Posts by ftsig-admin
CORRUPTION: Judges who advanced the corrupt “administrative state”
INTRODUCTION: More on the subject of the administrative state at: QUESTION 1: Who was oliver wendell holmes and what did he believe? ANSWER 1: Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was one of the most influential—and controversial—jurists in American history. He served as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1902 to 1932, and his…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Judicial Identity Laundering in Walby v. United States, 144 Fed.Cl. 1 (2019), Walby v. United States, 957 F.3d. 1295 (2020)
INTRODUCTION: This analysis looks at a case mentioned on the opening page of this site, in which the appeals court committed identity theft on the litigant. It applies the FTSIG identity laundering taxonomy to analyze the case. Below is how we described this case on the opening page: 3. Federal courts such as the Court…
Read MoreCORRUPTION: Identity Laundering Tactics by Judges and Administrative State that Destroy the Separation of Powers
INTRODUCTION: More at: QUESTION 1: Based on the library of identity laundering primitives, can you: 1. List all the methods that destroy the separation of powers between states and the federal government. 2. Give examples in court doctrine of each. 3. Explain the examples. ANSWER 1: Below is a structured, comprehensive, doctrine‑anchored answer that identifies…
Read MorePROOF OF FACTS: “United States” in I.R.C. 871(b), 864(b), and 6671(b) is the United StatesGOV, not a geography
INTRODUCTION: The main target of this site is U.S. nationals living within the exclusive jurisdiction of the states of the Union. These people are nonresident aliens by default, which means the only thing taxable for them is found in 26 U.S.C. 871. We prove that only aliens are subject to 26 U.S.C. 871(a). PROOF OF…
Read MoreREFERENCE: FTSIG Symbology for “Identity Laundering” by Judges and Administrative State
INTRODUCTION: This inquiry formalizes into a standardized symbology system that documents the corrupt government tactics documented below and in the Holy Bible: How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardianhttps://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm Section 5 of the above describes the “biblical doctrine” that is the core of the modern corrupt administrative state. We have codified the…
Read MoreREFERENCE: Mapping FTSIG Capacity Inversion to Mainstream Academic Terminology and Sources
QUESTION 1: What terminology is used in legal scholarship to describe what ftsig calls “capacity inversion”? ANSWER 1: Concise answer: In mainstream legal scholarship, the phenomenon that FTSIG calls capacity inversion is not labeled with that exact term, but it is recognized under several established doctrinal categories. The closest matches—conceptually and functionally—are: Each of these…
Read MoreCopilot: IRS Misrepresentation of Income Tax as NOT an excise and refusal to recognize the activity subject to tax and how to unvolunteer
INTRODUCTION: The Invisible Sign-up It’s the grandest “Gotcha!” the world’s ever seen,A “Voluntary” system that’s remarkably mean.They hide the word EXCISE behind a thick veil,So you think it’s a burden you cannot curtail.But an excise requires a specific “event,”A privileged action or corporate descent. If you’re just a man standing tall on the soil,Trading your hours and…
Read MoreCopilot: Can a U.S. national filing a 1040NR return have INVOLUNTARY ECI?
QUESTION 1: 1. You previously said that: 1.1. Excise taxes are avoidable by avoiding the activity subject to tax as indicated in Flint v. Stone Tracy. 1.2. The income tax under I.R.C. Subtitle A is not an excise tax or a privilege tax but an indirect tax. You used Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad in…
Read MoreCopilot: I.R.C. Sections 61, 861, and 862 don’t apply to Nonresident Aliens
INTRODUCTION: This article discusses the taxabilility of earnings of nonresident aliens under 871 and what sections of the I.R.C govern that taxability. For the purposes of this discussion: 1. The United States in 864(c), (b) are BOTH United StatesGOV/J. So “source in the United States” can only mean that: PROOF OF FACTS: “trade or business…
Read More26 CFR 31.6091-1 Where to File Employer Returns under Subtitle C
The Statutory Mandate for Filing with the District Director in Baltimore This article deals with EMPLOYER returns such as the forms W-2 and W-3 under Subtitle C of the I.R.C., and NOT tax returns under subtitle A. Part 31 is for employers Under Subtitle C, not ordinary filers of 1040-NR returns. Filers of tax returns…
Read More