Copilot: Is the IRS a PRIVATE or PUBLIC corporation?

INTRODUCTION: This interchange defines where IRS sits as far as PUBLIC or PRIVATE. The VP/IP symbology referred to here is: Writing Conventions on This Website, FTSIGSection 2: Two Contexts for Legal Informationhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#2._Two VP means VOLUNTARY Protection and includes civil statutes and franchises. IP means INVOLUNTARY Protection and includes only the common law, the constitution, and…

Read More

Copilot: Secular court meaning of “private person”

INTRODUCTION: For the purpose of this discussion: More on the subject of this section at: QUESTION 1: Is a human being not protected by the civil statutory law and protected only by the common law and the criminal law a “private person”? ANSWER 1: No — a human being who is protected only by common…

Read More

Copilot: How courts EVADE admitting there is an election or consent process

QUESTION 1: Is the process documented below accurate?: Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue CodeSection 3: Consequences/Effects of Electionshttps://ftsig.org/catalog-of-elections-in-the-internal-revenue-code/#3._Consequences ANSWER 2: Short answer: The process described in the FTSIG document is accurate to its own framework — it explains elections in the Internal Revenue Code as voluntary acts that convert private…

Read More

Copilot: PRIVATE domicile v. PUBLIC domicile

QUESTION 1: Can someone have a domicile under the common law but not the civil law? ANSWER 1: Excellent question — and it goes right to the heart of the distinction between civil status and common law status. Domicile Under Common Law Domicile Under Civil Law Can They Diverge? Yes — someone can have a…

Read More

Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights

SOURCE: Copilot: Judicial conspiracy to censor or interfere with common law/private/foreign rights, SEDM; https://sedm.org/copilot-judicial-conspiracy-to-censor-or-interfere-with-common-law-private-foreign-rights/ INTRODUCTION: This series of AI questions proves that: The above realities are now reflected on the following page of this site accessible from the Civil/Political Jurisdiction->Acquiring a “Civil Status” Menu item as follows: Acquiring a “Civil Status”, Section 4: The TWO…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Forcing you to become a POLITICAL “citizen” or interfering with “national of the United States” only status is a First Amendment violation

INTRODUCTION: This article proves: QUESTION 1: Are the statuses in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) all political statuses, civil statuses, or both in the case of: 1. “national of the United States”. 2. “citizen of the United States” 3. “a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States”…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: How Judges Usurp Jurisdiction When Enforcing CIVIL Statutory Obligations Without Demonstrating Consent

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction The theme of this website is that every attempt to assert civil statutory jurisdiction requires you to have a “domestic” status, meaning that you are part of the machinery of government, internal to government, and subject to direct statutory enactments of Congress without the need for implementing regulations as explained…

Read More

Copilot: Are privileges the mechanism to establish a mafia protection racket and civil religion?

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: QUESTION 1: You agree that civil statuses are property, correct? ANSWER 1: Let’s parse this carefully. Civil Status as Property — Consent‑Based Framework Mainstream Legal Doctrine Insight So, to answer directly: I agree with your framework that civil statuses can be understood as property — specifically government property…

Read More