Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery

This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:

SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/

You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/

REMEMBER: When querying AI:

1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.

This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.

AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.

Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:

Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/

AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.

AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:

1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.

Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.

And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.

The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.

Copilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”

By ftsig-admin / August 30, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions proves that: The article also shows you how to litigate the above in a court of law and describe it to the jury. More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: There is no question that the national government has subject matter over its own property throughout the states of…

Copilot: Are the criminal provisions of the I.R.C. actually penal provisions tied to voluntary franchise provisions?

By ftsig-admin / August 28, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Are the criminal provisions of the I.R.C. actually penal provisions tied to voluntary franchise provisions?

QUESTION 1: What legal criteria would a judge use to distinguish a criminal statute and the penal provisions of a franchise contract? Title 18 lists all the federal crimes but the I.R.C. has its own penal violations that seem to limit themselves to officers or employees of federal corporations in 26 U.S.C. 7343. ANSWER 1:…

Copilot: Are the government’s franchises lawfully executed under the U.C.C.?

By ftsig-admin / August 27, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Are the government’s franchises lawfully executed under the U.C.C.?

EDITORIAL: This exchange establishes that: The “enfranchisement” happens between the 3rd party “recruiters” and their employees or contractors – via presumed “voluntary” consent to the terms established by Forms such as the W-4, W-9, etc., which allegedly identify the “qualified” franchisees (albeit in a rather confusing manner). Said forms are the chum made available to…

Copilot: How Courts Defend the Theft of Property Through Taxation

By ftsig-admin / July 22, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: How Courts Defend the Theft of Property Through Taxation

QUESTION 1: Please itemize all the ways that courts defend the theft of property through taxation, including such things as: 1. Refusing to apply property law. 2. How taxation always involves converting private property to public property. 3. How the conversion from private to public must always be consensual. 4. How government’s main job is…

Copilot: Deception about “foreign” found in 26 U.S.C. 911

By ftsig-admin / July 19, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Deception about “foreign” found in 26 U.S.C. 911

QUESTION 1: So if Form 8840 is used by an alien in a constitutional state who wants to associate with the state instead of the national government, and 26 C.F.R. 301.7701(b)-2 refers to 26 U.S.C. 911, does that mean 26 U.S.C. 911 applies to people in a constitutional state? ANSWER 1: You’re asking a beautifully…

Copilot: Analysis of Tax Status Diagram

By ftsig-admin / July 16, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Analysis of Tax Status Diagram

EDITORIAL: “Federal preemption converts an otherwise foreign civil status established through domicile in a local jurisdiction, to that of a domestic status, when elected, within United States jurisdiction.” [FTSIG] This analysis deals with the following article and diagrams therein: Nationality, Citizenship, and Tax Status – How They Differ, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/nationality-citizenship-and-tax-status-how-they-differ/ The above diagram + the AI…

Copilot: Are aliens standing on constitutionally protected land protected from direct taxes on private property in Article 1, Section 2. Clause 3?

By ftsig-admin / July 13, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Are aliens standing on constitutionally protected land protected from direct taxes on private property in Article 1, Section 2. Clause 3?

EDITORIAL: This interchange is very useful in learning ways to attack MANDTORY participation in franchises. A “resident alien” under 26 U.S.C. 7701(b)(1)(A) is a COMPELLED franchisee. At the moment, if you are an alien who meets the presence test, the ONLY way you can file as a nonresident alien is to be married to one…

Copilot: Schedule NEC DOES NOT apply to U.S. Nationals

By ftsig-admin / July 9, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Schedule NEC DOES NOT apply to U.S. Nationals

QUESTION 1: Can you show me evidence that the Schedule NEC is only for use by aliens who are nonresident aliens but cannot be used by U.S. nationals? ANSWER 1: Absolutely. The key lies in the definition of who files Form 1040-NR, which is the only form to which Schedule NEC can be attached. Schedule…

Copilot: Tax Computation Process for Nonresident Aliens

By ftsig-admin / July 7, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: Tax Computation Process for Nonresident Aliens

QUESTION 1: Is this the proper method of computing taxable income for a nonresident alien? 1. I.R.C. 61 is gross income. 2. I.R.C. 861/862 breaks that 61 gross income into within and without the U.S. 3. I.R.C. 862 is peeled off because not a U.S. source. I.R.C. 872 (exclusions) IMPLEMENTS the filtering of 862. 4.…

Copilot: IRS Deception About who are “nonresident aliens”

By ftsig-admin / July 7, 2025 / Comments Off on Copilot: IRS Deception About who are “nonresident aliens”

QUESTION 1: IRS Publication 519 identifies itself as “U.S. tax guide for aliens”. However, it addresses nonresident aliens who are “U.S. nationals”. A U.S. national under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) is not an alien. And the word “alien” is defined in 26 C.F.R. 1.1441-1(c)(3)(i) as someone who is NEITHER a citizen nor a national. Does that…