Posts by ftsig-admin
FAQ: What specific provision and status in the I.R.C. actually implements CONSTITUTIONAL/Sixteenth Amendment “income” as PROFIT instead of GROSS RECEIPTS?
QUESTION: You allege in the following article that CONSTITUTIONAL/Sixteenth Amendment “income” is always on profit and not “gross receipts”. Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue Code, Section 8: Entering anything but PROFIT as “income” or “effectively connected” income on a tax return, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/#7._Entering Precisely what status within the I.R.C. and what…
Read MoreFAQ: You state that American Nationals residing within the protections of the Constitution have to make an election before they can have taxable income under I.R.C. 871. What if they receive “income” from those who are privileged?
QUESTION: You state in the following that American Nationals residing within the protections of the Constitution have to make an election before they can have taxable income under I.R.C. 871: Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue CodeSection 7: Entering anything but PROFIT as “income” or “effectively connected” income on a tax…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: “Privilege”
Fourteenth Amendment Annotations: “Privileges and Immunities Clause” Commentary-Findlaw Confucius“The more you want, the more the world can hurt you.” Center for Special Needs Trust Administration v. Olson, No. 1:09-cv-072, at *16 (D.N.D. Apr. 25, 2011) “A person may waive the rights and privileges to which that person is legally entitled, whether secured by contract, conferred…
Read MoreCopilot: American nationals are not “foreign persons” for the purpose of I.R.C. Chapter 3 “foreign person” withholding in 26 U.S.C. 1441 and 26 C.F.R. 1.1441-1
EDITORIAL COMMENT: This dialog contains equivocation surrounding whether “U.S. national” is a nonresident alien so it fails the “law of noncontradiction” so it can’t be entirely true. See in Question 7: But crucially, “nonresident alien” is defined by reference to 26 U.S.C. § 7701(b)(1)(B), which—when read in light of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(3)—excludes U.S. nationals, because they are not aliens.…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: “Civil status”
Acquiring a Civil Status (Important!) -FTSIG Civil Status (Important!) (OFFSITE LINK)-SEDM Your Exclusive Right to Declare and Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008 (OFFSITE LINK)-SEDM Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #05.002 (OFFSITE LINK)-civil domicile is the origin of civil status Capitis Diminutio CAPITIS DIMINUTIO. In Roman law. A dimin ishing or abridgment of personality;…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: That the I.R.C. Subtitle A Income Tax is Based on USPI and implemented with a mandatory DOMICILE resulting from your voluntary election of CIVIL “citizen**+D of the United States”
State taxation in the case of political citizens* is based entirely on domicile per the U.S. Supreme Court: The obligation of one domiciled within a state to pay taxes there, arises from unilateral action of the state government in the exercise of the most plenary of sovereign powers, that to raise revenue to defray the…
Read MoreU.S. v. Goelet, 232 U.S. 293 (1914) and U.S. v. Bennett, 232 U.S. 299 (1914)
CASE LINKS: SIGNIFICANCE: These two cases present the question of whether the constitutional power of excise taxation over property located outside United States the country applies in two scenarios: The court decided that the domiciled taxpayer was liable and the taxpayer with the foreign domicile was not liable. The circumstances of the Goelet case most…
Read MoreFAQ: What happens when you perfectly invoke the third rail issues documented on this site to lawfully avoid all income tax?
QUESTION: What happens when you perfectly invoke the third rail issues documented on this site to lawfully avoid all income tax? ANSWER: We think the foreign tax status arguments documented on this website at this point is so perfected and complete, that the only way to stop the damn from breaking is to reject the…
Read MoreSubject matter jurisdiction DOES NOT EXIST under the 16th Amendment!
In addition to the above, the U.S. Supreme Court has held in Stanton v. Baltic Mining, 240 U.S. 103 (1916) that the Sixteenth Amendment “conferred no new taxing powers”. This fellow missed some MAJOR points that render his commentary IRRELEVANT to the average American: 1. All the Sixteenth Amendment really did was remove the apportionment…
Read More