Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery
This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:
SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/
You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/
REMEMBER: When querying AI:
1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.
This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.
AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.
Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:
Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/
AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.
AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:
1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.
Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.
And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.
The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.
Source: Microsoft Copilot: How you were TRICKED out of your PRIVATE property by Government Sophists, SEDM; https://sedm.org/microsoft-copilot-how-you-were-tricked-out-of-your-private-property-by-government-sophists/ INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates EXACTLY how you are tricked into unknowingly converting your private property to public property both administratively and in court. The suffix terminology of PRI and PUB are explained in: Writing Conventions on…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions compares commercial “taxpayer” status recruitment and “parishioner” recruitment in churches. Since our present government has inverted the political hierarchy through the abuse of franchises and thereby created a dulocracy, it has literally become god. Thus, it functions more like a church than a de jure secular government. It violates the…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions demonstrates how: More on the above at: QUESTION 1: Is it possible to serve in a public office in two departments of the national government at the same time? ANSWER 1: Great question — this touches on the constitutional and statutory rules about holding multiple offices in the U.S. federal…
INTRODUCTION: QUESTION 1: Explain how those who are “citizens” under 8 U.S.C. 1401 can renounce the privileges AFTER birth and retain only national status. It seems one can have allegiance and yet REJECT protection. Some method of doing that must be legally provided or we have slavery. ANSWER 1: This is a very sharp question,…
QUESTION 1: Does being a public officer by virtue of military service also automatically cause the same human filling said office to be engaged in a “trade or business” under Title 26 of the U.S. Code? ANSWER 1: No, being a public officer by virtue of military service does not automatically mean the individual is…
INTRODUCTION: The Ordinary Meaning Canon applies to scenarios where a word appears in a statute but is never defined. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: Does the Ordinary Meaning Canon of statutory construction imply the PRIVATE context for the word, or the PUBLIC context for a word? See: Congressional Research Service Report R45153, Statutory…
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: The California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 6017 and 17018 suggest that there are actually TWO Californias: 1. The de jure state under its organic constitution. 2. A de facto federal corporation acting as an agent of the national government over federal property consistent with the definition…
QUESTION 1: 1. A public officer is legally defined as someone IN CHARGE of the property of the public. 2. Civil statutory statuses are legislatively created and owned by their government creator. 3. Invoking a civil statutory status within a government statute is an acceptance and use of public property by those so doing. QUESTIONS:…
INTRODUCTION: This line of questions documents the “beach-head” in the fight against government franchises and how to fight them. Background information on this subject for those wishing to study further: QUESTION 1: Can you give me a list of authorities forbidding any state from offering franchises or privileges through civil statutes to people in other…
QUESTION 1: What specific constitutional provision authorizes taxation of government employees ONLY? Is it Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2? ANSWER 1: No, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2—known as the Property Clause—does not authorize taxation of government employees. That clause gives Congress the power to manage and regulate federal territories and property, stating: “The…