Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5117525999793250938 SIGNIFICANCE: Established POLITICAL citizens* of a state as ipso facto also POLITICAL “citizens of the United States”. This forecloses any possibility that anyone can claim that they can be a state political citizen* without also being a national political citizen*.

Read More

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3381955771263111765 SIGNIFICANCE: Establishes the TWO components of citizenship: nationality and civil status (domicile). For an article on this subject, see: REBUTTAL: MSNBC Lies about the Fourteenth Amendment, SEDMhttps://sedm.org/msnbc-lies-about-the-fourteenth-amendment/

Read More

Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13333263776496540273 SIGNIFICANCE: EXCERPT: The several States of the Union are not, it is true, in every respect independent, many of the rights and powers which originally belonged to them being now vested in the government created by the Constitution. But, except as restrained and limited by that instrument, they possess and exercise…

Read More

Milwaukee v. White, 296 U.S. 268 (1935)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5901183028124997123 SIGNIFICANCE: Declare income taxation “quasi-contractual” “Even if the judgment is deemed to be colored by the nature of the obligation whose validity it establishes, and we are free to re-examine it, and, if we find it to be based on an obligation penal in character, to refuse to enforce it outside…

Read More

Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U.S. 276 (1932)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10241277000101996613 SIGNIFICANCE: Declared all state income taxes as being based on domicile. Appellant, a citizen and resident of Mississippi, brought the present suit to set aside the assessment of a tax upon so much of his net income for 1929 as arose from the construction by him of public highways in the…

Read More

Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1869)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1134912565671891096 SIGNIFICANCE: HOWEVER, the CONTEXT of discussion in this case is the CONSTITUTIONAL context, not the CIVIL STATUTORY context. Therefore, in a CIVIL context the POLITICAL sense is NOT the principal sense. The Constitution (Bill of Rights) protects main PRIVATE property. Civil statutes protect and regulate PUBLIC property. When you invoke a…

Read More

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5893140094506516673 DOCKET: You can read filings from the docket below: SIGNIFICANCE: We are not aware of any acknowledgement by the U.S. Supreme Court of 26 U.S.C. §871(b) from anything OTHER than federal corporations. State corporations, by the way, are NOT federal corporations. They may make a domestication election on IRS Form 8832,…

Read More

Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924)

LINK TO CASE: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10657110310496192378 AI DISCOVERY ON THIS CASE: Copilot: Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924) Implicationshttps://ftsig.org/copilot-cook-v-tait/ SIGNIFICANCE: The fact that the “citizen* of the United States****(government, not geography)” that the income tax is imposed upon in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a) is a voluntary franchise office as held by this case actually makes it much…

Read More