PROOF OF FACTS: That earnings under 26 U.S.C. 871 are privileged gross receipts instead of profit and don’t pertain to a non-privileged American National protected by the constitution

0. Introduction The position described on this page is exactly the position taken in the following 1040-NR form attachment: 1040-NR Attachment, Form #09.077https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/1040NR-Attachment.pdf Important notes: Below is a table summarizing the above: # Status name Describedin Priv-ileged? Foreign affairsprivilege? PersonElection PropertyElection 1 Political citizen* 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) N N N N 2 Civil citizen**+D at…

Read More

The Fair Tax Act

EDITORIAL: There’s NO SUCH THING as a “fair tax”. A tax is just a fee for government services. If you don’t want any government services or property, justice itself DEMANDS that they LEAVE YOU ALONE! BEGIN ARTICLE: H. R. 25— 119th Congress (2025-2026) https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/25/text#HB8BE7907D34844AF9A7B0EE39F519631 119th CONGRESS1st Session H. R. 25 To promote freedom, fairness, and…

Read More

FAQ: Why is your content needlessly bombastic and inflammatory? This can scare away large parts of your potential audience

“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.” [Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn] QUESTION: Why is your content needlessly bombastic and inflammatory? This can scare away large parts of your potential audience. The purpose of this comment is to attack what I regard as possible weaknesses that could expose you or…

Read More

PERPLEXITY AI: Can a nonresident party outside of exclusive federal jurisdiction be a “person” under federal law, or do they have to be sued under STATE law instead?

EDITORIAL: This interchange PROVES that a nonresident alien can be NEITHER a “person” under 26 U.S.C. 6671(b) or 26 U.S.C. 7343. They are BOTH CIVIL and not CRIMINAL in nature. Thus, they are PENAL rather than CRIMINAL. REMEMBER: When querying AI: This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure…

Read More

DEBATE: Confusion created by Citizen* and Citizen**+D nomenclature

EDITORIAL: This debate is very helpful to our readers for discerning the bright red line separating PUBLIC and PRIVATE in the context of citizenship terminology and their relationship to franchises. We HIGHLY recommend reading it. This fits nicely and coherently into the following presentation on the same subject: Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form…

Read More

Copilot: Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924) Implications

EDITORIAL: The “identity theft” and “human trafficking” described in our answers here can be reported to the IRS on the following SEDM form: Identity Theft Affidavit, Form #14.020https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/Identity_Theft_Affidavit-f14039.pdf The AI chatbot in this interchange basically SANCTIONS the filing of this form if the IRS unilaterally changes your status from “nonresident alien” to “U.S. person” without…

Read More

FAQ: Why Not create an individualPRI and individualPUB to distinguish the PUBLIC straw man from the PRIVATE human?

INTRODUCTION: This suggestion was eventually implemented. You can find it at: Writing Conventions on This Website, Section 2: Two Contexts for Legal Information, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2._Two QUESTION: What do you think about “individual^PRI” and “Individual^PUB” when the word is used, to distinguish between PRIVATE individuals and PUBLIC individuals, just like domestic^1 and domestic^2? You need to explain…

Read More