FAQ: Can you summarize the main third rail government issues that TRAP Americans into a U.S. person status?
QUESTION:
Can you summarize the main third rail government issues that TRAP Americans into a U.S. person status?
ANSWER:
Nearly all Americans born in the country United States* are nonresident aliens by default. They are trapped into a U.S. person status through the following means of equivocation:
- Equivocating LEGALLY present with PHYSICALLY present.
1.1. PHYSICAL PRESENCE: The civil statutory Presence Test in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1) deals ONLY with PHYSICAL presence and not LEGAL presence and deals ONLY with aliens and not American nationals.
1.2. LEGAL PRESENCE: Deals only with LEGAL presence within a CIVIL venue as documented in the Minimum Contacts Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court in International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. Chapter 97.
1.3. “Effectively connecting” in 26 U.S.C. §864(c) fulfills the LEGAL PRESENCE aspect, and yet courts refuse to identify this as a product of consent and election, trying to make you LOOK like you are PHYSICALLY present. See: Walby v. United States, 144 Fed.Cl. 1 (2019), Walby v. United States, 957 F.3d. 1295 (2020).
1.4. We cover this subject in:
Acquiring a “Civil Status”, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/acquiring-a-civil-status/ - Defining “DOMESTIC” and “FOREIGN” in the context of ONLY whether you INSIDE or OUTSIDE the government. See:
2.1. 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) and (5)
2.2. Definition: “Domestic” (inside the government as a public officer/agent participating in franchises)
https://ftsig.org/definitions-domestic/
2.3. Definition: “Foreign” (outside the government)
https://ftsig.org/definitions-foreign/ - Equivocating CIVIL jurisdiction with POLITICAL jurisdiction.
3.1. You can be a POLITICAL citizen without being a CIVIL citizen under the laws of the national government.
3.2. You can be subject to the POLITICAL jurisdiction of the national government while not having a DOMICILE within the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress that gives rise to CIVIL obligations. - Equivocating POLITICAL “citizens*” under 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) with CIVIL “citizens**+D” in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) and (b). See:
Civil/Political Jurisdiction, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/ - Equivocating the GEOGRAPHICAL “United States” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 4 U.S.C. §110(d), and 26 U.S.C. §871(a) with the LEGAL/CORPORATE “United States” identified in 26 U.S.C. §871(b) (“trade or business”). See:
Which “United States” are you “in”?, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/#2._Which - Calling DOMESTIC/INTERNAL taxes “direct unapportioned” taxes, but taking the phrase “direct tax” out of its constitutional context.
6.1. FOREIGN/CONSTITUTIONAL income taxes are upon PRIVATE property.
6.2. DOMESTIC/INTERNAL taxes are in fact taxes upon PROPERTY ownership, but the property subject to tax is PUBLIC property not PRIVATE property.
More on the above at:
Microsoft Copilot: Is the income tax a DIRECT tax or an INDIRECT tax?, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-the-income-tax-a-direct-tax-or-an-indirect-tax/ - Using the word “citizenship” to AVOID specifying whether they are referring to nationality or domicile, so they can falsely make you believe the two are equivalent. That way they can AVOID describing which of the two components of your status: civil or political, is the origin of their jurisdiction and authority in any given case.
7.1. Courts cannot operate in a political capacity so they have no jurisdiction merely out of nationality, unless they are enforcing ONLY the immigration laws to deport or naturalize people. See:
Political Jurisdiction, Form #05.004
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/PoliticalJurisdiction.pdf
7.2. The origin of most jurisdiction exercised by any court originates in voluntary domicile and civil jurisdiction. Franchises and privileges originate from this jurisdiction.
See:
Civil/Political Jurisdiction menu above
https://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/ - By refusing to acknowledge that there are MANY types of “nonresident aliens” IN ADDITION to aliens. This scares American nationals away from the status. For a list of these types, see:
Writing Conventions on This Website, Section 8: Types of Nonresident Aliens, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/introduction/writing-conventions-on-this-website/#8._Types
All of the above methods of equivocation have the goal and effect of:
- Producing plausible deniability for them in protecting themselves from the charge of THEFT of your property or of jurisdiction.
- Allowing judges and administrative branch employees to operate in violation of the separation of powers by assuming or imputing a context or meaning to a word or definition that is inconsistent with the constitution and violates private rights. It violates the separation of powers by allowing them to effectively LEGISLATE whatever definition or context for the term that benefits them commercially and personally in violation of 18 U.S.C. §208, 28 U.S.C. §144, and 28 U.S.C. §455.
- Causing you to inadvertently DONATE your private property as a literal BRIBE to get them to treat you AS IF you are an officer or employee of the national government. Paying them a tax you wouldn’t otherwise owe is a bribe, and you can’t owe it UNLESS you area a public officer or agent. Being a “taxpayer” is what it means to be a CIVIL “person” (26 U.S.C. §6671)engaged in the “trade or business” excise taxable franchise (Form #05.001). This is a crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. §201 and 18 U.S.C. §210.
- Making YOUR consent to their CIVIL jurisdiction INVISIBLE so that you in effect are compelled to donate your private property to them because of your legal ignorance about the source of their jurisdiction and how to avoid it. Below is more information on that subject:
Invisible Consent, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/invisible-consent/
DEFINITIONS THAT DESTROY THE EQUIVOCATION AND EXPOSE THESE THIRD RAIL ISSUES:
Below are the darkest third rail secrets of the tax system that trap them into a U.S. person status through mainly equivocation:
- “Domestic” = inside U.S. Inc. federal corporation. “Domestic” has two contexts:
1.1. domesticS: Within the United StatesGOV (or United StatesSMJ/USPI); and
1.2. domesticG: Within United StatesG (which is a geographical curtain in front of 1. which is ALWAYS understood to be manifest when a geographical context is presented. - Those partaking of privileges are domestic officers/agents of uncle.
- You have to volunteer to be “domestic”.
- If you don’t volunteer, you retain your “foreign”, private, and constitutionally protected civil status.
- There are TWO types of foreign:
5.1. CIVILLY FOREIGN: born inside the country or incorporated within a state but not domiciled within exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.
5.2. POLITICALLY FOREIGN: Born or incorporated in a foreign country but a privileged alien. - Corrupt government hides the true source (U.S., Inc.) behind the geographical definitions so that everyone misapplies the tax. It’s always VERY IMPORTANT that when you address US Inc., that you present it as being hidden behind one of two geographical masks:
6.1. Within United StatesG (domestic).
6.2. Without United StatesG (CIVILLY foreign). - “Income” and “gross income” are always “domestic” PUBLIC property of the national government that became so by virtue of EITHER CONSTITUTIONAL alienage or CIVIL elections by CIVILLY foreign American nationals:
7.1. 26 U.S.C. §861 is US Inc. by or through the geographical source: within the United StatesG; and
7.2. 26 U.S.C. §862 is U.S., Inc. by or through the other geographical source: without the United StatesG. - Both §§ 861 & 862 are ultimately United StatesGOV/ U.S., Inc. / USPI /United StatesSMJ/domesticS, but the two sections simply parse out WHERE that domesticS payment came from.
- United StatesGOV = USPI = United StatesSMJ = domesticS. And that primary source can be geographically obtained:
9.1. Within United StatesG = domesticG.
9.2. Without United StatesG = non-domesticG.
Third rail government issues are further explored in:
Third Rail Government Issues, Form #08.032
https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/ThirdRailIssues.pdf