FAQ: Doesn’t the constitution allow anyone to consent to anything through “comity” just like many other countries in the world can?

INTRODUCTION: More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: You begin the following article with a quote from Massachusetts v. United States SCOTUS opinion condoning comity and consent: Microsoft Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-defeating-the-administrative-state/ The quote says: “We have repeatedly held that the Federal Government may impose appropriate conditions on the use of federal property or privileges [franchises,…

Read More

Copilot: Defeating the Administrative State

INTRODUCTION: This series of questions analyzes where the authority to impose INVOLUNTARY statuses or obligations comes from in the case of American nationals standing on land protected by the constitution who make no elections, consent to nothing, and insist on retaining all their private, unalienable rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. More on this…

Read More

HOW TO: Distinguishing “Facts” from “Legal Conclusions”

INTRODUCTION: In the following article, we establish that your selection of form and the elections you make on the form are “legal conclusions” and not facts: Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix: Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/process-to-invisibly-join-the-matrix-electing-a-civil-statutory-status/ This series of questions explores this subject at great depth to: QUESTION 1: Describe all the attributes…

Read More

FAQ: What is a “permanent address”?

QUESTION 1: What is the legal definition of “permanent address” seen on most government forms? ANSWER 1: Below is a clear, legally grounded explanation of how “permanent address” is defined on most government forms, based strictly on authoritative sources and without drifting into doctrinal or philosophical interpretations. Legal Meaning of “Permanent Address” on Government Forms…

Read More

PROOF OF FACTS: Courts admit they don’t give a damn about protecting your private rights or property, which is the ONLY purpose of establishing government to begin with

INTRODUCTION: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these [PRIVATE] rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the…

Read More

FAQ: Are information returns filed against nonresident alien American nationals standing on land protected by the Constitution and not effectively connected under Chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue Code lawful?

QUESTION: Are information returns filed against nonresident aliens not effectively connected under Chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue Code lawful? ANSWER: They are reporting falsely because:| The reports would only be lawful for those NOT protected by the constitution because OUTSIDE the country as a sovereign power. As a proprietary power, its a conspiracy against…

Read More

Copilot: Judicial tactics to avoid describing private rights or property as property and how to oppose them

INTRODUCTION: For more resources on this subject: QUESTION 1: List all the judicial tactics in mainstream doctrines that are used to avoid recognizing any of the following as “property” as defined in Black’s Law Dictionary: 1. Private rightsPRI in the Bill of Rights. 2. Statutory privileges in the civil law. 3. How private rightsPRI are…

Read More

Detailed Jurisdictional Layers based on FTSIG Symbology

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. List of layers Court jurisdiction is invoked based on the choice of law for any given proceeding. You as the Plaintiff determine that choice of law in most cases based on ownership of the property which you are invoking protection of the court over. Ownership gives rise to the right to…

Read More