Posts by ftsig-admin
Copilot: Tax Computation Process for Nonresident Aliens
QUESTION 1: Is this the proper method of computing taxable income for a nonresident alien? 1. I.R.C. 61 is gross income. 2. I.R.C. 861/862 breaks that 61 gross income into within and without the U.S. 3. I.R.C. 862 is peeled off because not a U.S. source. I.R.C. 872 (exclusions) IMPLEMENTS the filtering of 862. 4.…
Read MoreCopilot: IRS Deception About who are “nonresident aliens”
QUESTION 1: IRS Publication 519 identifies itself as “U.S. tax guide for aliens”. However, it addresses nonresident aliens who are “U.S. nationals”. A U.S. national under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) is not an alien. And the word “alien” is defined in 26 C.F.R. 1.1441-1(c)(3)(i) as someone who is NEITHER a citizen nor a national. Does that…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: How government and private industry hide or interfere with American Nationals being Nonresident Aliens
Trying to pursue the Nonresident Alien Position as an American National is like trying to look at and measure the size and mass of the black hole at the center of our Galaxy. Its strong gravity prevents it from emitting any light, radiation, sound, or matter you could use to measure it. The only way…
Read MoreCopilot: Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine applied to Federal and State Income Taxation
EDITORIAL: The application of the UCD has never been addressed or settled in the context of taxation. Only in other contexts. But like gross receipts limitations, it too applies to constitutional taxation when applied to those with constitutional rights standing on land the constitution applies. It appears to be such a hot button issue that…
Read MoreCopilot: Is the income tax a DIRECT tax or an INDIRECT tax?
QUESTION 1: Does an election surrender the protections of the constitution under the Public Rights Doctrine and the Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine in the context of the civil statutory status that results from the election? For instance, if I elect “effectively connected” status in 26 U.S.C. 864, do I surrender the protection of the constitutional definition…
Read MoreCopilot: How does an “national of the United States” under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) become a “foreign person”?
EDITORIAL: The more absurd this all gets with equivocation and conflation, the more obvious it should be to the casual observer that they are hiding the truth. The casual observer is a “deer in the headlights” They don’t stand a chance. You need a phd in deception to catch these bastards! They probably have a…
Read MoreCopilot: FDAP under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)(1) is a tax on gross receipts and not profit. Does that mean it doesn’t apply to people residing within states of the Union and protected by the Constitution?
EDITORIAL: To summarize the approach to nonresident alien taxation on this website: It seems that the latitude Congress is given in Sixteenth Amendment varies depending on activity or recipient. It could be from: Social Security under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)(3) fits in EITHER 3 or 4 above, depending on where you are from. For a nonresident…
Read MoreCopilot: “nonresident alien” fiction is domiciled in the District of Columbia and “U.S. sources” means District of Columbia Sources
EDITORIAL: This article establishes why domicile is ALWAYS important. Even in federal taxation, even though domicile is never even mentioned in I.R.C. Subtitles A and C. Domicile can NEVER be ignored or it will cloud or equivocate the origin of the jurisdiction of the taxing authority. ALL civil jurisdiction originates from it, and taxing authority…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: Taxation of Intangibles is at the domicile of the owner by default
EDITORIAL: While mobilia sequuntur personam remains a guiding principle, the Court has also recognized that intangibles may acquire a commercial situs in another jurisdiction, allowing taxation beyond the owner’s domicile The power of the State of a man’s domicil to impose a tax upon the succession to, or the transfer of, his intangible property, even…
Read MoreFAQ: What specific provision and status in the I.R.C. actually implements CONSTITUTIONAL/Sixteenth Amendment “income” as PROFIT instead of GROSS RECEIPTS?
QUESTION: You allege in the following article that CONSTITUTIONAL/Sixteenth Amendment “income” is always on profit and not “gross receipts”. Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue Code, Section 8: Entering anything but PROFIT as “income” or “effectively connected” income on a tax return, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/#7._Entering Precisely what status within the I.R.C. and what…
Read More