FAQ: Are information returns filed against nonresident alien American nationals standing on land protected by the Constitution and not effectively connected under Chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue Code lawful?

By ftsig-admin | February 16, 2026

QUESTION:

Are information returns filed against nonresident aliens not effectively connected under Chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue Code lawful?

ANSWER:

They are reporting falsely because:|

The information returns violate Fourth Amendment privacy, and they are done as an alleged agent of the government so they have to obey the Fourth Amendment under the State Action Doctrine. See:
Catalog of U.S. Supreme Court Doctrines, Litigation Tool #10.020
https://sedm.org/Litigation/10-PracticeGuides/SCDoctrines.pdf
The reports are signed under penalty of perjury but contain legal determinations that are not facts, so they are false. See:
Process to “Invisibly” join the Matrix: Electing a CIVIL STATUTORY STATUS, FTSIG
https://ftsig.org/how-you-volunteer/process-to-invisibly-join-the-matrix-electing-a-civil-statutory-status/
The reporting private company can’t violate your privacy as a government agent without your consent but they do it anyway, even after being notified, so their defiance is criminally willful and constitutes mens rea. Government refuses to prosecute these crimes for the constitutional tort. They rely on equivocation to evade their own personal responsibility for causing these false reports.
The result is that the SLANDER TITLE to your own body and earnings from your labor. This works a purpose OPPOSITE of why government is established: to PROTECT private property enumerated in the bill of rights. See:
Separation Between Public and Private Course, Form #12.025
https://sedm.org/LibertyU/SeparatingPublicPrivate.pdf
The result is a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment and unjust recruitment into criminal peonage.
Proof that Involuntary Income Taxes on Your Labor are Slavery, Form #05.055
https://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/ProofIncomeTaxLaborSlavery.pdf
The filer of the false report purports to document “U.S. source” income that is NOT truly “U.S. source” because:
6.1. Reporting party PRESUMES that the source is exclusively geographical when the geography is just a smoke screen for United States^GOV. This is a violation of due process of law.
6.2. The government denies that reporting party is an agent of the government but in fact they MUST in order to have any duty to report or withhold at all. Thus, government refuses any obligation for the actions of these “useful idiots” but reaps financial benefits anyway. That’s unjust enrichment. See the following for how to prosecute unjust enrichment:
Common Law and Equity Litigation**, SEDM
https://sedm.org/common-law-litigation/
The reports thus result in criminal identity theft:
Identity Theft Affidavit, Form #14.020
https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/Identity_Theft_Affidavit-f14039.pdf

The reports would only be lawful for those NOT protected by the constitution because OUTSIDE the country as a sovereign power. As a proprietary power, its a conspiracy against private rights.