Posts Tagged ‘eci’
PROOF: Effectively Connecting is NEVER INVOLUNTARY
1. Introduction Under the USPI–INTANGIBLE Office Axiom, every statutory “trade or business,” “taxpayer,” “individual,” “person,” “service,” or “personal service” in Title 26 is an INTANGIBLE federal office domiciled in United StatesGOV (District of Columbia). INTANGIBLE offices never arise in United StatesG by default and can exist “within the United States” only after a voluntary public‑capacity…
Read MoreCopilot: Can a U.S. national filing a 1040NR return have INVOLUNTARY ECI?
QUESTION 1: 1. You previously said that: 1.1. Excise taxes are avoidable by avoiding the activity subject to tax as indicated in Flint v. Stone Tracy. 1.2. The income tax under I.R.C. Subtitle A is not an excise tax or a privilege tax but an indirect tax. You used Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad in…
Read MoreCopilot: Whether Retirement benefits of those not consenting to ECI are involuntarily ECI
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions deals with the following scenario: Based on this analysis: More on this subject at: Retirement and Pensions, Form #08.028https://sedm.org/Forms/08-PolicyDocs/RetirementAndPensions.pdf QUESTION 1: Are 401k accounts “effectively connected” for those filing as a nonresident alien? ANSWER 1: Here’s the direct, authoritative, tax‑law‑grounded answer based on the IRS sources we just pulled: ⭐…
Read More