REFERENCE: I.R.C. Subtitles A and C Statutory Capacities and Trigger Events

INTRODUCTION: This table was generated with Microsoft Copilot on 8/14/26. 1. Columns: 1. Column 1: #2. Column 2: Name3. Column 3: Statute4. Column 4: Classification:a. PUBb. PRIc. Classification only5. Trigger event6. Column 5: Explanation. 2. Rows ✅ Current Table State — 76 Statutory Capacities Section Rows Badge Foundational Definitions & Classifications (§7701) 1–7 🔘 Classification…

Read More

HOW TO: Strategy for avoiding frivolous return penalties under 6702 and getting the IRS to accept and process your return

INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: How would you suggest improving the following to make it more likely to be acceptable? 6. CHOICE OF LAW AND TERMS OF COMMERCIAL USE OF  MY PROPERTY AND IDENTIFYING INFORMATION: 1. This claim is brought under Article III and the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) and not the I.R.C, seeking recovery of…

Read More

PROOF: Income tax is a “rent an identity” service that turns “justice” into a privilege and INJUSTICE

INTRODUCTION: This series of Copilot questions proves with law and evidence that: More at: QUESTION 1: Because Proprietary Mode taxation exclusively under the Sixteenth Amendment depends on a personPUB to attach private propertyPRI to so it can be taxed, then: 1. Doesn’t the I.R.C. Subtitles A and C income tax function essentially as a “rent…

Read More

HOW TO: Forcing Administrative State to expose presumption of PUBLIC capacityPUB and consideration provided to operate in that capacity

1. INTRODUCTION: These tactics are useful in administrative correspondence to force the agency into the legal equivalent of a “perpetual identity hearing” where they must expose all their secret presumptions and equivocation. In the process, they literally commit enforcement suicide by being compelled to expose WITH EVIDENCE that they have no enforcement authority at all,…

Read More

REFERENCE: Biblical Perspective on Sovereign v. Proprietary Mode

INTRODUCTION: I. The Foundational Insight: The PRI → PUB Ontology The conversation established a structural ontology that explains the rise and fall of civilizations: Private Capacity (PRI) Public Capacity (PUB) This ontology is the backbone of the entire discussion. The central insight: Civilizations repeatedly convert sovereign power (PRI) into proprietary power (PUB) through legal mechanisms…

Read More

PROOF: Civil Statutory Privileges are ALWAYS voluntary for U.S. nationals and involuntary for aliens, regardless of geography

INTRODUCTION: I. Overview and Central Thesis The article presents a comprehensive argument within the FTSIG ontology that civil statutory privileges—benefits, elections, and statuses created by federal civil statutes—operate under two fundamentally different jurisdictional regimes: The article asserts that these distinctions are absolute, universal, and independent of geography. Whether a person stands in Texas or Tokyo,…

Read More

DOCTRINE: Court practices for establishing or exercising agency or capacity

INTRODUCTION: The document lays out a comprehensive doctrinal framework for how courts determine agency, capacity, and whether a signer acts as a public personPUB or private personPRI when signing documents. It answers multiple questions with authorities, matrices, flowcharts, and litigation‑ready arguments. 1. Core Question The page asks what laws, rules, doctrines, maxims, and processes courts…

Read More