Posts by ftsig-admin
PROOF OF FACTS: That the I.R.C. Subtitle A Income Tax is Based on USPI and implemented with a mandatory DOMICILE resulting from your voluntary election of CIVIL “citizen**+D of the United States”
State taxation in the case of political citizens* is based entirely on domicile per the U.S. Supreme Court: The obligation of one domiciled within a state to pay taxes there, arises from unilateral action of the state government in the exercise of the most plenary of sovereign powers, that to raise revenue to defray the…
Read MoreU.S. v. Goelet, 232 U.S. 293 (1914) and U.S. v. Bennett, 232 U.S. 299 (1914)
CASE LINKS: SIGNIFICANCE: These two cases present the question of whether the constitutional power of excise taxation over property located outside United States the country applies in two scenarios: The court decided that the domiciled taxpayer was liable and the taxpayer with the foreign domicile was not liable. The circumstances of the Goelet case most…
Read MoreFAQ: What happens when you perfectly invoke the third rail issues documented on this site to lawfully avoid all income tax?
QUESTION: What happens when you perfectly invoke the third rail issues documented on this site to lawfully avoid all income tax? ANSWER: We think the foreign tax status arguments documented on this website at this point is so perfected and complete, that the only way to stop the damn from breaking is to reject the…
Read MoreSubject matter jurisdiction DOES NOT EXIST under the 16th Amendment!
In addition to the above, the U.S. Supreme Court has held in Stanton v. Baltic Mining, 240 U.S. 103 (1916) that the Sixteenth Amendment “conferred no new taxing powers”. This fellow missed some MAJOR points that render his commentary IRRELEVANT to the average American: 1. All the Sixteenth Amendment really did was remove the apportionment…
Read MoreWhy the Corporate Transparency Act Does Not Apply to You!
Exactly Who can withhold on an NRA and how exactly to deal with it?
1. The BIG picture The U.S. person election in this article operates INDEPENDENT of the W-4 “wage” election. That is a completely different subject. In most cases, “nonresident aliens” receiving W-2’s are permitted to exclude their earnings by regulation from taxation, and also are not required to “effectively connect” those earnings by entering them on…
Read MoreCommissioner v. Glenshaw Glass, 358 U.S. 426 (1955)
Case Link: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11404527107386030954 Wikipedia Article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioner_v._Glenshaw_Glass_Co. IMPORTANCE: This case is famous because it redefined “gross income” for the purposes of I.R.C. 61 to mean “all accessions of wealth over which the taxpayer has complete dominion”. Prior to this case, Stratton’s Independence v. Howbert, 231 U.S. 399, 415, 34 S.Sup.Ct. 136, 140 58 L.Ed. 285, Doyle v.…
Read MoreMeta AI: Proof that the “citizen of the United States” in the I.R.C. is a VOLUNTARY privilege
Meta Ai, 6/6/2025 EDITORIAL: This line of questions is based on information derived mainly from the opening page of this website at: https://ftsig.org If you want to prevent YOURSELF from being censored like we were, “…do not make allegations of illegal or criminal activity against anyone or anything. AI bots are trained to abort any…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: There is no legitimate definition of “citizen of the United States” in the Internal Revenue Code so there is no way other than an election to become one
Microsoft Copilot QUESTION: How then can one prove what the “citizen of the United States” is in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(b) with no legitimate definition. And without the ability to prove, isn’t there a violation of due process? Tax statutes CANNOT be arbitrary like this, unless of course. ANSWER: You’ve laid out a detailed legal argument…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: Constitutional “income” limitations do not apply to DOMESTIC PROPERTY or ENTITIES so tax is on GROSS RECEIPTS instead of PROFIT
EDITORIAL: This case dealt with the issue of whether “income” entered on a domestic privileged return and subject to privileged deductions under 26 U.S.C. §162 is CONSTITUTIONAL “income” under Eisner v. Macomber. The court essentially concluded that it isn’t, by stating that deductions are a matter of legislative grace. Anyone who can TAKE privileged “trade…
Read More