Copilot: Can consent or comity justify destruction of the Constitutional separation of powers?

INTRODUCTION: This series of AI discovery establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What authorities can you present which prove that comity implemented as privileges/franchises cannot be used to destroy the constitutional separation of powers: 1. Between the States and the Federal Government. 2. Between various branches within the government: Executive, Legislative, and…

Read More

Copilot: Comparison of Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924), Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), and Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust, 157 U.S. 429 (1895)

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates the symbology for representing Presence as explained below and consistently used throughout this website: Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIGSection 9: Types of CIVIL Legal Presence https://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#9._Types You can see that the symbology is CORRECTLY and PERFECTLY applied, explained, and understood as applied to the three most famous tax…

Read More

Copilot: Is the IRS a PRIVATE or PUBLIC corporation?

INTRODUCTION: This interchange defines where IRS sits as far as PUBLIC or PRIVATE. The VP/IP symbology referred to here is: Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIGSection 2: Two Contexts for Legal Informationhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2._Two VP means VOLUNTARY Protection and includes civil statutes and franchises. IP means INVOLUNTARY Protection and includes only the common law, the constitution, and…

Read More

Copilot: Secular court meaning of “private person”

INTRODUCTION: For the purpose of this discussion: More on the subject of this section at: QUESTION 1: Is a human being not protected by the civil statutory law and protected only by the common law and the criminal law a “private person”? ANSWER 1: No — a human being who is protected only by common…

Read More

Copilot: How courts EVADE admitting there is an election or consent process

QUESTION 1: Is the process documented below accurate?: Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue CodeSection 3: Consequences/Effects of Electionshttps://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/#3._Consequences ANSWER 2: Short answer: The process described in the FTSIG document is accurate to its own framework — it explains elections in the Internal Revenue Code as voluntary acts that convert private…

Read More

Copilot: PRIVATE domicile v. PUBLIC domicile

QUESTION 1: Can someone have a domicile under the common law but not the civil law? ANSWER 1: Excellent question — and it goes right to the heart of the distinction between civil status and common law status. Domicile Under Common Law Domicile Under Civil Law Can They Diverge? Yes — someone can have a…

Read More

Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights

SOURCE: Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights, SEDM; https://sedm.org/copilot-judicial-conspiracy-to-censor-or-interfere-with-common-law-private-foreign-rights/ INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions proves that: The above realities are now reflected on the following page of this site accessible from the Civil/Political Jurisdiction->Acquiring a “Civil Status” Menu item as follows: Acquiring a “Civil Status”, Section 4: The TWO…

Read More

PROOF: Forcing you to become a POLITICAL “citizen” or interfering with “national of the United States” only status is a First Amendment violation

INTRODUCTION: This article proves: QUESTION 1: Are the statuses in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) all political statuses, civil statuses, or both in the case of: 1. “national of the United States”. 2. “citizen of the United States” 3. “a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States”…

Read More