Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery

This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:

SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/

You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/

REMEMBER: When querying AI:

1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.

This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.

AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.

Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:

Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/

AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.

AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:

1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.

Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.

And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.

The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.

Microsoft Copilot: Meaning of civil statutory “services”

By ftsig-admin / September 3, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Meaning of civil statutory “services”

EDITORIAL: This series of questions demonstrates and explains the following facts: Once you volunteer to engage in “services” as a civil “person” officer of the national government within the U.S. Inc. Federal Corporation in a “DOMESTIC” (26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(4) status, you can no longer complain that you are a slave like some people mistakenly try…

Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Public Interest Doctrine in Munn v. Illinois

By ftsig-admin / September 2, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Public Interest Doctrine in Munn v. Illinois

QUESTION 1: What does it mean to be “affected with a public interest” in Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113: “This brings us to inquire as to the principles upon which this power of regulation rests, in order that we may determine what is within and what without its operative effect. Looking, 126*126 then, to…

Microsoft Copilot: Can an obligation attached to a civil person in the future continue if the domicile or civil status that is the basis of it is extinguished before the date it triggers?

By ftsig-admin / August 31, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Can an obligation attached to a civil person in the future continue if the domicile or civil status that is the basis of it is extinguished before the date it triggers?

EDITORIAL: This series of questions surrounds whether past actions by American nationals who incorrectly made a “U.S. person” election by filing a 1040 form while working for the government and accumulating pension credits can under 26 U.S.C. 864(c)(6) be used to COMPEL that same American national filing as a nonresident alien and protected by the…

Microsoft Copilot: Can you lawfully consent to enlarge governmental powers?

By ftsig-admin / August 31, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Can you lawfully consent to enlarge governmental powers?

EDITORIAL: On the subject of consent in the context of taxation, the U.S. Supreme Court said: “The constitutional right [Form #10.015] against unjust taxation [of PRIVATE, constitutionally protect property] is given for the protection of private property [Form #12.046], but it may be waived by those affected who consent [Form #05.003] to such action to…

Microsoft Copilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”

By ftsig-admin / August 30, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Limits of federal authority in states of the Union derived from Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 jurisdiction and its affect on Constitutional/Private “persons”

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions proves that: The article also shows you how to litigate the above in a court of law and describe it to the jury. More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: There is no question that the national government has subject matter over its own property throughout the states of…

Microsoft Copilot: Are the criminal provisions of the I.R.C. actually penal provisions tied to voluntary franchise provisions?

By ftsig-admin / August 28, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Are the criminal provisions of the I.R.C. actually penal provisions tied to voluntary franchise provisions?

QUESTION 1: What legal criteria would a judge use to distinguish a criminal statute and the penal provisions of a franchise contract? Title 18 lists all the federal crimes but the I.R.C. has its own penal violations that seem to limit themselves to officers or employees of federal corporations in 26 U.S.C. 7343. ANSWER 1:…

Microsoft Copilot: Are the government’s franchises lawfully executed under the U.C.C.?

By ftsig-admin / August 27, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Are the government’s franchises lawfully executed under the U.C.C.?

EDITORIAL: This exchange establishes that: The “enfranchisement” happens between the 3rd party “recruiters” and their employees or contractors – via presumed “voluntary” consent to the terms established by Forms such as the W-4, W-9, etc., which allegedly identify the “qualified” franchisees (albeit in a rather confusing manner). Said forms are the chum made available to…

Microsoft Copilot: How Courts Defend the Theft of Property Through Taxation

By ftsig-admin / July 22, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: How Courts Defend the Theft of Property Through Taxation

QUESTION 1: Please itemize all the ways that courts defend the theft of property through taxation, including such things as: 1. Refusing to apply property law. 2. How taxation always involves converting private property to public property. 3. How the conversion from private to public must always be consensual. 4. How government’s main job is…

Microsoft Copilot: Deception about “foreign” found in 26 U.S.C. 911

By ftsig-admin / July 19, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Deception about “foreign” found in 26 U.S.C. 911

QUESTION 1: So if Form 8840 is used by an alien in a constitutional state who wants to associate with the state instead of the national government, and 26 C.F.R. 301.7701(b)-2 refers to 26 U.S.C. 911, does that mean 26 U.S.C. 911 applies to people in a constitutional state? ANSWER 1: You’re asking a beautifully…

Microsoft Copilot: Analysis of Tax Status Diagram

By ftsig-admin / July 16, 2025 / Comments Off on Microsoft Copilot: Analysis of Tax Status Diagram

EDITORIAL: “Federal preemption converts an otherwise foreign civil status established through domicile in a local jurisdiction, to that of a domestic status, when elected, within United States jurisdiction.” [FTSIG] This analysis deals with the following article and diagrams therein: Nationality, Citizenship, and Tax Status – How They Differ, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/nationality-citizenship-and-tax-status-how-they-differ/ The above diagram + the AI…