Posts by ftsig-admin
Copilot: History of definitions for the word “domestic” and “United States” in the Internal Revenue Code
QUESTION 1: What year was the first definition of “domestic” in the Internal revenue code? Did it mean the same thing it means now? ANSWER 1: Alright — let’s trace this precisely, because the definition of “domestic” in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) has a long paper trail, and its meaning has been remarkably stable…
Read MoreCopilot: When did the liability statute disappear from the National Income Tax?
QUESTION 1: Has there ever been a statute creating liability for income tax at the national level since 1862? ANSWER 1: If by “statute creating liability” you mean a law that expressly imposes a legal duty on a named class of persons to pay a national‑level income tax, the historical record is surprisingly narrow —…
Read MoreCopilot: Do real “public officers” in Titles 5 and 10 of the U.S. Code always owe tax?
EDITORIAL: This website takes the position that if you work for any government, you should pay taxes to that government on your compensation. This is an unavoidable outgrowth of our stance that the I.R.C. Subtitles A and C income tax is a tax exclusively on the government. What could be better than a tax on…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(3) does NOT make all government or “U.S. source” income “gross income”
Microsoft Copilot. QUESTION 1: For the purposes of I.R.C. 864(c)(3) does it mean the following? “26 U.S.C. §864(c)(3) is how they make PRIVATE earnings NOT “effectively connected” into privileged “gross income” if you enter it on the 1040NR mistakenly and thereby DONATE it to Uncle Sam. 26 U.S.C. §864(c)(3) does NOT mean all payments from…
Read MoreCopilot: Meaning of civil statutory “services”
EDITORIAL: This series of questions demonstrates and explains the following facts: Once you volunteer to engage in “services” as a civil “person” officer of the national government within the U.S. Inc. Federal Corporation in a “DOMESTIC” (26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) status, you can no longer complain that you are a slave like some people mistakenly try…
Read MoreWhy Some People Need Us
EDITORIAL: Most people get sucked into the “U.S. person” government matrix because of what some people call “stinkin thinkin”. Psychology diagnoses this kind of thinking as the Dunning-Kruger Effect. This message is directed at those kinds of people, which is most people and was us at one time, to give them a perspective on why…
Read MoreCopilot: Defeating the Public Interest Doctrine in Munn v. Illinois
QUESTION 1: What does it mean to be “affected with a public interest” in Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113: “This brings us to inquire as to the principles upon which this power of regulation rests, in order that we may determine what is within and what without its operative effect. Looking, 126*126 then, to…
Read MoreCopilot: Can an obligation attached to a civil person in the future continue if the domicile or civil status that is the basis of it is extinguished before the date it triggers?
EDITORIAL: This series of questions surrounds whether past actions by American nationals who incorrectly made a “U.S. person” election by filing a 1040 form while working for the government and accumulating pension credits can under 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(6) be used to COMPEL that same American national filing as a nonresident alien and protected by the…
Read MoreCopilot: Can you lawfully consent to enlarge governmental powers?
EDITORIAL: On the subject of consent in the context of taxation, the U.S. Supreme Court said: “The constitutional right [Form #10.015] against unjust taxation [of PRIVATE, constitutionally protect property] is given for the protection of private property [Form #12.046], but it may be waived by those affected who consent [Form #05.003] to such action to…
Read MoreCopilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions proves that: The article also shows you how to litigate the above in a court of law and describe it to the jury. More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: There is no question that the national government has subject matter over its own property throughout the states of…
Read More