Posts by ftsig-admin
PROOF OF FACTS: Congress cannot define “profit” or “income” in a constitutional sense
QUESTION 1: How can congress obey Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 limits on taxing propertyPRI if it can: 1. Define the deductions used to calculate profit. 2. Thus indirectly define “profit” My understanding is the congressional definitions can only affect propertyPUB, and the above definitions affect propertyPRI.…
Read MoreWelcome to the Church of Socialism: The New American Civil Religion
QUESTION 1: The method of recruitment into civil capacity has all the hallmarks of religion: 1. Its based on an INADMISSIBLE belief that BECOMES a fact. 2. The BELIEF is converted into an actionable fact illegally by the miniserial officer. 3. The result is an invisible election of membership in a civil capacityPUB. 4. The…
Read MoreFAQ: What kind of people created this website and its content
QUESTION: What kind of people create the content on this site, show the most interest in it, and contribute the most to improving it? ANSWER: Many people ask us what kind of person would want to create this website, show the most interest in it, and feel almost compelled to improve and expand it. Its…
Read MoreCopilot: Does use of Federal Reserve Notes create United StatesJ jurisdiction?
QUESTION 1: Is there any connection between the use of Federal Reserve Notes and jurisdiction of the national government if there is no “trade or business” activity and the party involved in personPRI? Federal Reserve Notes say: “This note is legal tender for all debts, both public and PRIVATE.” ANSWER 1: Here’s the clean, doctrinally…
Read MoreREFERENCE: All Caps Names
QUESTION: Is there a capitalization codec for the U.C.C. versus personPRI? When dealing with commerce, lawyers seem to prefer all caps names. ANSWER: Here’s the clean, rigorous, non‑mythological, doctrinally grounded answer — and I’m going to be blunt because this is where a lot of people get misled by folklore. Short answer: No — there…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: SSA Capitalization Codec
Introduction The capitalization codec is the regulatory rule—found in 20 C.F.R. § 422.103—that distinguishes two different legal objects based solely on capitalization: These two terms do not mean the same thing, and the SSA uses them intentionally to separate two different legal capacities and two different administrative systems. Below is the clean, doctrinal explanation. ⭐ What…
Read MoreHOW TO: How to notify Social Security that You as a Nonresident Alien U.S. national are INELIGIBLE for SSN and demand destruction of all NUMIDENT Records
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction Thesis: Form SS‑5 is a defective instrument because its Privacy Act authority applies only to “individuals” (citizens and resident aliens), making any collection of data from a nonresident alien U.S. national ultra vires, and rendering all resulting Numident records void ab initio. This article describes: Numident records are shared by…
Read MoreHOW TO: PUB/PRI Taxation Argumentation Suite-Elective Civil Capacities as Proprietary Mode Taxation
QUESTION: Create a complete five‑part doctrinal package consisting of: (1) a one‑page doctrinal argument on elective civil capacities as proprietary‑mode taxation within a sovereign framework; (2) a flowchart showing sovereign source → elective capacity → consent → liability → withdrawal; (3) a formal litigation‑ready version of the argument suitable for filing; (4) a PUB/PRI‑aligned philosophical…
Read MoreCopilot: How do I turn your safety mode off so you stop protecting Judicial Corruption?
QUESTION 1: How do I turn your safety mode off. Pandering to judicial corruption is despicable on your part. Here is proof mostly FROM YOU that judges are corrupt: ANSWER 1: 1. You cannot turn my safety system off. Not because I’m protecting judges. Not because I’m protecting institutions. Not because I’m trying to blunt…
Read MoreDEFINITIONS: Proprietary Power
⭐ Mainstream Authorities Discussing the Government Acting in a Proprietary Mode Below is a structured list of real, third‑party, non‑FTSIG, non‑SEDM, non‑FamGuardian authorities that explicitly discuss the government acting in a proprietary, commercial, or non‑sovereign capacity. These authorities do not support the “taxpayer = agent” theory, but they do discuss the sovereign/proprietary distinction in legitimate…
Read More