Posts Tagged ‘eci’
CORRUPTION: The ECI/Deduction FRAUD in 26 U.S.C. 162
INTRODUCTION: Modern federal tax administration operates within a statutory and administrative framework that is frequently misunderstood by the public. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC), codified in Title 26, is not positive law under 1 U.S.C. § 204; it is merely prima facie evidence of law. This means its provisions function as presumptions, not binding facts, and…
Read MorePROOF: Effectively Connecting is NEVER INVOLUNTARY
1. Introduction Under the USPI–INTANGIBLE Office Axiom, every statutory “trade or business,” “taxpayer,” “individual,” “person,” “service,” or “personal service” in Title 26 is an INTANGIBLE federal office domiciled in United StatesGOV (District of Columbia). INTANGIBLE offices never arise in United StatesG by default and can exist “within the United States” only after a voluntary public‑capacity…
Read MoreCopilot: Can a U.S. national filing a 1040NR return have INVOLUNTARY ECI?
INTRODUCTION: This article examines the structural conflict between private‑capacityPRI constitutional protections and public‑capacityPUB statutory obligations in the context of federal income taxation, particularly the treatment of Effectively Connected Income (ECI) under 26 U.S.C. § 871(b). The analysis is grounded in the FTSIG PUB/PRI ontology, which distinguishes natural private status from government‑created statutory identities, and argues that…
Read MoreCopilot: Whether Retirement benefits of those not consenting to ECI are involuntarily ECI
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with the following scenario: Based on this analysis: More on this subject at: Retirement and Pensions, Form #08.028https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RetirementAndPensions.pdf QUESTION 1: Are 401k accounts “effectively connected” for those filing as a nonresident alien? ANSWER 1: Here’s the direct, authoritative, tax‑law‑grounded answer based on the IRS sources we just pulled: ⭐…
Read More