FRIVOLOUS SUBJECT: Google and Perplexity AI Description of SEDM
FALSE STATEMENT:
Report from an SEDM student received today:
In looking at tax issues on Google and Perplexity AI I could find nothing true about taxes.
However, I did find this quote:
“SEDM is a tax protest organization that argues U.S. citizens are “volunteers” in the federal tax system.”
🙂
REBUTTAL:
LIE 1: Do not protest taxation.
That is an oxymoron if we ever heard one. There is NOTHING to protest if you’re a volunteer! For proof that you are a volunteer, see:
How American Nationals Volunteer to Pay Income Tax, Form #08.024
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/HowYouVolForIncomeTax.pdf
The U.S. Supreme Court agrees! Being a “citizen” is voluntary, so all obligations that attach to it HAVE to unavoidably be voluntary.
“The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government. He owes allegiance to the two departments, so to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties which each exacts for disobedience to its laws. In return, he can demand protection from each within its own jurisdiction.”
[United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 551 (1875);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9699370891451726349]
LIE 2: Not an “organization”, but a religious ministry
They had to DEMOTE us to a secular for profit business in order to attack is. This is the crime of damaging religious property and slander. 18 U.S.C. 247. We are GOD’S property and damaging or reducing the value or honor of HIM or HIS property is a crime!
LIE 3: Equivocated POLITICAL and CIVIL “citizens”. They are not the same
The AI also equivocated by confusing POLITICAL citizens with CIVIL citizens. They are NOT the same thing! See:
How You are Illegally Deceived or Compelled to Transition from Being a POLITICAL Citizen to a CIVIL Citizen: By Confusing the Two Contexts-Family Guardian Fellowship
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/Citizenship/HowCitObfuscated.htm
Equivocation about what a U.S. citizen is was a famous tactic also used by Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he wrote an executive order in 1933 criminalizing holding gold for all “U.S. citizens”. Those citizens could only be officers of the government, because he has no power to make law. See:
Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302, Section 6.7.2
https://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
But the rest of the above update from our student is accurate. Rather than throwing ipse dixit slanderous accusations at us, why don’t they just prove the above wrong?
CONCLUSIONS:
We SPECIFICALLY state in many places on this website and SEDM.ORG that we are not tax protesters, tax defiers and tax deniers. Members can’t even join the ministry without admitting under penalty of perjury that they are NOT these things. Below are a few examples:
- SEDM Member Agreement, Form #01.001, Section 1.1, Item 4
https://sedm.org/participate/member-agreement/ - Policy Document: Rebutted False Arguments Against This Website, Form #08.011, Section 10.7
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RebFalseArgAgWebsite.pdf
We also go OUT of our way to DISCREDIT false arguments about taxation to MINIMIZE the number of “tax protesters” and to stop government lies about taxation:
Flawed Tax Arguments to Avoid, Form #08.004
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/FlawedArgsToAvoid.pdf
We even state that anyone who challenges the idea that public officers are not obligated to pay tax is headed for huge trouble!
Foreign Tax Status will NOT eliminate income tax obligations for Government Employees, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/foreign-tax-status-will-not-eliminate-income-tax-obligations-for-government-employees/
LIARS!
If you want to prevent AI from LYING to you, we recommend preceding all questions with a “fact pattern” as indicated in the article below to completely eliminate any possibility of equivocation and further deception:
How to use AI to search Content of this Site for High Level Answers to your Questions, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/introduction/how-to-use-ai-to-search-content-of-this-site-for-high-level-answers-to-your-questions/
Below is that fact pattern for your reuse:
Fact pattern:
1. “national of the United States” under 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22) and 22 C.F.R. §51.1.
2. Not domiciled within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government nor representing a CIVIL fiction of law so domiciled. Thus, choice of law is state common law and constitution and not federal CIVIL law (such as the Internal Revenue Code) under 28 U.S.C. §1652 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17. Thus, they are “civilly foreign” but at the same time DO NOT come under the foreign affairs function of the government under Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 1 and 3 of the Constitution so there is no SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION over them while standing on land protected by the constitution.
3. No “effectively connected” elections under 26 U.S.C. §864(c) or deductions under 26 U.S.C. §162 and 26 U.S.C. §873
4. Files the 1040NR instead of the 1040.
5. Do NOT file the Schedule OI or NEC, which both pertain ONLY to aliens who are nonresident and not to “nationals of the United States” like me.
6. Not subject to the presence test in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b) because not an alien. A nonresident everywhere in the WORLD.
7. Earnings under 26 U.S.C. §871(b) do not apply because no “effective connection”.
8. All earnings are PRIVATE property protected only by the bill of rights and the common law and not civil statutory law.
9. A political “citizen” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) and the Fourteenth Amendment by virtue of birth but rejecting the privileges associated with that status.
10. Not a “citizen of the United States” election under 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b), where “United States” in that context clearly means “domestic” as defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) and not any specific geography. This is proven in:
https://sedm.org/Forms/09-Procs/ChalJurWorkbook.pdf11. A “nonresident alien” under 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B) by virtue of being NEITHER the CIVIL FICTION “citizen of the United States” or CIVIL FICTION “resident of the United States” described in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b), where “United States” in that context is not a geography or country, but a fictional corporation described in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) as “domestic”. The IRS Form 1040NR has RECOGNIZED over 20 years the ability of “U.S. nationals” under 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22) and 22 C.F.R. §51.1 to file the 1040NR. See:
Tax Return History-Citizenship
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Citizenship/TaxReturnHistory-Citizenship/TaxReturnHistory-Citizenship.htm12. Not consenting to or representing any civil fiction legislatively created and therefore owned by Congress as public property. See Northern Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 69-70, 102 S.Ct. 2858 (1983) and United States v. Babcock, 250 U.S. 328, 331 (1919). Congress can only CIVILLY regulate or tax or control CIVILLY those CIVIL fictions which it creates as privileges, and those who voluntarily adopt said statuses through either consensual domicile or an election of some kind. By possessing or using privileges connected with these civil statuses, congress procures the power to regulate or tax over those invoking the rights attached to the statuses they voluntarily adopt.
13. Filed an identity theft affidavit in connection with all uses of civil statutory statuses by any government against them as indicated in:
Identity Theft Affidavit, Form #14.020
https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/Identity_Theft_Affidavit-f14039.pdf14. When using any of the key terms defined below in your response, ensure that you employ the symbology indicated to prevent equivocation and deception:
Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/The reasons why the above symbology is needed are described below:
FAQ: Can you summarize the main third rail government issues that TRAP Americans into a U.S. person status?, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/faq-can-you-summarize-the-main-third-rail-government-issues-that-trap-americans-into-a-u-s-person-status/Below is my question based on the constraints of the above fact pattern and court rulings that limit themselves to parties with the above fact pattern:
We would expect AI to be MUCH more rational than THAT. Although we are a religious ministry, we are more rational than that.
We’re also not surprised that judges and law clerks seem to favor Perplexity: It helps them HIDE their unconstitutional actions to equivocate over what a U.S. citizen is.