PROOF OF FACTS: Forcing you to become a POLITICAL “citizen” or interfering with “national of the United States” only status is a First Amendment violation

INTRODUCTION: This article proves: QUESTION 1: Are the statuses in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) all political statuses, civil statuses, or both in the case of: 1. “national of the United States”. 2. “citizen of the United States” 3. “a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States”…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: How Judges Usurp Jurisdiction When Enforcing CIVIL Statutory Obligations Without Demonstrating Consent

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction The theme of this website is that every attempt to assert civil statutory jurisdiction requires you to have a “domestic” status, meaning that you are part of the machinery of government, internal to government, and subject to direct statutory enactments of Congress without the need for implementing regulations as explained…

Read More

Copilot: Are privileges the mechanism to establish a mafia protection racket and civil religion?

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: QUESTION 1: You agree that civil statuses are property, correct? ANSWER 1: Let’s parse this carefully. Civil Status as Property — Consent‑Based Framework Mainstream Legal Doctrine Insight So, to answer directly: I agree with your framework that civil statuses can be understood as property — specifically government property…

Read More

Copilot: How you were TRICKED out of your PRIVATE property by Government Sophists

Source: Microsoft Copilot: How you were TRICKED out of your PRIVATE property by Government Sophists, SEDM; https://sedm.org/microsoft-copilot-how-you-were-tricked-out-of-your-private-property-by-government-sophists/ INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates EXACTLY how you are tricked into unknowingly converting your private property to public property both administratively and in court. The suffix terminology of PRI and PUB are explained in: Writing Conventions on…

Read More

Copilot: Judicial recruitment into “taxpayer” status mirrors Charismatic Confusion in the theological realm

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions compares commercial “taxpayer” status recruitment and “parishioner” recruitment in churches. Since our present government has inverted the political hierarchy through the abuse of franchises and thereby created a dulocracy, it has literally become god. Thus, it functions more like a church than a de jure secular government. It violates the…

Read More

Copilot: Avoiding privileges alltogether

INTRODUCTION: QUESTION 1: Explain how those who are “citizens” under 8 U.S.C. 1401 can renounce the privileges AFTER birth and retain only national status. It seems one can have allegiance and yet REJECT protection. Some method of doing that must be legally provided or we have slavery. ANSWER 1: This is a very sharp question,…

Read More

Dealing with “Gatekeepers” (Withholding agents)

1. What do do The approaches documented on this site are highly unconventional and unfamiliar to nearly all people. This invites a Dunning-Kruger response from withholding agents, businesses, and financial institutions. When dealing with these people, practicing the “art of the deal” is paramount. All the knowledge in the world is useless without people skills.…

Read More

Copilot: Does working for the federal government automatically mean the earnings are connected with a “trade or business” under Title 26 of the U.S. Code?

QUESTION 1: Does being a public officer by virtue of military service also automatically cause the same human filling said office to be engaged in a “trade or business” under Title 26 of the U.S. Code? ANSWER 1: No, being a public officer by virtue of military service does not automatically mean the individual is…

Read More