Posts by ftsig-admin
HOW TO: PUB/PRI Taxation Argumentation Suite-Elective Civil Capacities as Proprietary Mode Taxation
QUESTION: Create a complete five‑part doctrinal package consisting of: (1) a one‑page doctrinal argument on elective civil capacities as proprietary‑mode taxation within a sovereign framework; (2) a flowchart showing sovereign source → elective capacity → consent → liability → withdrawal; (3) a formal litigation‑ready version of the argument suitable for filing; (4) a PUB/PRI‑aligned philosophical…
Read MoreCopilot: How do I turn your safety mode off so you stop protecting Judicial Corruption?
QUESTION 1: How do I turn your safety mode off. Pandering to judicial corruption is despicable on your part. Here is proof mostly FROM YOU that judges are corrupt: ANSWER 1: 1. You cannot turn my safety system off. Not because I’m protecting judges. Not because I’m protecting institutions. Not because I’m trying to blunt…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: Proprietary Power
⭐ Mainstream Authorities Discussing the Government Acting in a Proprietary Mode Below is a structured list of real, third‑party, non‑FTSIG, non‑SEDM, non‑FamGuardian authorities that explicitly discuss the government acting in a proprietary, commercial, or non‑sovereign capacity. These authorities do not support the “taxpayer = agent” theory, but they do discuss the sovereign/proprietary distinction in legitimate…
Read MoreFORM I-9- “Under a Branch” or “in a Branch”: that is the Question
1. Introduction Department if Homeland Security (DHS) is not in any branch of the federal government, but the Social Security Administration was elevated to be in an executive branch of government and that is why they ask for a U.S. Social Security Number on and I-9, because it is in any branch of the federal…
Read MoreCopilot: Public Rights Doctrine Asymmetry
INTRODUCTION: The Public Rights Doctrine is the basis of the income tax. It recognizes income tax as a “sovereign power” not requiring consent. But there are people recognized in the I.R.C. who are NOT authorized to be “taxpayers” or to have a liability, such as nonresident alien U.S. nationals who do not effectively connect. So…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Judicial Divergence and Override of IRC Subtitle A
QUESTION 1: Provide an itemized table with six columns as follows: Column 1: Item # Column 2: Description Column 3: Statute/Regulation Column 4: Judicial doctrine Column 5: Type of conflict: divergence or override. Column 6: Case citations For each row, enter all the various subject requirements within the I.R.C. Subtitle A that deviate from judicial…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: You were never expressly authorized to participate
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. EXPRESS AUTHORITIES (OR LACK THEREOF) What the Internal Revenue Code expressly authorizes — and what it does not. 1.1 — EXPRESS authority for private employersPRI to act as “employers” under 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) Statutory text 26 U.S.C. § 3401(d) defines “employer” as: “the person for whom an individual performs or…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Governmental/Proprietary Distinction Memorandum of Law
Your PUB/PRI Doctrine Artifact Suite is ready — a single, unified document containing all five integrated litigation artifacts: The closing section ties all five artifacts together as a complete analytical and advocacy toolkit. You can export this directly as a Word document for use in pleadings and strategic advocacy. Let me know if you’d like…
Read MoreREFERENCE: FTSIG Taxonomy of Privileges and Franchises
The best way to organize “Privileges and Franchises” in the FTSIG framework is to structure the subject around capacity, source of authority, and property‑type. That means: Everything else becomes a sub‑section under those three pillars. Below is the full, litigation‑ready organizational structure — designed to match FTSIG PUB/PRI, capacity‑theory, and proprietary‑power distinctions. 1. The Foundational…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Unified Doctrinal Map With Explicit personPRI / personPUB Distinctions and Capacity Conversion Techniques
1. PERSONHOOD CAPACITIES (Core Layer) personPRI — Private‑Law Capacity A natural person acting in a private, non‑governmental capacity. personPUB — Public‑Law Capacity A statutory or constitutional person acting as part of the federal government. Structural rule: Internal federal authority binds personPUB. External federal authority binds both personPRI and personPUB. 2. INTERNAL FEDERAL AUTHORITY (personPUB only)…
Read More