Posts by ftsig-admin
REFERENCE: Techniques for making Proprietary Power under civil statutes LOOK like Sovereign Power
INTRODUCTION: The modern civil‑statutory system operates through a structural illusion: proprietary power—which is voluntary, contractual, corporate, and created entirely by statute—is routinely disguised as sovereign power, which is involuntary, injury‑based, and constitutionally limited. This disguise is achieved through a set of judicial and administrative mechanisms that collapse the distinction between private capacityPRI (the natural person…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Sovereign power and proprietary power evolution, relationship to government ID, and contracting civil statutory proprietary jurisdiction out of your relationships
INTRODUCTION: More at: DOCTRINE: Court practices for establishing or exercising agency or capacity, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/doctrine-court-practices-for-establishing-or-exercising-agency-or-capacity/ QUESTION 1: “But, except as restrained and limited by that instrument, they possess and exercise the authority of independent States, and the principles of public law to which we have referred are applicable to them. One of these principles is, that…
Read MorePROOF: Tax Code is a State Sponsored Religion
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: According to 1 USC 204 legislative notes, title 26 has never been enacted into positive law. Thus: 1. It is prima facie evidence of law. 2. Prima facie means PRESUMED. 3. Presumptions that impair private rightsPRI and private propertyPRI violation constitutional due process. 4. Thus, the only thing it can…
Read MorePROOF: States of the Union are “foreign countries” and aliens with constitutional states do not satisfy the presence test in I.R.C. 7701(b)
INTRODUCTION: This article PROVES: LIARS! Money grubbers! If you’re an alien physically residing within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state, we have a new acronym for you: IRS:I = I’mR = ReallyS = Stupid The following articles ALSO prove that this same alien earns NO income under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)! More at: DEFINITIONS: Tax…
Read MoreREFERENCE: I.R.C. Subtitles A and C Statutory Capacities and Trigger Events
INTRODUCTION: This table was generated with Microsoft Copilot on 8/14/26. 1. Columns: 1. Column 1: #2. Column 2: Name3. Column 3: Statute4. Column 4: Classification:a. PUBb. PRIc. Classification only5. Trigger event6. Column 5: Explanation. 2. Rows ✅ Current Table State — 76 Statutory Capacities Section Rows Badge Foundational Definitions & Classifications (§7701) 1–7 🔘 Classification…
Read MoreHOW TO: Strategy for avoiding frivolous return penalties under 6702 and getting the IRS to accept and process your return
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: How would you suggest improving the following to make it more likely to be acceptable? 6. CHOICE OF LAW AND TERMS OF COMMERCIAL USE OF MY PROPERTY AND IDENTIFYING INFORMATION: 1. Amounts reported and received by the United States have been falsely characterized as proprietary “tax” and “withholding” by the payer and…
Read MorePROOF: Aliens under I.R.C. 871(a) FDAP incur no tax liability unless they volunteer for a public capacityPUB
INTRODUCTION: The only express liability found in I.R.C. Subtitle A is withholding agents on nonresident aliens who are aliens in 26 U.S.C. 1461. Everyone else is a volunteer. This leads to the question of how they can owe tax on Fixed, Determinable, Annual, and Periodical (FDAP) earnings under 26 U.S.C. 871(a). This series of questions…
Read MorePROOF: Income tax is a “rent an identity” service that turns “justice” into a privilege and INJUSTICE
INTRODUCTION: This series of Copilot questions proves with law and evidence that: More at: QUESTION 1: Because Proprietary Mode taxation exclusively under the Sixteenth Amendment depends on a personPUB to attach private propertyPRI to so it can be taxed, then: 1. Doesn’t the I.R.C. Subtitles A and C income tax function essentially as a “rent…
Read MoreHOW TO: Forcing Administrative State to expose presumption of PUBLIC capacityPUB and consideration provided to operate in that capacity
1. INTRODUCTION: These tactics are useful in administrative correspondence to force the agency into the legal equivalent of a “perpetual identity hearing” where they must expose all their secret presumptions and equivocation. In the process, they literally commit enforcement suicide by being compelled to expose WITH EVIDENCE that they have no enforcement authority at all,…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Biblical Perspective on Sovereign v. Proprietary Mode
INTRODUCTION: I. The Foundational Insight: The PRI → PUB Ontology The conversation established a structural ontology that explains the rise and fall of civilizations: Private Capacity (PRI) Public Capacity (PUB) This ontology is the backbone of the entire discussion. The central insight: Civilizations repeatedly convert sovereign power (PRI) into proprietary power (PUB) through legal mechanisms…
Read More