Posts Tagged ‘consent’
REFERENCE: Legal Constraints on Volunteering into Public CapacityPUB within United States government
INTRODUCTION: This article explores the legal and administrative constraints on how the volunteering process is both hidden and implemented throughout the I.R.C. It is between us and Microsoft Copilot 5.4. Below is a summary of that analysis: Comparison Table: Title 5 Public Officer vs Civil Statutory Volunteer vs De Facto Officer # Characteristic Title 5…
Read MoreFAQ: Doesn’t the constitution allow anyone to consent to anything through “comity” just like many other countries in the world can?
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: You begin the following article with a quote from Massachusetts v. United States SCOTUS opinion condoning comity and consent: Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-defeating-the-administrative-state/ The quote says: “We have repeatedly held that the Federal Government may impose appropriate conditions on the use of federal property or privileges [franchises,…
Read MoreCopilot: Secular court meaning of “private person”
INTRODUCTION: For the purpose of this discussion: More on the subject of this section at: QUESTION 1: Is a human being not protected by the civil statutory law and protected only by the common law and the criminal law a “private person”? ANSWER 1: No — a human being who is protected only by common…
Read MoreCopilot: Can you lawfully consent to enlarge governmental powers?
EDITORIAL: On the subject of consent in the context of taxation, the U.S. Supreme Court said: “The constitutional right [Form #10.015] against unjust taxation [of PRIVATE, constitutionally protect property] is given for the protection of private property [Form #12.046], but it may be waived by those affected who consent [Form #05.003] to such action to…
Read MoreCopilot: Are the government’s franchises lawfully executed under the U.C.C.?
EDITORIAL: This exchange establishes that: The “enfranchisement” happens between the 3rd party “recruiters” and their employees or contractors – via presumed “voluntary” consent to the terms established by Forms such as the W-4, W-9, etc., which allegedly identify the “qualified” franchisees (albeit in a rather confusing manner). Said forms are the chum made available to…
Read MoreWight v. Davidson, 181 U.S. 371 (1901)
LINK: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1202751686859480675 SIGNIFICANCE: Declared what “unjust taxation means” and that if you consent or make an election, the taxation is no longer UNJUST. QUOTE: “The constitutional right [Form #10.015] against unjust taxation is given for the protection of private property [Form #12.046], but it may be waived by those affected who consent [Form #05.003] to…
Read More