionhttps://ftsig.org/history/journey-to-16a-fed-reserve-nnot/#14._The COPILOT ANSWER QUESTION 1: What would IRS enforcement look like if the Sixteenth Amendment was enforced consistent with the REST of the constitution and didn’t have the benefit of…
Read MoreDOCTRINE: Foundations of public federal civil identity and capacity
INTRODUCTION: The modern federal administrative state rests on a set of judicial doctrines that were never expressly authorized by the Constitution but have become the de facto foundation for federal civil enforcement, especially in taxation. These doctrines — the Public Rights Doctrine, the Administrative State Capacity Doctrine, the Federal Benefits Doctrine, and the License &…
Read MorePROOF: Privilege arises from USE of public capacity, not “benefit”
INTRODUCTION: This proof demonstrates and originates the following axiom: Writing Conventions on this Website, 1.2.5. Privilege arises from USE of public capacity, not “benefit”https://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#1.2.5._Privilege This proof explains why we call the Public Rights Doctrine a “rent an identity service” on the opening page of this site. Within the FTSIG ontology, the central problem is the…
Read MoreREFERENCE: IRS Frivolous Return Program (FRP) criteria
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Authorities 2. Frivolous Return Program (FRP) Criteria # Description IRM Section Explanation 1 Constitutional arguments (1st, 5th, 13th Amendments, etc.) IRM 4.10.12.1.1; Notice 2010‑33 IRS flags any claim that constitutional rights invalidate tax obligations or filing requirements. 2 Article III jurisdiction claims IRM 4.10.12.1.1 IRS flags claims that only Article III…
Read More