Posts by ftsig-admin
PROOF: Court/Administrative State PRESUMPTION of CIVIL Citizen**+D public capacityPUB is ILLEGAL
INTRODUCTION: The series of questions deals with capacity inversion caused by PRESUMING or enforcing the public capacity of “person” and “citizen of the United StatesJ” involuntarily on the average american. It uses authorities on the subject of “fictions of law”. The output is court ready arguments to oppose involuntary capacity inversion. More at: QUESTION 1:…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: Fiction
PROOF: Court/Administrative State PRESUMPTION of CIVIL Citizen**+D public capacityPUB is ILLEGAL, FTSIG-uses this articlehttps://ftsig.org/proof-court-administrative-state-presumption-of-civil-citizend-public-capacitypub-is-illegal/ FICTIO. In Roman law, a fiction; an assumption or supposition of the law. “Fictio” In the old Roman law was properly a term of pleading, and signified a false averment on the part of the plaintiff which the defendant was not…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Judicial Equivocation Terms and Methods
QUESTION 1: Produce a table documenting all the methods of judicial equivocation involving terms: Format the table as follows: For “Citizen”, statutory trigger is NOT 8 U.S.C. §§ 1401–1408. Its using United StatesJ on a government form instead of United StatesG and the effect of the Minimum Contacts Doctrine. Civil statutory obligations DO NOT attach to…
Read MoreREFERENCE: I.R.C. as a Licensing Scheme
INTRODUCTION: Introduction: The Constitutional Structure, the PUB/PRI Ontology, and the De Facto Federal Tax Regime This conversation has traced a comprehensive constitutional analysis of how federal tax law—particularly the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the Sixteenth Amendment—operates through a de facto system of public‑capacity creation that is not authorized by any express constitutional clause. The…
Read MorePROOF: Judicial Subject and Term Avoidance is Unconstitutional Exercise of Legislative Power
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: 1. Judges are not legislators. That’s reserved to the Legislative branch. 2. The most fundamental part of legislating is defining terms. 3. Thus judges can neither define or limit the definition of terms, either found in legislation or in the English dictionary. 4. To refuse to invoke or recognize (censor)…
Read MoreREFERENCE: History of “status crimes” and their Modern Equivalent- The Public Rights Doctrine
INTRODUCTION: Historical Lineage: Status Crimes → Public Rights Doctrine The discussion begins by tracing the evolution of status crimes in English poor‑law tradition — classifications such as pauper, vagabond, and idle person — which imposed civil regulation based not on wrongful acts but on conditions of dependency. Regulation applied only to those recognized as inhabitants,…
Read MorePROOF: Government says You aren’t ALLOWED to volunteer
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Introduction Conclusions INTRODUCTION This article provides evidence proving that the the government actually says the average PRIVATE American national is NOT legally allowed to volunteer. 1. Private property is NOT within the legislative jurisdiction of Congress Only within the criminal or common law and the sovereign mode of civil statutes may government…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: Legal validity
INTRODUCTION: This conversation explores how AI chatbots define “legal validity”. It is between Microsoft Copilot and us on 8/17/26. It establishes three criteria for legal validity: The main point of divergence between us and doctrine is “Interpretive validity”. QUESTION 1: Define “legal validity” ANSWER 1: Legal validity has a very specific meaning in jurisprudence. It…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Techniques for making Proprietary Power under civil statutes LOOK like Sovereign Power
INTRODUCTION: The modern civil‑statutory system operates through a structural illusion: proprietary power—which is voluntary, contractual, corporate, and created entirely by statute—is routinely disguised as sovereign power, which is involuntary, injury‑based, and constitutionally limited. This disguise is achieved through a set of judicial and administrative mechanisms that collapse the distinction between private capacityPRI (the natural person…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Sovereign power and proprietary power evolution, relationship to government ID, and contracting civil statutory proprietary jurisdiction out of your relationships
INTRODUCTION: More at: DOCTRINE: Court practices for establishing or exercising agency or capacity, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/doctrine-court-practices-for-establishing-or-exercising-agency-or-capacity/ QUESTION 1: “But, except as restrained and limited by that instrument, they possess and exercise the authority of independent States, and the principles of public law to which we have referred are applicable to them. One of these principles is, that…
Read More