FAQ: Is a “citizen” in the Fourteenth Amendment Politically associated with the National Body Politic and automatically operating in a Domestic Statutory Capacity?
QUESTION:
Are the following true?
- A “citizen” is politically associated with the national body politic.
- A “citizen” of the “United StatesJ” is politically associated with the national body politic AND operating in a domesticJ representative capacity for the United StatesGOV.
ANSWER:
No. Here’s why. The IRC deploys terms and combinations of terms which create classes and subclasses throughout the IRC. These terms appear to have the same meaning. They do not.
1. A “citizen” as defined at 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c) is associated with the national body politic (United StatesP) through birth or naturalization. This is generally all Americans. They are a CANDIDATE for political membership but not an ACTUAL member until they add CIVIL association to the mix.
2. However, the “citizen” of the “United States” contemplated in IRC §7701(a)(30)(A), and 26 C.F.R. §§1.1-1(a) and (b) is something more. It is a subclass of 1 above. It is:
A “citizen” through birth or naturalization PLUS a statutory classification reflecting a “domesticJ” representative capacity with the United StatesGOV. This is denoted as a ”citizen” of the “United StatesJ in I.R.C. §7701(a)(30)(A) and 26 C.F.R. §§1.1-1(a) and (b).
2.1. When the term “citizen” in the I.R.C. is seen in isolation, it refers only to one who has a political association with the nation. The term “United StatesP” is nested within the meaning of “citizen” defined at 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c). Because the territories and possessions are mentioned through Title 8 references is our indication that United StatesP is the context in the regulation.
2.2. However, when the term “citizen” of the “United States” appears elsewhere in the IRC or Treasury Regulations, the term “United States” is used to denote a domesticJ statutory classification. That is, “United StatesJ.” We frequently denote that as a “citizen”**+D, which represents a “citizen” in a domesticJ representative capacity of the United StatesGOV, otherwise known as a “United States person.”
2.3. Normally, domicile determines the civil status of an individual.
“[W]hile maintaining that the civil status is universally governed by the single principle of domicil, domicilium, the criterion established by international law for the purpose of determining civil status, and the basis on which “the personal rights of the party, that is to say, the law which determines his majority or minority, his marriage, succession, testacy or intestacy, must depend,”
[United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 656-57 (1898);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3381955771263111765]
But notice Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b), which states in relevant part:
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b)
(b) Capacity to Sue or Be Sued. Capacity to sue or be sued is determined as follows:
(1) for an individual who is not acting in a representative capacity, by the law of the individual’s domicile;
In the case of a “United States person,” the “citizen” is an individual acting in a domesticJ representative capacity to the federal government (United StatesGOV). This should provide great clarity to the following statement by Justice McKenna in the case, Cook v. Tait:
“In other words, the principle was declared that the government, by its very nature, benefits the [person who ELECTS the CIVIL STATUTORY FRANCHISE STATUS OF] citizen [on a 1040 Tax form like Cook did] and his property wherever found and, therefore, has the power to make the benefit complete. Or to express it another way, the basis of the power to tax was not and cannot be made dependent upon the situs of the property in all cases, it being in or out of the United States, and was not and cannot be made dependent upon the domicile of the citizen, that being in or out of the United States, but upon his relation [CIVIL FRANCHISE STATUS ELECTION] as citizen to the United States and the relation of the latter to him as citizen. The consequence of the relations is that the native citizen who is taxed may have domicile, and the property from which his income is derived may have situs, in a foreign country and the tax be legal — the government having power to impose the tax.
[Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47, 56 (1924);
SOURCE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10657110310496192378]
The important thing to understand, is that Cook “stepped into” the “citizen**+D” role, and thus entered into a representative capacity of the United StatesGOV as it’s agent. For this reason, his domicile in Mexico at the time was of no consequence.
Was Cook a “citizen” of the United StatesP? Yes. But he clothed himself in the public interest. And in so doing, became the “citizen” of the “United StatesJ.” Today, that status is known as a “United States person.”
He should have maintained a nonresident alien status that he had by default to protect his private rights and the private nature of his property.
3. AFTER BIRTH or naturalization, the “citizen*” by birth or naturalization can CIVILLY and LEGALLY DISASSOCIATE by:
3.1. NOT choosing a civil domicile.
3.2. Making no civil statutory capacity elections.
Doing the above makes them completely private and foreign and non-domestic under the bill of rights. That is the main implication of the First Amendment. If you can’t do THAT, you are literally a slave. See:
What is a “Slave”?, SEDM
https://sedm.org/what-is-a-slave/
This stance is reflected in the following document:
Self Government Federation: Articles of Confederation, Form #13.002
https://sedm.org/Forms/13-SelfFamilyChurchGovnce/SGFArtOfConfed.pdf
4. Domicile is the ONLY lawful the METHOD of CIVIL LEGAL association and membership per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17.
4.1. Just like “domestic”, “domicile” has as its root the Latin phrase “dom” which is synonymous with “household”. Every household has a “leader” and “law giver”.
4.2. The bible does NOT permit any civil lawgiver OTHER than God. To permit a GOVERNMENT civil lawgiver is idolatry. However, Christians are still subject to the criminal law and common law without their consent, like everyone else.
4.3. Personally, we insist on separating POLITICAL and CIVIL association so that the servant government doesn’t ever become a MASTER. CIVIL legal membership INVERTS the sovereignty hierarchy and puts SERVANT government into MASTER role making CIVIL rules for people they are supposed to be serving, and thus treating them as GOVERNMENT PROPERTY and slaves.
4.4. Domicile is a judicial invention not in the Constitution which is therefore unconstitutional to COMPEL.
Microsoft Copilot: Origin of domicile and authority of courts to use it, FTSIG-judges COMPELLING domicile
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-origin-of-domicile-and-authority-of-courts-to-use-it/
4.5. All civil privileges are a SUBSET of domicile that are possible ONLY after the DOMICILE civil statutory election. This includes the PRIVILEGE to vote and the PRIVILEGE to serve on a jury. Without domicile, civil privileges are identity theft.
5. AFTER civil legal association through the domicile election:
5.1. You nominate a secular king ABOVE you.
5.2. You fire God as your CIVIL protector and King and He HIDES HIS FACE. Then sin, curses, and judgement descends upon you and your family.
5.3. God becomes FOREIGN and Caesar becomes DOMESTIC.
5.4. You invite the curses in Deut. 28:43-51. See:
How Scoundrels Corrupted Our Republican Form of Government, Family Guardian
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/HowScCorruptOurRepubGovt.htm
5.5. You consent to surrender INDIVIDUALISM to COLLECTIVISM and socialism. See:
5.5.1. SEDM Foreign Tax Status AI Chatbot: Is the civil statutory law a tool to introduce collectivism?, SEDM
https://ftsig.org/sedm-foreign-tax-status-ai-chatbot-is-the-civil-statutory-law-a-tool-to-introduce-collectivism/
5.5.2. 2 Cor. 6:17:
“Come out from among them [the socialists who worship man instead of God] And be separate [FOREIGN and SANCTIFIED], says the Lord. Do not touch [or JOIN as a First Amendment act of legal/civil association and collectivism] what is unclean, And I will receive you.”
[2 Cor. 6:17, Bible, NKVJ]
6. Abraham Lincoln admitted in his Gettysburg Address that that if AFTER birth you DO CIVILLY/LEGALLY associate, you become a government agent or representative:
“A government OF the people, BY the people, and FOR the people.”
6.1. So did Senator Amy Klobuchar at the Trump Inauguration:
REBUTTAL: U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar Admits at Trump Inauguration on 1/20/25 CIVIL/DOMICILED Citizen**+D is a PUBLIC OFFICE!, SEDM
https://sedm.org/rebuttal-u-s-senator-amy-klobuchar-admits-at-trump-inauguration-on-1-20-25-civil-domiciled-citizend-is-a-public-office/
6.2. And so did President Obama in his farewell address even.
President Obama Admits in His Farewll Address that “citizen” is a public office, SEDM Exhibit #01.018
https://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX01.018-39-45-20170110-Obama%20Farewell%20Speech.mp4
With so much evidence, that claim is mighty hard to argue with.
7. AFTER implementing COLLECTIVISM and SOCIALISM with the CIVIL statutory law, the following consequences are inevitable:
7.1. Government becomes GOD an asserts SOVEREIGN POWER over everything.
7.2. Consent becomes IRRELEVANT to every interaction with government.
7.3. All formerly PRIVATE property becomes PUBLIC property of the COLLECTIVE.
7.4. Because ABSOLUTE ownership has been removed from the individual, so has RESPONSIBILITY and INCENTIVE for keeping it up. They thus avoid responsibility for the maintenance of their property.
7.5. Government likewise does the same thing, and ignores maintaining public property because they can’t be held legally accountable with sovereign immunity.
7.6. The entire society falls into disrepair and anarchy and literally self-destructs because NO ONE has responsibility for anything. Responsibility and ownership always go together. That anarchy BEGAN as GOVERNMENT anarchy that we have now:
Your Irresponsible, Lawless, Anarchist Beast Government, Form #05.054
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/YourIrresponsibleLawlessGov.pdf
8. As anarchy and despair spread, people flee the government or state that is causing and go to states or countries more favorable to private property and private rights.
9. As people leave the corrupted jurisdiction in a diaspora, they take their money, their investment, and their tax revenues with them.
10. Because of the exodus of the haves leaving the have-nots behind, urban and societal collapse accelerates because government loses its tax revenues and has to reduce services. The collapse of governmental functions accelerates the diaspora and exodus. This is happening in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and California at this time.
Further Reading:
- God v. Caesar: Which CIVIL membership will you Choose?, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/god-v-caesar-the-civil-religion/ - “THE MATRIX” in a Nutshell, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/the-matrix-in-a-nutshell/