Posts by ftsig-admin
FAQ: Why is your content needlessly bombastic and inflammatory? This can scare away large parts of your potential audience
“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.” [Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn] QUESTION: Why is your content needlessly bombastic and inflammatory? This can scare away large parts of your potential audience. The purpose of this comment is to attack what I regard as possible weaknesses that could expose you or…
Read MoreFormer IRS Agent Alleges Income Tax Misapplied To Americans and Admits that SHE is reading this site and using its methods!
The above video of Sherry Jackson, Ex IRS agent, was filmed at the annual Anarchapulco Festival in February 2020. Jeff Berwick hosts the event and Sherry was there. She talks about taxes on your labor being slavery. She is absolutely right. We prove this in: Proof that Involuntary Income Taxes on Your Labor are Slavery,…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: The Social Security Number is Not NOW “The Mark of the Beast” but when its use becomes mandatory or universal, IT IS
EDITORIAL: Perplexity.ai The U.S. Supreme Court has held in Bowen v. Roy, 476 U.S. 693 (1986) that the COMPELLED use of Social Security Numbers is only permissible among those seeking government “benefits”. Thus, if you want to AVOID the Mark of the Beast and the CURSE it brings in the First Bowl Judgement of the…
Read MorePERPLEXITY AI: Can a nonresident party outside of exclusive federal jurisdiction be a “person” under federal law, or do they have to be sued under STATE law instead?
EDITORIAL: This interchange PROVES that a nonresident alien can be NEITHER a “person” under 26 U.S.C. 6671(b) or 26 U.S.C. 7343. They are BOTH CIVIL and not CRIMINAL in nature. Thus, they are PENAL rather than CRIMINAL. REMEMBER: When querying AI: This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure…
Read MoreDEBATE: Confusion created by Citizen* and Citizen**+D nomenclature
EDITORIAL: This debate is very helpful to our readers for discerning the bright red line separating PUBLIC and PRIVATE in the context of citizenship terminology and their relationship to franchises. We HIGHLY recommend reading it. This fits nicely and coherently into the following presentation on the same subject: Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form…
Read MoreCopilot: Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924) Implications
EDITORIAL: The “identity theft” and “human trafficking” described in our answers here can be reported to the IRS on the following SEDM form: Identity Theft Affidavit, Form #14.020https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/Identity_Theft_Affidavit-f14039.pdf The AI chatbot in this interchange basically SANCTIONS the filing of this form if the IRS unilaterally changes your status from “nonresident alien” to “U.S. person” without…
Read MoreFAQ: Since the Sixteenth Amendment begins with “The Congress”, does that mean that all taxes levied in Title 26 originate from the Sixteenth Amendment?
QUESTION: The language in 16A seems pretty broad. And there also seems to be multiple taxing methods in Title 26. Do you suppose that since the first two words of 16A is “The Congress,” that any and all taxes levied in Title 26 could be ARGUED to fall under 16A? If not, why not? For…
Read MoreFAQ: Why Not create an individualPRI and individualPUB to distinguish the PUBLIC straw man from the PRIVATE human?
INTRODUCTION: This suggestion was eventually implemented. You can find it at: Writing Conventions on This Website, Section 2: Two Contexts for Legal Information, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2._Two QUESTION: What do you think about “individual^PRI” and “Individual^PUB” when the word is used, to distinguish between PRIVATE individuals and PUBLIC individuals, just like domestic^1 and domestic^2? You need to explain…
Read MoreGovernment employee admits that American Nationals who are POLITICAL citizens and even FOREIGN nationals can be “nonresident aliens” at birth anywhere in the COUNTRY!
EDITORIAL Notice they refer to ALIENS born within the United States of America as “nonresident aliens”! And what makes them “NONRESIDENT aliens” is that they DID NOT declare “permanent resident status” and thus CONSENT to be “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States”! This is a TELLING admission that you can be inside the…
Read MoreDEBATE: About the meaning of “United States” in I.R.C. 864(b)
QUESTION: I believe your conclusions in this article are errant. PROOF OF FACTS: “United States” INCLUDES (not means) the government, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-united-states-includes-the-government/#2._EXAMPLE United States is geographical—not governmental. The ultimate source of taxing authority is the government—that is correct. But they are hiding the government meaning by shielding it with the geographical sense. Proof of this can…
Read More