Proof of Facts
1. STATEMENT OF PROOF OF FACTS 1. Taxes are “largely a political matter”. This doesn’t mean they are EXCLUSIVELY a political matter, because nonresidents are not members of the body politic. “Thus, the Court has frequently held that domicile or residence, more substantial than mere presence in transit or sojourn, is an adequate basis for…
EDITORIAL: This case provides an example of the adverse affects of being victimized by a PRESUMPTIVE domicile which the victim did NOT want to have and how to oppose it in the supreme court of the state. The presumption in this case is STATUTORY and imposed by the Legislature, but it could just as well…
The U.S. Supreme Court has long held that ambiguities in tax statutes are to be construed in favor of the party against whom the tax is laid. In Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, 153 (1917), the Court recognized that: “In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes it is the established rule not to extend…
The main word used for equivocation about whether an earning is statutory “income” is the word “includible” v. “includable”. Here is the trickery involved: Legal Documents In legal documents, the use of “includable” or “includible” can have a significant impact on the interpretation of the document. For example, if a contract states that certain items…
FALSE STATEMENT: We as a company have to to do “wage” withholding and reporting on you because we are an “employer” and you are an “employee” per the Internal Revenue Code. REBUTTAL: As a general rule, it is difficult and sometimes impossible to prove a negative, which in this case is that I am NOT…
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Distinguishing Between Capital and Income What it the difference between capital and income, and what is the relationship between them? This should be Basic Economics 101, but this distinction has become an economic riddle that few seem inclined to solve. The distinction between capital and income is explained in the 1913 Congressional…
SOURCE: Excluded Earnings and People, Form #14.019, Section 4; https://sedm.org/Forms/14-PropProtection/ExcludedEarningsAndPeople.pdf It is CRUCIAL to understand the distinction between being CONSTITUTIONALLY EXCLUDED from income tax versus being STATUTORILY EXEMPT. The reason is that if you do NOT understand this difference and you are a purveyor of tax information, you may become the target of UNJUST and…
For an example of how to implement the above in responding to a tax collection notice, see: Using the Laws of Property to Respond to a Tax Collection Notice, Form #14.015https://sedm.org/using-the-laws-of-property-to-respond-to-a-federal-or-state-tax-collection-notice/ More like the above at: PROOF OF FACTS: What the geographical “United States” means in 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/proof-of-facts-what-the-geographical-united-states-means-in-26-u-s-c-7701a9-and-a10/
EDITORIAL: Throughout IRS publications, they frequently use the phrase “created or organized” as a way to describe things they have jurisdiction over. An act of enacting legislation is an act of creation. The creator of a thing is always the owner. A “civil status” is a fiction of law to which privileges and obligations attach.…
The U.S. Government Style Manual, 2016 Edition, on p. 32 says the following: So a LOWER CASE “state” refers to a LEGISLATIVELY FOREIGN state. This is entirely consistent with the capitalization conventions listed in: Sources of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, FTSIGhttps://ftsig.org/civil-political-jurisdiction/sources-of-extraterritorial-civil-jurisdiction/ You can find the above manual at: Style Manual, U.S. Government Printing Office, 2016govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2016/pdf/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2016.pdf