Posts by ftsig-admin
Copilot: Court Doctrines dealing with Proprietary Power
INTRODUCTION: Taxation of U.S. nationals INTERNAL to the Geographical United States of America is a PROPRIETARY power implemented by renting out government civil statutory identities. This series of questions is designed to deduce whether this method of INTERNAL taxation has a common law or constitutional attack surface, or whether the only remedy is purely statutory.…
Read MoreCarney’s message to the world: The rules no longer protect you
EDITORIAL: Ironically, all the arguments Carney makes at a national level about sovereignty and autonomy apply equally to personal sovereignty and autonomy: Thank you, Mr. Carney, for reminding us that what countries must do in relation to each other apply just as readily WITHIN a country to individuals in relation to their own regional government,…
Read MoreHOW TO: How to distinguish “sovereign power” from “proprietary power” in the context of taxation
TABLE OF CONTENTS: “The rich rules over the poor,And the borrower is servant to the lender.”[Prov. 22:7, Bible, NKJV] “The State in such cases exercises no greater right than an individual may exercise over the use of his own property when leased or loaned to others. The conditions upon which the privilege shall be enjoyed being…
Read MoreFAQ: Do you think the “U.S. citizen” election stateside is a valid franchise election or a misapplication of the 911(d)(3) provision?
INTRODUCTION: The main subject of this debate is SOVEREIGN POWER v. PROPRIETARY POWER. You can find an article how to discern the two below: HOW TO: How to distinguish “sovereign power” from “proprietary power” in the context of taxation, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/how-to-how-to-distinguish-sovereign-power-from-proprietary-power-in-the-context-of-taxation/ If you would like to know how to apply this information to the filing of…
Read MoreCopilot: How can I prove that “sovereign powers” of taxation under the constitution are limited to foreign affairs functions only?
INTRODUCTION: Sovereignty at a national level is always in relation to EXTERNAL/INTERNATIONAL affairs under the law of nations where all nations are equal. Proprietary power is INTERNAL. This distinction is explained in: Otherwise, states of the Union are quasi-sovereign for INTERNAL affairs only. This is consistent with: California Government Code – GOVTITLE 1. GENERAL [100…
Read MoreHOW TO: Distinguishing “Taxpayer” v. “Nontaxpayer” for “nonresident aliens”
1. INTRODUCTION This article provides information useful in distinguishing “taxpayers” from “nontaxpayers” in the case of “nonresident aliens” as described but not defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(3)(B). “Revenue Laws relate to taxpayers [instrumentalities, officers, employees, and elected officials of the national Government] and not to non-taxpayers [non-resident non-persons domiciled in states of the Union without the exclusive…
Read MoreAttachment to 1040NR Return for U.S. national filing as a “Nontaxpayer” and Private Party
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION: This attachment is intended for filing a 1040NR tax return to get all your money back as a U.S. national residing within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state and not engaged in an active government office or privilege. It is based upon: 1. Income taxation is a foreign affairs…
Read More“THE MATRIX” in a Nutshell
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. What “The Matrix” Means In FTSIG terminology, “The Matrix” = CIVIL legal membership in the State, understood as a Private Membership Association (PMA) that operates through civil statutes and public‑rights doctrine. Membership is not political citizenship; it is a civil franchise created by consent, domicile, or privilege election. The core confusion…
Read MoreCopilot: What’s the difference between “trade or business” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(26) and “effectively connected” in 26 U.S.C. 864(b)?
INTRODUCTION: “Effectively connected” defines a connection or bridge so that an NRA can’t escape a liability from a legitimate, taxable source by insulating himself with a foreign intermediary. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What is the difference between “effectively connected” in 26 U.S.C. 864 in the case of a nonresident alien and “trade…
Read MoreCopilot: How do you suggest improving our terminology relating to “civil status” in order to reduce the possibility of frivolous accusations?
QUESTION 1: You have previously said that our tendency to refer to civil statutory statuses in the civil statutory law as “civil statuses” is confusing and misleading. The basis for our doing so is the following documents: 1. Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008 https://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/RightToDeclStatus.pdf 2. Acquiring a “Civil…
Read More