FAQ: You state that American Nationals residing within the protections of the Constitution have to make an election before they can have taxable income under I.R.C. 871. What if they receive “income” from those who are privileged?
QUESTION: You state in the following that American Nationals residing within the protections of the Constitution have to make an election before they can have taxable income under I.R.C. 871: Catalog of Elections and Entity Types in the Internal Revenue CodeSection 7: Entering anything but PROFIT as “income” or “effectively connected” income on a tax…
FAQ: What happens when you perfectly invoke the third rail issues documented on this site to lawfully avoid all income tax?
QUESTION: What happens when you perfectly invoke the third rail issues documented on this site to lawfully avoid all income tax? ANSWER: We think the foreign tax status arguments documented on this website at this point are so perfected and complete, that the only way to stop the damn from breaking is to reject the…
FAQ: Why is your content needlessly bombastic and inflammatory? This can scare away large parts of your potential audience
“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.” [Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn] QUESTION: Why is your content needlessly bombastic and inflammatory? This can scare away large parts of your potential audience. The purpose of this comment is to attack what I regard as possible weaknesses that could expose you or…
FAQ: Since the Sixteenth Amendment begins with “The Congress”, does that mean that all taxes levied in Title 26 originate from the Sixteenth Amendment?
QUESTION: The language in 16A seems pretty broad. And there also seems to be multiple taxing methods in Title 26. Do you suppose that since the first two words of 16A is “The Congress,” that any and all taxes levied in Title 26 could be ARGUED to fall under 16A? If not, why not? For…
FAQ: Why Not create an individualPRI and individualPUB to distinguish the PUBLIC straw man from the PRIVATE human?
INTRODUCTION: This suggestion was eventually implemented. You can find it at: Writing Conventions on This Website, Section 1.1: Two Contexts for Legal Information, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#1.1._Two QUESTION: What do you think about “individual^PRI” and “Individual^PUB” when the word is used, to distinguish between PRIVATE individuals and PUBLIC individuals, just like domestic^C and domestic^J? You need to explain…
FAQ: Legitimacy of the U.S. Person Position
QUESTION 1: Do you think the government views the “U.S. person” status as integral to government? ANSWER 1: It is the MAIN method of perpetuating the fiat currency scam, recruiting free volunteers, perpetuating collectivism and socialism, and of making the constitution and the actual DELIVERABLE it is supposed to produce IRRELEVANT and UNNECESSARY: Private property.…
FAQ: How to discern PUBLIC from PRIVATE in Acts of Congress?
INTRODUCTION: For more information on this subject, see: Private Right or Public Right? Course, Form #12.044https://sedm.org/LibertyU/PrivateRightOrPublicRight.pdf QUESTION 1: What are some instances where an issue is articulated in the Constitution (APART from Art. I, § 8 subject matter) that Congress has subsequently created statutes for? ANSWER 1: Fourteenth Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §1983 QUESTION 2: Where…
FAQ: Questions About the U.S. Person Status
More on the subject of the U.S. Person status at: U.S. Person Position, Form #05.053https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/USPersonPosition.pdf QUESTION1: When it comes to the U.S. person status, what domicile is in effect—the agent’s or that of the status? ANSWER 1: The domicile of the office or status, which is that of its creator, is in effect. 4 U.S.C.…
FAQ: Why don’t you create a Telegram Channel to Discuss and improve the content of this site?
QUESTION: Why don’t you create a Telegram Channel to Discuss and improve the content of this site? ANSWER: Telegram is a poor choice for ftsig because: Most people want someone ELSE to either tell them what to do, do it for them, or someone to blame if things go wrong. We want to filter out…