Subject matter jurisdiction DOES NOT EXIST under the 16th Amendment!

In addition to the above, the U.S. Supreme Court has held in Stanton v. Baltic Mining, 240 U.S. 103 (1916) that the Sixteenth Amendment “conferred no new taxing powers”. This fellow missed some MAJOR points that render his commentary IRRELEVANT to the average American: 1. All the Sixteenth Amendment really did was remove the apportionment…

Read More

Exactly Who can withhold on an NRA and how exactly to deal with it?

1. The BIG picture The U.S. person election in this article operates INDEPENDENT of the W-4 “wage” election. That is a completely different subject. In most cases, “nonresident aliens” receiving W-2’s are permitted to exclude their earnings by regulation from taxation, and also are not required to “effectively connect” those earnings by entering them on…

Read More

Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass, 358 U.S. 426 (1955)

Case Link: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11404527107386030954 Wikipedia Article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioner_v._Glenshaw_Glass_Co. IMPORTANCE: This case is famous because it redefined “gross income” for the purposes of I.R.C. 61 to mean “all accessions of wealth over which the taxpayer has complete dominion”. Prior to this case, Stratton’s Independence v. Howbert, 231 U.S. 399, 415, 34 S.Sup.Ct. 136, 140 58 L.Ed. 285, Doyle v.…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: There is no legitimate definition of “citizen of the United States” in the Internal Revenue Code so there is no way other than an election to become one

Microsoft Copilot QUESTION: How then can one prove what the “citizen of the United States” is in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(b) with no legitimate definition. And without the ability to prove, isn’t there a violation of due process? Tax statutes CANNOT be arbitrary like this, unless of course. ANSWER: You’ve laid out a detailed legal argument…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Constitutional “income” limitations do not apply to DOMESTIC PROPERTY or ENTITIES so tax is on GROSS RECEIPTS instead of PROFIT

EDITORIAL: This case dealt with the issue of whether “income” entered on a domestic privileged return and subject to privileged deductions under 26 U.S.C. §162 is CONSTITUTIONAL “income” under Eisner v. Macomber. The court essentially concluded that it isn’t, by stating that deductions are a matter of legislative grace. Anyone who can TAKE privileged “trade…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: That earnings under 26 U.S.C. 871 are privileged gross receipts instead of profit and don’t pertain to a non-privileged American National protected by the constitution

0. Introduction The position described on this page is exactly the position taken in the following 1040-NR form attachment: 1040-NR Attachment, Form #09.077https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/1040NR-Attachment.pdf Important notes: Below is a table summarizing the above: # Status name Describedin Priv-ileged? Foreign affairsprivilege? PersonElection PropertyElection 1 Political citizen* 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) N N N N 2 Civil citizen**+D at…

Read More

The Fair Tax Act

EDITORIAL: There’s NO SUCH THING as a “fair tax”. A tax is just a fee for government services. If you don’t want any government services or property, justice itself DEMANDS that they LEAVE YOU ALONE! BEGIN ARTICLE: H. R. 25— 119th Congress (2025-2026) https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/25/text#HB8BE7907D34844AF9A7B0EE39F519631 119th CONGRESS1st Session H. R. 25 To promote freedom, fairness, and…

Read More