Posts by ftsig-admin
Copilot: Meaning of civil statutory “services”
EDITORIAL: This series of questions demonstrates and explains the following facts: Once you volunteer to engage in “services” as a civil “person” officer of the national government within the U.S. Inc. Federal Corporation in a “DOMESTIC” (26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) status, you can no longer complain that you are a slave like some people mistakenly try…
Read MoreWhy Some People Need Us
EDITORIAL: Most people get sucked into the “U.S. person” government matrix because of what some people call “stinkin thinkin”. Psychology diagnoses this kind of thinking as the Dunning-Kruger Effect. This message is directed at those kinds of people, which is most people and was us at one time, to give them a perspective on why…
Read MoreCopilot: Defeating the Public Interest Doctrine in Munn v. Illinois
QUESTION 1: What does it mean to be “affected with a public interest” in Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113: “This brings us to inquire as to the principles upon which this power of regulation rests, in order that we may determine what is within and what without its operative effect. Looking, 126*126 then, to…
Read MoreCopilot: Can an obligation attached to a civil person in the future continue if the domicile or civil status that is the basis of it is extinguished before the date it triggers?
EDITORIAL: This series of questions surrounds whether past actions by American nationals who incorrectly made a “U.S. person” election by filing a 1040 form while working for the government and accumulating pension credits can under 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(6) be used to COMPEL that same American national filing as a nonresident alien and protected by the…
Read MoreCopilot: Can you lawfully consent to enlarge governmental powers?
EDITORIAL: On the subject of consent in the context of taxation, the U.S. Supreme Court said: “The constitutional right [Form #10.015] against unjust taxation [of PRIVATE, constitutionally protect property] is given for the protection of private property [Form #12.046], but it may be waived by those affected who consent [Form #05.003] to such action to…
Read MoreCopilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions proves that: The article also shows you how to litigate the above in a court of law and describe it to the jury. More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: There is no question that the national government has subject matter over its own property throughout the states of…
Read MoreDEBATE: Is everything paid by the government “effectively connected” without your consent?
EDITORIAL: More on this subject at: FALSE STATEMENT: 26 U.S.C. §864(c)(2) says in part: In determining whether income from sources within the United States . . . is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States, the factors taken into account shall include whether— (emphasis added) Now I will…
Read MoreCopilot: Are the criminal provisions of the I.R.C. actually penal provisions tied to voluntary franchise provisions?
QUESTION 1: What legal criteria would a judge use to distinguish a criminal statute and the penal provisions of a franchise contract? Title 18 lists all the federal crimes but the I.R.C. has its own penal violations that seem to limit themselves to officers or employees of federal corporations in 26 U.S.C. 7343. ANSWER 1:…
Read MoreCopilot: Are the government’s franchises lawfully executed under the U.C.C.?
EDITORIAL: This exchange establishes that: The “enfranchisement” happens between the 3rd party “recruiters” and their employees or contractors – via presumed “voluntary” consent to the terms established by Forms such as the W-4, W-9, etc., which allegedly identify the “qualified” franchisees (albeit in a rather confusing manner). Said forms are the chum made available to…
Read MorePROOF: Exta-territorial jurisdiction of the national government
TABLE OF CONTENTS: EDITORIAL: This article provides authorities on the limits of extraterritorial jurisdiction of the national government. These authorities are useful in challenging jurisdiction in federal court and administratively. More on this subject at: 1. PROPOSITION: 2. PROOF: 2.1. All government law is prima facie territorial, meaning it is limited to the exclusive jurisdiction…
Read More