FAQ: Legitimacy of the U.S. Person Position
QUESTION 1:
Do you think the government views the “U.S. person” status as integral to government?
ANSWER 1:
It is the MAIN method of perpetuating the fiat currency scam, recruiting free volunteers, perpetuating collectivism and socialism, and of making the constitution and the actual DELIVERABLE it is supposed to produce IRRELEVANT and UNNECESSARY: Private property. Thus, it is the GREATEST force of anarchy and evil that completely destroys, undermines, invalidates, and perpetuates the destruction of the entire purpose of government to begin with. That anarchy is exhaustively described in:
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/YourIrresponsibleLawlessGov.pdf
Thus, it is TREASON plain and simple as long as consent remains secret and invisible and never acknowledged by the courts.
QUESTION 2:
Does that translate into “Yes”?
ANSWER 2:
It is integral to the DE FACTO government, not to a DE JURE government. But we don’t have a de jure government:
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/DeFactoGov.pdf
QUESTION 3:
So in a de facto role, if a big corporation elected a “U.S. person” status for itself, and a worker did the same for himself, AND they both signed a W-4…then that would be DE FACTO “United States business.” No?
I think it’s important to underscore how it DOES IN FACT work. Only then can you reverse engineer it.
ANSWER 3:
As long as the consent remains invisible and either side does not receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to say no and be respected and not punished in that choice, or if the process causes a destruction between public and private by violating the separation of powers, then the process is de facto.
THEIR RESPONSE 3:
I agree with you 100%
OUR RESPONSE AND QUESTION 3:
For ONCE I don’t have to fight you.
If they never acknowledge consent, they are de facto. According to the Declaration of Independence, all just powers derive from consent. If they never acknowledge, respect, and protect consent, they aren’t a government and EVERYTHING they do is UNJUST by definition.
- Without that acknowledgement, how can you even determine whether you or your property is PRIVATE or PUBLIC and what you OWN and DON’T own?
- How can the reasonable notice requirement of the Constitution be satisfied.
- How can you be held accountable for the duties of an office you weren’t even aware you were filling?
- How can the Bill of Rights even be enforced without a clear definition of the sharp dividing line between public and private?
ABSURD!
The above is the ENTIRE basis of the State Action Doctrine and even the Official Immunity Doctrine: Police officers can’t be held accountable for violation of rights or the duties of an office if they never received notice they were violating someone else’s rights and what those rights specifically are.
Specifically HOW did you receive “reasonable notice” of how you became or elected to become THE “person” at I.R.C. 6671(b) and I.R.C. 7343 if your filing specifically defined everything on it as NOT deriving from any law of Congress and ONLY deriving from the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
THEIR ANSWER 3:
Well, I take a position of self-responsibility rather than victim. I would argue that the IRC and our nation’s jurisprudence provides all the reasonable notice that needs to be given.
Moral? No. Reasonable in a sinful, covetous world? Yes.
You know…the entire family can spend their Summer studying and figuring it out! 😂
OUR RESPONSE:
Sounds like SLAVERY induced by fear and propaganda to me. The government has no responsibility for ANYTHING. As long as you are working for them, why shouldn’t you have the same LACK of responsibility under the concept of equal protection and equal treatment?
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/YourIrresponsibleLawlessGov.pdf
So you are advocating hypocrisy: The only people responsible are those DUMB enough to volunteer without knowing that’s what they are doing?
What a HYPOCRITE you are. Pharisee.
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhoWerePharisees.pdf
EQUAL TREATMENT is the foundation of our government, but YOU want UNEQUAL treatment. Only the people and never their government are responsible. That’s ANARCHY. Anarchy happens when ANYONE is irresponsible, including government.
THEIR RESPONSE:
I don’t advocate it. I realize that is the reality of how it works. Believe me….i do not feel it is ideal.
But you can’t go into tax court or an audit and say, “I wasn’t notified.” That’ll never work.
OUR RESPONSE:
You can demand proof at the audit that you consented to convert your property from PRIVATE to PUBLIC before you have to account for it or pay them a kickback.
The only thing that belongs on the tax return is USPI.
The only thing a “taxpayer” public officer can handle or account for is PUBLIC property. Doing that to PRIVATE property is STEALING.
THEIR RESPONSE
I believe that once you know how it works, you take action.
That’s when they pull out everyone’s (not yours—you’ve been clear) W-4s and 1040s. Few people are capable of dealing with this topic.
OUR RESPONSE:
A public officer is LEGALLY DEFINED as someone “in charge of the property of the public” for a specific duration, in this case ONE YEAR in the context of a tax return.
As long as the franchise mark (SSN or TIN) was never consensually connected to private property and you even had the capacity to do so as a full time trustee of God, it remains private. All you have to do is define SSN in your tax return filing as PRIVATE and nonstatutory and beyond that point, there was not consensual conversion.
As a Christian, you also can’t CONSENT to convert PRIVATE property that belongs to God over to PUBLIC property if He owns everything and we are all trustees under the bible trust indenture and he never delegated authority to do so. Pull out the trust indenture, the Bible, and show where it says that.
God DID say “render to Caesar that which is Caesar’s”. But He NEVER said give what is God’s to Caesar. It had to START as Caesar’s property before you can owe a tax on it or have a duty connected with it. PROVE its Caesar’s and I’ll account for it and pay the kickback, is what I would say at the audit.
That’s an exercise of your religious faith. They can’t interfere with that. The essence of exercising your faith is acting as his full time trustee and keeping your property under his ownership so that you remain under the full-time protection of His law.
PROVE to me that it belonged to Caesar BEFORE the audit, Mr. IRS agent. If you can I’ll account for the PUBLIC property in my possession and RETURN the portion the code asks for. I need the constitutionally required REASONBLE notice of what is yours and what is mine and how mine got converted to yours. Without it, you’re just a PRESUMPTUOUS THIEF.