Posts by ftsig-admin
Authorities On Thirteenth Amendment Involuntary Servitude relative to “nationals of the United States” (aliens excluded)
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Constitution The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids “involuntary servitude: Thirteenth Amendment Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Congress shall have power to…
Read MoreHOW TO: How to demand “reasonable notice” of whether you are dealing with the DE JURE or the DE FACTO government in an enforcement proceeding?
INTRODUCTION: This article describes how to: More on this subject at: Requirement for Reasonable Notice, Form #05.022https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ReasonableNotice.pdf QUESTION 1: You said that the dispute between the personPUB fiction and the human officer or personPRI mentioned in the Bill of Rights is one of the oldest disputes on the planet. Given that fact, there should certainly…
Read MoreCopilot: Judicial Tactics to Prevent Personal Liability for Non-Consensual Conversion from PRIVATE to PUBLIC (theft)
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions describes: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: In the case of an American national party to a suit before you involving civil statutory obligations, if you were a judge who wanted to protect himself from lawsuits involving the following: 1. Presumptions about personPUB status against nonconsenting parties. 2. Compelled…
Read MoreCopilot: Government agency or office under the Public Rights Doctrine
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions establishes that: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What would you call someone who executes instructions of the government on how to do a specific job, and receives no real compensation for doing so but who neither the government nor the specific person giving the instructions is responsible or…
Read MoreCopilot: Nefarious Uses of “Deeming Provisions”
INTRODUCTION: “Deeming provisions” in tax law are frequently abused to allow those not subject to tax to consent to do so anyway, and to do so INVISIBLY as a method of INVISIBLE CONSENT in many cases. This line of questions highlights their use. You see the abuse of this tactic in 26 U.S.C. §3402 where…
Read MoreCopilot: “Created or organized” as the origin of propertyPUB under the Public Rights Doctrine
INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: The I.R.C. defines “domestic” in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(4) as “created or organized in the United States”. 1. The fact that they used the words “created or organized” is essential to establish the civil status it created as propertyPUB. 2. The thing created is not referring to anything…
Read MoreCopilot: How the Government Regulates or Taxes your Private Property: Through the Public Interest Doctrine and Public Rights Doctrine
INTRODUCTION: The Public Interest Doctrine and the Public Rights Doctrine of the U.S. Supreme Court and their relationship to each other and to you are very important to understand because: This series of questions examines how all the above are implemented and how to challenge all the above processes in a court of law. It…
Read MoreDEBATE: Copilot v. FTSIG on NRA withdrawing W-4
INTRODUCTION: The W-4 is the WRONG form for All Americans who don’t work for the national government as described in 26 U.S.C. §3401(c). This site mandates that those using it may not consent to ANYTHING the government wants, and the W-4 is a vehicle for said consent. A better approach is to use the following…
Read MoreCopilot: When did the word “private” transition from absolute ownership under the common law to usufructary ownership under civil statutes?
INTRODUCTION: More information on this subject at: QUESTION 1: When did the term “private” transition from being defined as absolute ownership under common law principles to shared ownership through the personPUB usufruct under the civil statutory law? ANSWER 1: Great clarification — you’re asking specifically about the juridical shift in the meaning of “private”: from…
Read MoreCopilot: What “fact pattern” do you suggest to eliminate ALL equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE in a CIVIL context only?
QUESTION 1: For those wishing to PREVENT the type of equivocation between PUBLIC and PRIVATE you have consistently demonstrated throughout this interchange, precisely WHAT predicate “fact pattern” would you suggest included in each new series of questions to completely eliminate all such equivocation? Below is our attempt at doing so, but I’m sure you can…
Read More