DEBATE: State Income Taxes under Buck Act Do not include States of the Union

INTRODUCTION: This debate tests the applicability of the separation of powers doctrine to the concept of state income taxation. The separation of powers is described in detail in: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf The debate concludes that: The subject of this debate is a continuation of the following article: FAQ:…

Read More

PROOF: U.S. nationals who make no civil elections not subject to I.R.C. Chapter 3 or 24 withholding

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with applicability of I.R.C. Chapters 3 and Chapter 24 withholding. It is the position of this website that for a U.S. national who makes no elections and do not subject the W-4: The table below describes which statutes apply to the various permutations of “nonresident alien”: # Description “nonresident…

Read More

FAQ: Doesn’t the constitution allow anyone to consent to anything through “comity” just like many other countries in the world can?

INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: You begin the following article with a quote from Massachusetts v. United States SCOTUS opinion condoning comity and consent: Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-defeating-the-administrative-state/ The quote says: “We have repeatedly held that the Federal Government may impose appropriate conditions on the use of federal property or privileges [franchises,…

Read More

Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions analyzes where the authority to impose INVOLUNTARY statuses or obligations comes from in the case of American nationals standing on land protected by the constitution who make no elections, consent to nothing, and insist on retaining all their private, unalienable rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. More on this…

Read More

HOW TO: Distinguishing “Facts” from “Legal Conclusions”

INTRODUCTION: In the following article, we establish that your selection of form and the elections you make on the form are “legal conclusions” and not facts: Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix: Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/process-to-invisibly-join-the-matrix-electing-a-civil-statutory-status/ This series of questions explores this subject at great depth to: If you would like an example…

Read More

FAQ: What is a “permanent address”?

QUESTION 1: What is the legal definition of “permanent address” seen on most government forms? ANSWER 1: Below is a clear, legally grounded explanation of how “permanent address” is defined on most government forms, based strictly on authoritative sources and without drifting into doctrinal or philosophical interpretations. Legal Meaning of “Permanent Address” on Government Forms…

Read More