Digging Deeper
EDITORIAL: This debate surrounds what is “included” in FDAP items listed under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)(1). It does so in the context of a recent PGA golf prize winner who is an alien in relation to United States* and whether his golf winnings would be considered FDAP if he filed as a nonresident alien. THEIR STATEMENT:…
Read MoreFALSE STATEMENT: An “individual” is just a human being or natural person in the code and not a privileged fictional entity. REBUTTAL: Anything Congress legislatively creates they own. “All subjects over which the sovereign power of a state extends, are objects of taxation; but those over which it does not extend, are, upon the soundest…
Read MoreEDITORIAL: For more information on this subject, see: The fact that its called INTERNAL Revenue Service implies its INTERNAL to the corporation, which is NONGEOGRAPHICAL. Good luck proving that INTERNAL means INTERNAL to the geographical United States. I’ve been searching for that kind of info for years. The party with the burden of proof is…
Read MoreQUESTION 1: Would it be accurate to say that earnings under 26 U.S.C. 871(a)(1) relate to PROFIT from wages and not the gross receipt of wages, since everything listed there as FDAP relates to “fixed or determinable annual or periodical gains, profits, and income,”? ANSWER 1: Your question involves interpreting 26 U.S.C. § 871(a)(1), a…
Read MoreEDITORIAL: The following debate between us and a member deals with how nonresident aliens get their “reasonable notice” of obligation and the origin and extend of that obligation. STATEMENT: Statutes precede regs—we know this. The starting point for the taxation of NRAs per statute is: In the regs it starts here: 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) =…
Read MoreEDITORIAL: For an extended debate about whether there is such a thing as a CIVIL “non-person” or “non-individual”, see: Policy Document: IRS Fraud and Deception About the Statutory Word “Person”, Form #08.023, Section 20https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/IRSPerson.pdf STATEMENT: I cracked the code on “individual.” They are sneaky! The attempts to coverup confirm the schemes! I found where a…
Read MoreEDITORIAL: 26 U.S.C. §1461 is the ONLY statute making anyone liable for ANYTHING in Internal Revenue Code Subtitle A. It limits itself to “nonresident aliens and foreign corporations”. Thus, 26 U.S.C. §1461 is deceptive because it doesn’t distinguish between “nonresident aliens” who are NATIONALS and those who are ALIENS. This is done to dissuade American…
Read MoreQUESTION 1: What are the elements of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case for discrimination? ANSWER 1: A 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case for discrimination typically involves the following elements: It’s essential to note that the specific elements and requirements may vary depending on the jurisdiction, the nature of the claim, and the rights at…
Read MoreSOURCE: Meta AI. 2/26/25 EDITORIAL: More on the Public Rights Doctrine discussed in this interchange at: Catalog of U.S. Supreme Court Doctrines, Litigation Tool #10.020https://sedm.org/Litigation/10-PracticeGuides/SCDoctrines.pdf The de facto government described in this exchange is further characterized in: This exchange NUKES all of Washington, DC. It’s WASHING….a TON of laundered money stolen from you in the…
Read More